Ethical Concerns Within Public Research

In this article participants were given written and verbal information about the study and confidentiality, anonymity and withdrawal were reassured. All participants were fully informed and consented. Moreover, as the participant for this design is to permit the participants to ‘open up’ and discuss their experiences. It is crucial that any given time the participant should be permitted to discontinue with the interview if they feel uncomfortable. This is called as process consent, whereby the interview continuously negotiates with the interviewee to determine whether they are comfortable in continuing with the interview, (Polit and Beck, 2006). There are many ethical aspects to consider, the above is just one fraction used as an example, by simply suggesting that ethical guidelines were adhered to, does not illustrate ethical consideration. They did not show how to make the participant safe if they were difficult to manage.

A number of key terms describe the system of ethical considerations that the modern research establishments have set up to protect the rights of research subjects. Voluntary participation and confidentiality are principles that demands that the respondents to be free from coercion in any way when participating in the research, protected in the raw data, and published

The informed consent should indicate the participant has read, and understands the details of the study. A statement regarding the maintenance of privacy, confidentiality, and right to decline to participate is included on the consent form, and discussed with each participant prior to the beginning of any interviews. One copy of the consent form is provided to the participant for their records, with the original signed copy is maintained by the researcher in safe

When dealing with privacy, the data protection act requires that the identity of all participants remains confidential. As well as safeguarding privacy there is an obvious practical benefit from this approach. Participants are unlikely to volunteer for procedures if they believe that their identity and behaviour will be divulged. There were clear breaches of confidentiality in the Milgram and Zimbardo studies as in both cases participants were secretly filmed. Guidelines require that participants are not identified unless they give their permission and various methods may be used to disguise their identity. For example in case studies patients may be identified only by their initials such as KF or HM.

Each participant was presented a consent form electronically, and confidentiality was maintained throughout the process. (See Appendix A.) Steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of the respondents included assigning an alias name or number to each respondent requesting such, presenting the consent form that explained to participants that they had been selected to participate in the study, and minimizing “off the record” conversations. The only identification of individual interview data in reports was by subjects’ MASSP

I will make sure that there will be no harm done to the participants, it is important that those that are partaking in the interview processes will not be physically or emotionally harmed (Bryman 135). One of the issues the participants may face is feeling that what they are telling me may or may not be anonymous or

The research investigates information from the public and comes up with favorable conclusions that can be used to increase knowledge. Some of the data gathered from the public can be sensitive information that may interfere with the privacy of the subject or put the subject at risk. Some of the dangers that may affect the participant are physical danger or emotional torment. It is thus important to protect the privacy and integrity of the people being interviewed to ensure that their contribution does not affect them. Since research is a continuous process. It is important to ensure that the process of research is effective. Interviewed individuals need to feel safe to produce credible information that will enable the researcher to provide credible information to the public. Apart from providing credible information, participation in a research can be as part of an experiment that requires subjects to participate (Miller & Yang, 2007).

The participant was a white,50 years old British woman. Prior to the interview an informed consent permitting the use of the material was signed. Participant was also informed of right to withdraw at any time and her right to decide for any data to be destroyed. After the interview the participant was debriefed and given a chance to give feedback and discuss her feelings about the experience.

First and foremost the participants must be voluntary. In all ethical research when conducting research there must be willing participants. Research has shown that when participants volunteer they shouldn’t feel coerced, threatened or bribed into participation. Second, informed consent must be described at the onset of the study. Participants are told about the procedures and informed of any potential risks; there also should be documented in written form, ensuring the participant know about the experiment and can make informed decisions about whether or not they want to participate. Meanwhile, this can present problems in cases where telling the participants the necessary details about the experiment might unduly influence their responses or behaviors in the study. However, it is stated in this article which allows in certain instances, but only if the study would be impossible to conduct without the use of deception, if the research will provide some sort of valuable insight and if the subjects will be debriefed and informed about the study's true purpose after the data has been collected searchers Must Maintain Participant Confidentiality. Finally, while guidelines can provide some ethical standards for research, each study can pose different unique challenges. Likewise, confidentiality is a part of any ethical research. Participants need to be guaranteed that

Research Materials, Records, and Privacy Issues. (Identify the sources of material that will be obtained from subjects, what information will be recorded, concerns relating to privacy of subjects, and explain why this information is needed to conduct the research activities.) The information received from potential participants will be recorded and filed with a lock and key in the researcher’s office. Participant’s identity will be unknown to the researchers, and their responses will be

In order to provide respect for potential and enrolled subjects through proper confidentiality, I will make sure to respect the privacy of the human subjects and will keep their private information confidential. Using the same process as the informed consent, I will do the interviews and questionnaires in a private place. The names of participants will never be used, and an identification number will be used for each participant to identify them. Some questionnaires will be done on paper while others, as well as the interviews, will be completed using a computer to store the responses. All of this information will be kept confidential, and only I will have access to it. I will provide a summary of the results from my practicum experience to the three clinics where I rotated and did my research project. These results will be available for the participants to have access to what was learned from the research.

In order to conduct my research, I asked the three participants for their approval of having me interview them for my case study. I gave them background information of what and why I was conducting this research. After getting the stamp of approval, I emailed the participants with applicable questions for them to each answer. In the interviews I gave them background information of what standardized tests are just to make sure they are all on the same page. I received the completed and answered interview questions back from each of them in less than a week. I thanked each one of them in advance and also after receiving their completed interview. The interview will help guide me into analyzing common ideas or differences they each have over the same questions.

This study involved interviewing two child participants. The children agreed to take part in a practical investigation and share their thoughts about it in the interviews. The parents signed a consent form to give their permission for the interviews using video-recording. The consent was in line with the ethical guidelines for conducting research with human participants as outlined by the British Psychological Society (BPS). Moreover, surnames of the participants were not disclosed for confidentiality purposes, in accordance with the BPS ethics. The interviews were conducted in the school library by a researcher. During the interview the two cameramen, a sound recordist, the producer, university member and a classroom assistant were also present in the room. The children were interviewed separately and were put at ease before starting the investigation

Before each interview, a consent form was also issued to every participant that informed them about the purpose of the research. The consent form also informed participants that the interview would be audio recorded and would range from 45 minutes to an hour of length. A signature from the participants was required before proceeding with the interviews. The consent form was provided in both English and Spanish to

Conducting a study using humans as participants raises a variety of ethical concerns. This is why it is necessary to inform the participants of the purpose of the interview or focus group and what it plans to accomplish. Also, the privacy of each participant must be respected when publishing or distributing all research findings. If these requirements are not met, the study being conducted will in turn become unethical.