Ethical Relativism And Ethical Pluralism

Your preferred ethical lens depends on your core values – the ideals that propel you to action. Each ethical lens emphasizes underlying core values in a slightly different way.

Absolutists would have to condemn a mother who steals food for her starving children because in their eyes all stealing is wrong, whereas Relativists can say stealing is wrong usually but as the mother needed to feed her children, what she did was right and should therefore not be condemned.

All the ethical theories are going to be defined using The Philosopher’s Way by John Chaffee. Chaffee defines ethical subjectivism as, “The view that the ultimate moral authority is the individual or the ‘subject’” (386). Next,

Ethical relativism and ethical objectivism, what are they and how have we come understand them in our time? These two topics have been a center point for many arguments weather you actually talk about it or not. As much as we like to argue in this world in our daily lives we fail to see what stance we hold. This might be because we aren’t educated enough to realize it or it just might be because we don’t care. We will be discussing the differences between ethical relativisms and ethical objectivism so we can get a better grasp and understanding of these two topics. Ethical relativism is mainly based on what the individual person or society believe. It is what they see as morally right and wrong. Ethical objectivism is the view that some moral

However, both of those steps depend on knowing about the Four Ethical Lenses—four very different ways that people approach ethical decision making. Using the concepts of the Four Ethical Lenses helps clarify the differences in ethical expectations and resolve conflict.

Ethical issues are faced everyday in the modern society, a person with morals and ethics is confronted by these issues in daily basis and has to make ethical choices to solve these issues. But some times these ethical choices are so hard to make that they become in ethical dilemmas. In today’s world ethical dilemmas are on the rise due to there are so many different races, religion, ethnicity and social classes. Some ethical dilemmas have more significant than others because they are more vulnerable and sensitive. In our modern society diversity plays a key role in our work place, schools, hospitals and other public places. Different race and different religion of people come from different background all in one place, which makes it more significant to cause an ethical dilemma. Different

Objectivist → Holds that the same moral duties hold for everyone, but allows some flexibility for how a duty may apply in specific situations.

Ethics are only based on what a group finds to be right or wrong as well as what a person might find right or wrong, like taking another person's life most will agree that is wrong and should not be done, that would be a group ethic, while someone may also add that killing of animals is also wrong that would be a personal ethics.

Theoretical Perspectives Decision Making Framework is suitable to making ethical decisions. According to Bonde & Firenze (2013) the decision about right or wrong can be difficult and might be related to individual context. Ethical thinking other than critical thinking is needed in order to find the most suitable alternatives to be implemented in reaching the expected

Ethical Relativism, Cultural Relativism, and Ethical Absolutism Ethical relativists argue that what is morally right or wrong may vary in fundamental way from person to person or from culture to culture. In other words, as Robert Arrington (1983) argues, we cannot simply say that a moral judgement is true for all purposes, persons, and cultures-we can assert only that it is true for a particular person or social group. Cultural relativism is a form of relativism that claims that moral beliefs and practices vary from culture to culture. It is important to understand, however that cultural relativists do not argue that certain acts or practices are right or wrong in a particular culture.

Ethics strives to determine what is best for the most people in order to enable them to live a happy, productive life. In our democratic society, we based our constitution on ethical, objectivistic principles. Ethics based on relativist views, cannot distinguish between what is good and evil. The ethical relativist believes that what is right for me, even if someone else finds it repulsive, is still fine because it is my moral belief.

Two of the moral theories are relativism and absolutism, but what does this mean? Relativism is define by Wilkins are in short anti-legalist and anti absolutist (85). Relativism and absolutism are a dispute over the moral principles in the world. It is not that they disagree with what about is right and wrong or the moral principles behind them. It is that they are however against how principles should be held. They are in complete contrast to one another, even though their own right can justify both.

An ethical relativist believes that moral rules differs from one culture to another. From their point of view, a person should only be held accountable to their own culture’s practices and beliefs. In this situation, an ethical relativist might argue that we should respect our cultural differences and should not impose our view of morality onto others. Another way is to be a moral absolutist. A moral absolutist believes there is an objective universal moral standard that everyone is held accountable to. Unlike an ethical relativist, this standard applies to everyone at all times, regardless of their culture (13). This is trickier because it depends on their ideals. The absolutism of vegetarian well say that it is morally wrong to eat all animals regardless of the cultural differences and circumstances of that

A discussion of moral theories must begin with a discussion of the two extremes of ethical thinking, absolutism and relativism. Moral Absolutism is the belief that there are absolute standards where moral questions are judged and can be deemed right or wrong, regardless of the context. Steadfast laws of the universe, God, nature itself are the forces that deem an action right or wrong. A person’s actions rather than morals and motivations are important in an Absolutism proposition. Moral Relativism states, that the moral propositions are based on Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the

This is a doctrine that bases its arguments in the fact that there are no universal absolute truths in ethics and that what is morally right or wrong varies from person to person or from society to society. Ethical relativism is a similar concept, based specifically on the ethics of a culture and how they are related to those of other cultures (Kluckhohn, 2011). Herodotus, the Greek historian advanced this view when he observed that different societies have different customs and that each person thinks that his customs are