Abstract
In synopsis, the case involves Ruby, a therapist that is counseling Henry, who expresses extremely hostile feelings toward homosexuals and toward people who have contracted AIDS. Henry is not coming to counseling to work on his feelings about gay people; his primary goal is to work out his feelings of resentment over his wife, who left him. He thinks homosexual people are deviant and that it serves them right if they do get AIDS. Ruby’s son is gay and Henry’s prejudice affects her emotionally. She is taken aback by her client’s comments and she finds that his vies are getting in the way as she attempts to work with him. The development of a dynamic set of ethical standards for psychologists’ work related conduct requires a
…show more content…
In identifying the problem or dilemma, it must be examined in a neutral light. To project or countertransfer feelings onto the situation would alter the ability of handling the situation within this therapeutic relationship in an ethical manner. It is recognized that countertransference can be either a constructive or destructive element and manifest itself in many ways. According to Watkins (1985), there are eight possible contertransference ethical obstructions: 1) being overprotective with a client, 2) treating a client in benign ways, 3) rejecting the client, 4) needing constant reinforcement and approval, 5) seeing yourself in your client, 6) developing sexual or romantic feelings toward a client, 7) giving advice and 8) developing a social relationship with a client (Watkins, 1985).
Ruby could be risking rejecting her client or at the least treating her client in benign ways in order to distance her from the hurt she feels about his prejudice behavior toward gays. By remaining neutral while identifying the problem, Ruby can assist her client, place his needs first and take care to do no harm which upholds the APA Code of Ethics, Principle A: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence. Ruby should focus on the primary goal that
Ethical dilemmas may arise during the course of a human service professional’s time with the client. The difficulty in finding a resolution to an ethical dilemma depends on the human service professional’s ethical practice and personal belief system. I believe that I would have little difficulty avoiding a dual relationship. My personal belief system tells me that a dual relationship creates a conflict of interest between the human service professional and the client. It leaves the door open for exploitation between both parties. It is a very fine line to walk when trying to gain the trust of the client. However, the main objective is to respect the integrity of the client and avoid any activities that could open the door to an intimate relationship that is unprofessional. I had an experience where the client’s sister was interested in me and wanted to know me in a way that was unprofessional. Ethically, I knew it was wrong and because of my personal belief I chose not to entertain her. Then, I notified my supervisor. An ethical dilemma that would be difficult for me to handle would be when a spouse shares information in confidentiality during marriage counseling, but does not want the other spouse to know. If I am counseling a husband and wife,
Critical thinking and ethical decision making are crucial for academic success as well as career success. Both critical thinking and ethical choices allow an appreciation of diverse points of view using analytic approaches, create a tolerance for and an appreciation of ambiguity, allow for creative problem-solving, and give the ability to integrate knowledge from diverse viewpoints into unified ideas and strategies. To better understand how critical thinking and ethics impacts our success, we must analyze these skills and how they relate to us academically, and to our future careers.
In the case of Sheila, we learn the unethical and unprofessional issues that we as counselors never want to institute. It is absolutely important for counselors to be properly trained in cases that need sensitivity and understanding of cultural differences. Otherwise, we may impose our own values onto our clients without the intention to do so. It is essential that therapists are aware of their own beliefs and values in order to better serve their clients so that the professional is not bias towards those seeking help. If someone is not confident in a situation that concerns their clients well-being, seek supervision for further assistance. In the following essay we will review different codes of ethics that relates to Sheila’s case with her client, Brendan and how to execute them as professionals in the helping field. Sheila was dismissive and insensitive when Brendan shared his spiritual values to her, which ultimately caused him to leave their session. Here we learn how a counselor should carry themselves in cases such as this.
According to the American Psychological Association (APA), psychologists provide services with populations and in areas only within the boundaries of their competence, based on their education, training, supervised experience, consultation study, or professional experience, together with safeguarding my understanding of factors associated with age, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, etc. (APA, 2017, 2.01a, 2.01b). Along the same lines, psychologists do not engage in unfair discrimination or harassment based on age, gender, gender identify, sexual orientation, etc. (APA, 2017, 3.01, 3.03). Thus, although in this case I would be treating Matthew’s parents or family, they were deeply affected by the outcome of a gruesome anti-gay hate crime, therefore I would need to ensure that I would not be inclined to discriminate in any way. Furthermore, even though at the time of Matthew’s assault there was not any legislation regarding hate crimes that referred to anti-gay acts and same-sex marriage was not yet legalized, as an ethical psychologist it is important to remain cognizant that regardless of any conflicts between ethics and the law or regulations, under no circumstances should psychologists use said law or regulations to justify or defend the
In unit seven I was asked to review a case study video regarding Dr. Williams and his client, Juan. The Dr. Williams and Juan case is intriguing because Dr. Williams’s actions toward Juan and his family are lousy and cringe worthy. Quick synopsis, Dr. Williams defy principles E and B stated within the APA code of ethics. Principle E states that Psychologists must respect the dignity and worth of all people, and the rights of individuals to privacy, confidentiality, and self-determination. Principle B states that Psychologists must establish relationships of trust with clients. The first mistake I recognized Dr. Williams making pertains to his nonexistent eye contact towards his client, Juan. The sense of human connection come from eye
Ethical violations of unlicensed therapists claim to cure homosexuality. Richard Cohen purposely promoted that he had the cure for homosexuality. He claimed to have started off with one of his gay friends who didn’t want to be gay anymore. He held sessions with his friend and continued them till his friend was allegedly no longer gay. After the first success, he then decided to try it out with other people outside his comfort zone. He had done research and practiced over and over again till he figured that it was correct and that he would finally have a cure to fix this homosexuality epidemic.
