Ethical Issues In The Invisible Man

Ethical dilemmas occur when there is a disagreement about a situation and all parties involved question how they should behave based on their individual ethical morals. (Newman & Pollnitz, 2005). The dilemma that I will be addressing in this essay involves Michael, recently employed male educator working in the nursery, and parents of a baby enrolled at the centre. The parents have raised concerns about male educators changing their child’s nappy as they have cultural practices that do not allow this practice to take place. This situation is classed as an ethical dilemma as there is a dispute between cultural beliefs and legal requirements within the workplace. There are four parties involved (parents, child, educator and director), all

1. The Mayor of a large city was given a free membership in an exclusive golf club by people who have received several city contracts. He also accepted gifts from organizations that have not done business with the City but might in the future. The gifts ranged from $200 tickets to professional sports events to designer watches and jewelry.

Towards the end of the book “Invisible Man” by Ralph Ellison, the narrator who remains unnamed thought the entire book, risks his life to save a briefcase filled with seemingly random assorted items. But later in the book the narrator is forced to burn the items in his briefcase in order to find his way out of a sewer he gets stuck in. Closer reading reveals that the items in his briefcase are more than random assorted items, but instead are symbols. Each one of those symbols represents a point in the narrator’s life where he is either betrayed or made “invisible” by the people around him. Through the book the two main recurring themes are betrayal and invisibility and the narrator keeps these symbols with him because they represent who he

During times of crisis, we as American citizens, may be unlikely to consider the issues with being supervised by the government (Orwell). After all, it’s for the greater good, and for the sake of national security from terrorist threats. It’s not quite that simple. If we are to abandon our rights for the sake of safety in our country we would have little to no privacy. Based on how much the internet, text messages, and other monitorable services are used in daily life. People shouldn’t be so quick to give up their privacy rights in the name of national security.

With new technology rolling out onto the market seemingly everyday, the privacy of many is disappearing and has even become nonexistent. With many scandals over the past few years, government agencies have been accused of using these new communication resources as means to keep a watchful eye over their citizens. This is the very topic discussed by Peter Singer in his essay “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets”. Singer discusses the benefits and pitfalls that have come from these communication innovations, going in depth on the tactics and resources used by civilians as well as governments to keep track of each other. Singer presents strong premises that argue for the conservation of the individual privacy rights while also arguing for governments to become more transparent, creating an overall controversial element to his essay, as he is only half invested in transparency as a whole between civilians and the body that governs them, that comes off as somewhat unconvincing as the two arguments contradict each other.

The story The Invisible Man is written by Ralph Ellison. The author takes his personal experiences as an ignored man and creates this character that shows the characteristics of a man whom few people would stop to acknowledge. This story can be seen as a symbol of an educated black man whose life has been controlled and oppressed by a white society. Throughout the story one will notice that the man is nameless. The is because the narrator in The Invisible Man is invisible not only to others but himself as well because of racism and trying to live up to expectations of others. There are certain tools that are given to him by outsiders and things he will use that will ultimately develop him into student and man. The author has written about events that made the invisible man who he was. It is important to notice that the invisible man has been searching for his identity the whole time and will later discover that his identity is in those things he has always had.

After the publication of this book, one event was when Griffin was standing by his car when his tire he had a flat, and a group of men came to approach him. He thought they were going to help him, but instead they dragged him from his car and beat him with chains and left him for dead. It took him a while to get healed from this horrific assault, but it was not just a random beating. It was because Griffin exposed the truth, and many did not want the truth to be exposed. They wanted everything to stay hidden and undercover. No one likes the truth because it’s a hard pill to swallow and people reacted violently to this truth.

Before he was known as The Invisible Man his name was Griffin. He Once was a human but then he discovered a formula that makes him invisible. He is a mad-scientist that over the years has been doing a lot of experiments such as, travelling through time and converting animals into humans. He doesn’t belong with people in the community, he doesn’t have family or friends and he lives in a world where people do not care about him at all and all he does is keeps himself isolated. Now he has to see if being invisible makes him powerful or becomes his worst nightmare.

The idea of double consciousness, termed by W.E.B. Du Bois, for African Americans deals with the notion that one’s self has duality in being black and American. It is the attempt to reconcile two cultures that make up the identity of black men and women. One can only see through the eyes of another. A veil exists in this idea, where one has limits in how he or she can see or be seen. This individual is invisible to the onlookers of the veil, and those onlookers may be invisible to the individual. This then alters how one can truly interpret their conscious. This concept is one that has been explored in various themes of literature,

“Brad is a production engineer at a bicycle company and part of his job includes inspecting broken bikes and drafting the design repairs for their repair” (Bartlett). Brad is considering replacing a broken brake cable with a more durable material, even though the customer did not request it in their order and specifically requested that “No aesthetic changes be made to the bike” (Bartlett). Brad’s manager suggests that his considered actions would go against the company’s policy of “The customer is always right.” Should Brad disobey the manager and the customer to possibly lose his job or go along with

The theme I chose for this novel is about a man searching for his identity and not sure about where to turn to define himself.

Michael H., a 68-year-old man, was admitted for exploratory surgery of his abdomen. He is frail, and his attending physician describes him as “emotionally labile.” Marcy R. is a social worker at BFL General Hospital, who is assigned to the unit that Michael H has been admitted. After Michael’s surgery, Marcy R. was approached by Michael H.’s daughter, Ellen B. in which Ellen has told Marcy that her father’s physician had just informed her that the lab report from the exploratory surgery shows that her father has terminal cancer. Ellen said that she and the family are in shock and they have decided that they not want the hospital staff to tell her father about the terminal nature of his cancer once he recovers from anesthesia. In this essay, I will discuss the ethical dilemma of “to tell Michael or not to tell him he has terminal cancer. He has the right to confidentiality by not withholding information from him when he has been diagnosed with terminal cancer, informed consent, and self-determination.

Griffin and Dr. Kemp are similar in that they ambitiously want sole notoriety for their passionate work in bizarre and idiosyncratic aspects of science, though their main difference lies in their approach and demeanor towards achieving that exclusive notoriety, one seeks to be renowned while the other seeks infamy for the distinct purposeful use of their discoveries. They both share a self-centeredness to isolates them from current society, one seeking to cure his self-induced condition and the other seeking a fellowship with the astute Royal Society. While Dr. Kemp displays a cool, calm, and collected demeanor, Griffin is the direct opposite in the fact, the he has no control over his negative emotions and acts on them instinctively which leads to his demise at the end of the story. He seemingly gets more violent and has no control over his negative behaviors. Dr. Kemp is a respect decent man contributing positively to society whereas Griffin is an odd duck, lonely, spiteful individual.

The novel Invisible Man centers on the narrator as struggles to find himself as a young adult. The first person narrator throughout the novel is faced with an upheaval of antagonists. The antagonists are white men, extremist groups, and previous mentors who disagree with the narrator’s point of view, and or his actions. These people continually use him for their own purposes which cause a drastic character development for the narrator. In the end, the narrator realizes the best way to accomplish change is to undergo an invisible facade; by that he must have numerous personas on hand to cater to different people’s ego. Basically, to be the invisible man is to know yours and other figures purposes to use this information for your own means.

The Invisible Man has many possible themes. There are multiple examples of different themes in the novel. Most of them can almost fall under the same idea. The main theme for the novel is how excessive greed can have unintended consequences. The main character, Griffin, goes mad with the power of being invisible. It gets to the point that he is not even trying to just stay hidden anymore, he is just trying to cause as much mayhem in the country as possible.