Ethical Philosophy Of Consequentialism Essay

explains the consequentialist as the idea of looks to the consequence of an action in order to evaluate it. Even if the intention of the action is wrong or violent someone’s right, the its result for the general good is still the focus. In the other hand, deontological is more about the idea of only right or wrong. There is no intention or consequence, just with the moralistic ethics. One example of contrast he used in the book is the idea of utilitarian. Utilitarian can be express in the prospect of consequentialist ethics, because it will look at individual situation and create a decision that will benefit the greater people. However, the same situation in the idea of deontological

Consequentialism and non-consequentialism are both action based ethical frameworks that people can use to make ethical judgments. Consequentialism is based on examining the consequences of one’s actions as opposed to non-consequentialism which is focused on whether the act is right or wrong regardless of the outcome (Burgh, Field & Freakley, 2006). The three sub-categories of consequentialism are altruism, utilitarianism and egoism.

Consequentialism refers to the idea that what is morally good or bad is all based on the consequences of one’s actions. It is derived from the Theory of Right Action which is a part of

Utilitarianism is the highest principle of morality and to increase the welfare of happiness is to balance pleasure over pain (Sandel). Utilitarian actions are correct if they promote the welfare of the greatest amount and wrong if it decreases that welfare or well-being(Baggini and Fosl, 57).

Thus, consequentialist and utilitarianism are directly related due to the fact the overall consequences of one’s actions is the direct result of defining both term. In moral terms, utilitarian means to recognize that the greater

UTILITARIANISM: Utilitarianism argues that one should act in a way that produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

Utilitarianism argues that, given a set of choices, the act we should choose is that which produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice.

Act consequentialism is the philosophical belief that an action is right if it brings about the best consequences or state of affairs out of all of the actions that are available to an agent. For example, a man comes to your house and tells you to tell him where your father is so that he can kill him. The act consequentialist would say that it is perfectly acceptable to lie about the whereabouts of your father in order to save his life. This is because telling the truth would result in your father’s death, your family members suffering, as well as the pain and guilt that you would feel by being ultimately responsible for his death. Thereby in this example lying would bring the best state of affairs out of all the actions that the agent can think of at that given time.

The chapter highlights three different ethical theories. These are egoism, utilitarianism, and deontology. Egoism is defined by the person advocating self-interest while making ethical decisions. The book criticizes this theory for its promotion of selfishness. After all, can ethical decisions be made if a person acts only on their best behalf regardless of the people involved, or the outcome?

After looking at the definition of the ethical type of Consequentialism, I would like to give a short example in my own words what I understand Consequentialism is. Consequentialism is the ethical reasoning that would apply to a situation where the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Or what is less evil or bad in any particular situation ? You would make that choice based on the ethical type Consequentialism. So in my life I believe that I have had to make ethical decisions based on this ethical type. Whether it be at work at home with the family or with friends.

It comprises of two kinds: consequentialist and nonconsequentialist (Hartman & Desjardin, 2008). Based on consequentialist theory, whether an action is right or wrong is solely determined by the results. An action is regarded as right only if the result is good, adversely, an action is said to be wrong when the consequence is bad (Shaw, Barry, Issa, & Catley, 2013).

Utilitarian Ethics is the theory that "an action is morally right if and only if it produces at least as much good (utility) for

The three arguments for Ethical Egoism discussed are: 1) Altruism is self-defeating; 2) Ethical Egoism as the moral theory of a rational agent; 3) Ethical Egoism is compatible with common sense morality

Utilitarianism comes from the word ‘utility’ or usefulness. The idea is that as long as something done is useful to society at large, it is moral no matter what had to be done to achieve it. It is the view of the best consequences for the most amount of people.

There are 4 main issues that being raised from this article. One of the main issues that can be raised from this article is consequentialism. Consequentialism is the kind of normative ethical theories holding that the results of one's administration are the final basis for any judgment about