1 Explain the Trolley Driver, Bystander at the Switch, Fat Man, Transplant, & Hospital scenarios discussed in the "The Trolley Problem" reading. In doing so, address what the ethical issue(s) are in each of these scenarios. The trolley problem can be expanded to discuss a number of related ethical dilemmas, all referring to the conflicts inherent in utilitarianism and consequentialist ethics. The problem with the trolley driver scenario is that the driver is faced with a choice of whether to infringe
The trolley problems consist of hypothetical scenarios in which you, as a bystander, must decide who to save in a variety of set ups. For example, you, as a bystander, can switch the track of the trolley to hit one worker rather than five. In another example, do you push one person off of a bridge to stop the trolley from hitting five workers, thus saving five individuals as opposed to one? Or do you let the trolley run its course and hit the five workers? These questions are useful in bioethics
Introduction This report is aimed at the ethical dilemma faced in Tesco. Tesco is one of the biggest food and grocery retailers in the world. Recently Tesco had approximately 4,811 in the world and it employing over 470,200 people. Moreover, Tesco also provided approximately 7,000 products, it including food and non-food products (Tesco, 2012). This report is on all pertaining to Tesco ethical issues. The main dilemmas that are facing by Tesco are the product and service problem and these dilemmas are invented
The trolley issue features a central pressure between two schools of good idea. The utilitarian point of view manages that most fitting activity is the one that accomplishes the best useful for the best number. In the meantime, the deontological point of view affirms that specific activities – like killing a blameless individual – are quite recently wrong, regardless of the possibility that they have great outcomes. In the two forms of the trolley issue over, utilitarian's say you should give up
When I think of making ethical decisions, I think of doing what’s right, but what exactly is the right thing and how do we define it? As humans we are all brought up under different circumstances, therefore we tend to distinguish from right and wrong in many different ways, especially at a young age when we first start to understand our moral behavior. This difference between the way we determine what’s right and what’s wrong is what makes it difficult for us humans to have the same understanding
Judith Jarvis Thomson presents an ethical dilemma entitled The Trolley Problem in The Monist. The problem describes a situation in which a trolley car is moving quickly and out of control on a train track towards five people who are tied to the tracks; you have the power to pull a lever, change the direction of the trolley car and save those five people – at the expense of the life of one person who is on the track the car was diverted to (Thomson 1397). The choice to be made is not just about
Utilitarianism and The Trolley Problem Utilitarianism is an ethical principle that states that everyone should act in the way that will bring out the most good for the majority. If this were true then most people would make the decision to save five people even if it required murder or one. The Trolley Problem dives right into this core issue by describing a decision making scenario. Utilitarianism is damaged as an ethical theory because it oversimplifies this decision, and other decisions like
and able to perform many calculations before we are even aware of danger” (The Robot Car of Tomorrow May Just Be Programmed to Hit You”, 3). Nevertheless, there are many issues that arise when you take the wheel out of the hands of a human and put it into the hands of an algorithm, pre-programmed AI. Many intricate problems emerge with self-driving cars, but they all stem from the idea of ethics, what is morally right and wrong. To try to get a better understanding for how these autonomous cars
it will discuss on the William MacAskill’s strong claim. Secondly, the paper will illustrate on harm-based reasons. The third issues that the document will address are the Trolley problem and Tactical Bombing case and try to relate these two cases to the harm-based reasons. Finally, the paper will provide statements that support strong claim relating to Trolley problem and Tactical Bombing cases. In “Replaceability, Career Choice, and Making a Difference”, William talks about choosing a career.
What is Good? When people discuss goodness, we often associate it with the way people act. More specifically we associate goodness with morality. To be a good person a person has to uphold the morals of society. The problem with this is very often morals of one society can differ from person to person and if one society can’t agree on their morals how are several societies going to agree on one set of morals. The fact is, in theory, there should be one set of morals but in reality that doesn 't