Ethical Egoism Provides A Satisfactory Moral Theory

Ethical Egoism is when oneself is the motivation or the goal of one’s own interests and actions. In this Ethical Theory, your moral duty is to focus on yourself and not on others. According to Rand, Egoism gives you the right to be entitled to your own happiness. An Egoist usually has a resolution to conflict and tends to argue less caring. Ethical Egoism doesn’t focus on the morality of things, it focuses more on self-interest. Sacrificing yourself interests for the greater good of others defeats the fundamental value of one’s life to oneself. This is the argument that is being portrayed by Ayn Rand and the author of “The Fountainhead.”

Egoism is a teleological theory of ethics that sets the ultimate criterion of morality in some nonmoral value (i.e. happiness or welfare) that results from acts (Pojman 276). It is contrasted with altruism, which is the view that one's actions ought to further the interests or good of other people, ideally to the exclusion of one's own interests (Pojman 272). This essay will explain the relation between psychological egoism and ethical egoism. It will examine how someone who believes in psychological egoism explains the apparent instances of altruism. And it will discuss some arguments in favor of universal ethical egoism, and exam Pojman's critque of arguments for and against universal ethical egoism.

Some aspects of ethical egoism in order to explain it in detail, are that ethical egoism rejects ordinary assumption that other people's interests count for their own sake, while also claiming we have no moral duty except to do what is best for ourselves. While one might be obligated to help others, it is only as a means to our long term self interest, which makes it not genuine kindness; instead it is pure selfishness that so happened to benefit another person. Helping others is right only if and only if it serves our own advantage in either the short or long term. The basic difference between EE and PE is the nature of the theories and whether we as human beings can decide against acting selfishly. According to EE, which is based on how humans out to behave, we do. According to EE, which is a descriptive theory about how humans must behave, we do not. The main support for EE is that the world will collectively be better if everyone does what is best for only him or her, since everyone is doing what is best for him or her. The main flaw with EE is its arbitrariness based on the fact that no one is more or less important than anyone else and deserves no more or less help; so to act as if we are all more important than everyone else is flawed in its own

However, the actions or rules that ethical egoism follows at times may not be in their best interest. There may be situations that the most good can be accomplished only by performing an immoral act. In such cases, the theory would then condone for a person to steal, rape, or murder to promote what is in that person’s best-interest. As a result, ethical egoism contradicts our moral judgments, because promoting one’s own interest, at the cost of harming another human being should not be the only consideration to determining what is morally correct (Vaughn).

According to Vaughn, ethical egoism is the normative theory with the view that “the right action is the one that advances one’s best interests.”(Vaughn 78) Each person, according to this theory, “puts his or her own

Ethical Egoism is a philosophical doctrine in which it is asserted that all people ought to act according to their own self-interest. In the case of sweatshops, ethical egoism would assert that those who decide to work in sweatshops or those who set them up, if acting according to their self-interest, are doing what they ought to do. There are various forms of ethical egoism but nearly all of them can be argued to not be complete. If we assert that man has the autonomy and should act in their own interest, then we must be aware that man can act in their own self-interest but still act in another person’s self-interest. Assuming that man acts altruistically is difficult,

Ethical egoism and ordinary moral thinking are different from one another. In ethical egoism thinking the major idea is that people will do what they ought to do for self-interest; whereas, ordinary moral thinking is based on people doing based on what is right or wrong. In this situation, the ethical egoism is the unfavorable way to think, act, and experience life. When people have to think about their action in terms of self-interest, it creates a culture that people are focused on preserving themselves which fosters selfishness. Ordinary moral thinking makes a person elevate their acts in terms of right or wrong. This makes people think about others. It also establishes expectations about how the world should operate in terms of what is

Utilitarianism and ethical egoism are a complete opposite of ethical systems. Ethical egoism stating that unselfishness does not exist, and that is the answer to the absolute form of ethics, whereas singer argues that being unselfish is the key to obtaining the true form of righteous morals. I will contend that, Browne’s point of ethics is far superior than of singers, and provides an answer for all morals.

On the other hand, ethical egoism differentiates from the ethical altruism in that while the latter is concerned with the welfare of others; the concern of the former is for the promotion of the interests of oneself. Moseley (n.p.) notes that ethical egoism is a normative theory that shares in the notion that “the promotion of one’s good is in accordance with morality” (Moseley n.p.). This particular source notes that there is a robust and weak angle of the promotion of one’s good. The strong angle has it that; “it is always moral to promote one’s good” (Moseley n.p.). On the other hand, the weaker

Ethical egoism is “the ethical view that one ought to do whatever and only whatever is in one’s own maximum interest, benefit, advantage, or

Contrarily, opponents of the Ethical Egoism believe that it violates moral code. One can go to any extent to get what one wants, even if one has to kill another person. Take for an instance, someone working in a firm who wants to become the vice president, or even president of the firm by all means, may go to extreme extent to achieve his/ her pursuit. The person may not mind humiliating, blackmailing or even machinating to fire another person, just to get the position. Such a person plays deaf to winds of caution because of selfish interest. In this instance, Ethical Egoism rejects cautionary measures that support morality with the sole aim of shining.

Explain why relativism and egoism pose a challenge to the possibility of rational discussion in ethics. Using the readings in our text, show how these doctrines might be challenged.

Ethical egoism is defined roughly by stating how people do things or react to what is in their best interest. This theory gets its meaning because the word “egoism” derives from the Latin term “ego”, meaning “I” in English (Moseley). The motivation of ethical egoism depends on how the situation will act upon one’s self-interest. In this paper, I am going to defend and explain that babies are born with morality of the ethical egoism theory.

In business, Egoism theory is the most used ethical theory. Egoism is one of the oldest philosophical ideas; however, in the last few centuries it has proven to become more influential in modern economics. Egoism is an action that is morally right if the decision-maker freely decides to pursue their (short-term) desires or their (long-term) interests. In other words, the pursuit of an individual’s interest is also beneficial to society as a whole.

Many people have argued that all ethical decisions, especially ones that deal with the environment, should be made per the ethical egoist’s standpoint. However, I believe that is wrong, and in the end, will destroy our planet. Ethical egoist are people who make moral decisions based on their own interest, and the only thing to have moral standing is “me”. Basically, meaning that “I ought to do this, for what is best in my interest and my benefit.” I believe this is bad for the environment because, not everyone thinks the same way. Not everyone, views and values things the same way. So, if from an ethical egoist standpoint, people would do what they want when they want, based on their own needs, their own values, which in turn leads to the