Ethical Boundaries Analysis

Ethical dilemmas are a struggle for all human service professionals such as discrimination, displaying empathy and recognizing a client’s unmet needs. Discrimination is the knowledge or carelessness of destroying another’s self-esteem by focusing on their disability. Overcoming discrimination for many individuals can be a battle that they may sometimes succumb to without proper assistance and failure of the worker to apply the ethical standards properly. In the National Organization of Human Services Handbook listed in the responsibility to the Community and Society section statement seventeen is found, “Human service professionals provide services without discrimination or preference based on age, ethnicity, culture, race, disability, gender, religion, sexual orientation or socioeconomic status.” (NOWS, Adopted 1996)

In today’s psychology profession, a therapist and even the client can cross many boundaries if immediate boundaries are not put into place during the initial visit. Some boundaries that are crossed are not a problem at first and then the problem progresses. Leonard L. Glass called these, “the gray areas of boundary crossing and violation” (429). However, there is further description, “Boundary issues mostly refer to the therapist's self-disclosure, touch, an exchange of gifts, bartering and fees, length and location of sessions and contact outside the office” (Guthiel & Gabbard). This statement by Thomas G. Gutheil, M.D. & Glen O. Gabbard, M.D explains the meaning of boundary

This is completely stepping over professional boundaries in my opinion. Therapists aren't your friends and family, they are professionals that happen to work with you on an emotional level. Most people don't realize they are becoming dependent until they are completely dependent. The Doctor may be too late to intervene with the client causing a co-dependency if she continues to hug the client. The Doctor should addressed her concerns about the behavior of the client. Rather than just referring out of the therapy session, maybe the client will understand the position of the therapist. If the client continues the therapist would have no other choice but to refer out, this will keep from acting unethically. In the ethic codes (A.6.b.) from the

In the mental health profession of counseling, therapy, psychology, psychiatric and social services ethical dilemmas are faced primarily on a daily basis. Being that mental health professionals are working with clients who are often fragile and vulnerable, they must develop an intense awareness of ethical issues. On the other hand, mental health professionals would never intentionally harm their clients, students or colleagues and others whom they work with. Unfortunately, good intentions are not enough to ensure that wrong doings will not occur and mental health professionals have no choice but to make ethically determined decisions. Depending upon the experience and expertise of the professional determines the outcome of the ethical

Ethics are very important because it sets up boundaries for what a science can and cannot do in their research. These boundaries are important when health and safety, when human involvement is science is present.

Build a mirror CRM production system over the next two weeks so that a rebuilding of the main CRM system could occur to plug security holes and assure that another DoS attack would not be successful.

In 2008, Donna went into the ER with abdominal pain, where she further required a laparotomy. She went to sleep while the anaesthesiologist was there and woke up thinking the surgery was complete. She then heard the surgeon say “scalpel please” and she knew it was not over. She began to panic and heard the people in the room notice her heart rate going up. She also heard the surgeon order that the anaesthesiologist come back. When he did, he pushed more medication through the IV but nothing happened. She remained awake through the entire procedure. Donna describes the cutting and shifting of organs she felt during the procedure as painful. She describes herself as traumatized and saying her mental

Federn (1961) states that individuals separate their internal experience from the external world through psychological boundaries. In addition, these boundaries allow an individual to maintain the distinction between oneself and others (Mahler, Pine, & Bergman, 1975). In the context of therapy boundaries between the therapist and client provide an environment that fosters safety and trust enabling exploration. This dynamic places mental health professionals in a position of power over the client (Simon, 1992). This power differential creates a responsibility for the therapist to create and maintain appropriate, professional boundaries. When speaking about departures from commonly accepted clinical practice it is necessary to distinguish between boundary crossing and boundary violations. Whereas boundary crossing may or may not benefit the client, boundary violations have the potential to seriously harm the client or the therapeutic process (Simon, 1992). It is important to note that either the client or the therapist has the ability to cross or violate boundaries. However, the duty to put the client’s therapeutic care and goals first lay with the clinician alone.