An ethical dilemma is an incident that causes us to question how we should react based on our beliefs. A decision needs to be made between right and wrong. I have experienced many ethical dilemmas in my lifetime, so I know that there is no such thing as an ethical dilemma that only affects one person. I also know that some ethical dilemmas are easier to resolve than others are. The easy ones are the ones in which we can make decisions on the spot. For example, if a cashier gives me too much change, I can immediately make a decision to either return the money or keep it. Based on Kant’s, categorical imperative there are two criteria for determining moral right and wrong. First, there is universalizability, which states, “the person’s
Throughout my 13-year career in the Human Services field, spending the majority of that time working with adolescent girls in residential treatment facilities, I am very much aware of the risks that exist with regard to sexual relationships between professionals and clients. In that time, it came to my attention that at least three employees at programs where I was employed had sexual relationships with clients. In addition to the ethical issues that arose from these situations, all of the clients were under 18 years of age so the actions of these employees had legal ramifications. Many of our clients had been victims of sexual abuse prior to admission into our program. I always viewed our programs as safe places where clients would be treated with respect and could develop strong therapeutic relationships with both their counselors and program staff members. Unfortunately, the actions of a few had a detrimental effect on our programs and also the lives of our clients. Having dealt with these issues and focusing on ethical decision-making throughout my education and professional career, the ethical dilemma of
My professional and personal values remained congruent with the social justice and social advocacy mission values of CICI, and afforded me the chance to see the ethics of my mental health counseling program in action. Accordingly, my values stand as self-determination to encourage social justice and social change on behalf of my clients. It behooves me to highlight how meaningful this value subsists for me since this was one of the central purposes that inspired me to pursue a career in mental health counseling. As a gay man, I realized that the LGBTQ community needs many advocates for their rights and for society’s acceptance, especially for the LGBTQ youth of today. Therefore, I recognized that counseling was
There are many ethical issues that can arise during counseling. One issue that is fairly common is sexual attraction from patient to counselor, counselor to patient, or even in both directions. Even though an attraction may exist, this does not necessarily mean that these instincts will be followed in any inappropriate way. In fact attraction is a natural part of life and is impossible to avoid. However, any fulfillment of these desires is an unethical act that could not only be in violation of the code of ethics that a counselor is bound by, but it could also subject the counselor and their organization to litigation and legal action.
In today's business and personal world, ethical decisions are made on a daily basis. Most of these decisions are based on company ground rules. The others are based on personal ground rules. All decisions can have a number of ground rules that help us determine whether our decision is ethical or unethical. Each decision whether it is based on company or personal ground rules will have its own set of implications. In the following paragraphs I will discuss the impacts of ethics on decision-making, discuss the elements of an ethically defensible decision, define what the ground rules are; what they could be and what they should be, discuss
Moral issues are those that arouse conscience, are concerned with important values and norms. The use of a tool such as the Ethical Decision-Making Algorithm in appendix A, can help the nurse resolve an ethical dilemma more efficiently and competently. Furthermore, the use of a nursing codes of ethics, which are formal statements standard for professional actions can help guild a nurses decisions. Nurses have multiple obligations to balance in moral situation. The Ethical Decision-Making Algorithm will be used to find the best action and outcome for a case study.
All employees (including the company executives) should be guided by moral principles and ethical values when making decisions (Balc & Simionescu, 2012). The ability of executives to make ethical decisions can be influenced by their cognitive bias (Zeni, Buckley, Mumford & Griffith, 2015). Utilitarianism is one of the frameworks that can be used to address ethical dilemmas. Utilitarianism holds that decision makers should take alternatives that maximize the happiness of the majority of the stakeholders (Choe & Min, 2011 and Marques, 2015). This presentation will discuss how the 8-step ethical decision making process can be applied when addressing a dilemma using the utilitarianism framework. The presentation will also guide the executives of Toyota on how to address the negative publicity associated with the production of cars with faulty acceleration system.
There are a lot of ramifications on the ethical justification or condemnation of any attempt to force changes sexual orientation on anyone, by agencies, institutions, or organizations. To untangle this complex, is necessary to understand exactly what ‘ethics’ represent, and also what sexual orientation is all about, in line with the expectations of the work place. How sexual orientation could be in conflict with ambitions, goals and expectations of agencies, institutions, or organization, and especially to the extent of attracting punishment or suppression is very useful to know.
Recognize moral issue: The issues in Fresh Taste NZ Ltd. are rude behaviour of employer with employees, ignorance of basic ethical practices by workers and providing less salary to the workers etc. All these things create ethical disputes at workplace.