The article in reference to the ethics as related to disability case management talks about the dilemmas that healthcare providers run into with an adult with learning disabilities regarding what are right and what wrong for the client. This article of Ethical challenges to everyday work with adults with learning disabilities raises / raised awareness and to understand what ethical values are at stake for the adult with learning disabilities. The discussion focused on everyday ethical challenges, the meaning of being in-between and shared responsibility and the meaning of ethical

In the email message, there are two parts to this ethical dilemm. On one hand, you must consider your professional career. If you inform your friend about the information you learned, and someone found out you were the one who told, you could be in serious trouble with the hospital you work for. There is also the issue of company loyality, do you like working for that hospital? Have they treated you well? I would feel some since of loyality to protect their information. On the other hand, don't you have an obligation to be a good friend, I mean she just bought a house, losing her job could most defiently put her in a fiance bind. A head's up about the changes in the company might be nice so she is better perpared to deal with loss of her job.

I am reminded, that not all dual relationships are bad, and that sometimes boundaries are meant to be crossed, but of course they should never be violated. Author and psychotherapist, Ofer Zur, Ph.D., shared examples of a boundary violations such as going to lunch with an anorexic patient, attending a client’s wedding and appropriate self-disclosures as being examples of appropriate boundary crossings. (Zur, 2004, p.28) In contrast, a boundary violations, Zur explained are often illegal, always unethical and usually exploitative. (Zur, 2004, p.27) However, I also recall that Zur’s colleague, Arnold A. Lazarus, Ph.D., warned that one must be wise in deciphering whether or not to step outside of a strictly professional relationship. Lazarus shared a warning to be extra careful when dealing with clients that show histrionic, borderline, aggressive tendencies, etc. Lazarus also shared though that being willing to step outside the norm of some boundaries, can increase trust and facilitate a sense of camaraderie with a client. (Lazarus, 2001, p. 16) I sense that having Annie on my daughter’s softball team, would be considered by Zur to be a medium level dual relationship, similar to as if Jake and I attended the same church or school meetings. According to Zur, dual relationships are often experienced at three different levels: low, medium, and intense. (Zur, 2015) Lower than attending the same

Consumers today want to do business with reputable companies that are led and managed by ethical decision makers. Ethical decision makers look to partner with other companies that share similar morals and values. In other words, the public and other companies want to associate with an organization that will make ethical judgements. Ethical decisions are not always obvious nor are they based on what is right or wrong or what is good or bad (Gonzalez-Padron, 2015). They are choices made by managers at all levels and stakeholders who follow the company’s core values, ethics policies and moral compass. One leader who is an example of integrity and ethics is Bill Daniels, who opened and operated a small insurance agency in Wyoming. Analyzing Bill Daniel’s ethical tradition, decision approach, and moral development will provide a foundation to Bill’s business methodology.

Due to the many corporate, social and environmental effects of the BP oil spill, genuine ethical and legal questions of social, corporate and business responsibilities that resulted in negative externalities were raised. Many of these pertain with BP PLC complying with environmental laws, making efforts to build and maintain shareholder values to a range of organizations, and with health and safety methods ensure the safe practice and well-being of the workers. Individual vegetations along the gulf coast were damaged resulting in defected food sources, flouting the Endangered Species Act, and creating an avoidable conflict with the EPA. In addition, it affected people who were in no connection with the company and its dealings, but still had to suffer the consequences both economically and environmentally. Thus, it brings about the many legal issues that pertain to the bogus claims by BP PLC and its cooperating companies, like Transocean and Halliburton, about the methods in which the ridge would be covered, how families would be compensated for the loss of their relatives who were either harmed during the explosion or afterwards during cleanup times.

A boundary is defined as “the edge of appropriate, professional conduct” that differentiates between behaviour that is appropriate in a professional capacity, and behaviour that is not (Guthiel, 2005, p. 89; Allen, 2001). Boundary issues may arise around the professional external boundaries that are set including role issues, time, place, money, and physical and sexual contact, among other things (Guthiel, 2005). For most clients, a customary therapeutic relationship developed around these boundaries is all that is required; but others, mostly the more disturbed clients, require engagement that goes beyond the standard model (Waldinger, 1994). Boundaries then become difficult to define as it is not possible to codify all aspects of human interaction

The ethical issue intensity was medium-high strength. There was more than one issue and each issue had a different level of intensity. The misuse of products had a low intensity, ethical whistleblowing had a medium-low level of intensity and the pesticide issue had high intensity. Disagreements over the intensity of the issues was resolved by discussing why we had different intensities and what each person’s idea was with the level of intensity they had.