Ethical Theories Of An Individual

Kantian ethics is a subcategory of Deontological Ethics, which is the rightness of actions. Kantian ethics uses the concept of categorical imperative, which states that you should act in ways such that you can rationally will your acts to be a universal law. Therefore, that which is good, not that which is bad, can be universalizable. Kant believed that all people should act in a way so that you never treat another person as a means, but only as an end onto themselves. This means that if someone were to perform an act, they would do so without concern for the consequence, but rather because they believe it is in fact what they should do.

Then Kantianism according to the books is, “ a theory asserting that the morally right action is the one done in accordance with the categorical imperative.” (Vaughn 71) Also

Online technologies are beneficial to the modern world. It can improve a person’s education, business, and helps in everyday life hassles. It has become an essential part of the way that people live and it is very likely that people would be a loss without it. In “Ethics and the New Genetics,” the Dalai Lama claims that to ethically use new technological advancements we need to develop a “moral compass”. Peter Singer, in “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets,” discusses whether new technology and “openness” makes our lives better, or if the lack of privacy takes away the rights of individuals. Both authors discuss how technology is advancing very rapidly and can significantly have major pros and cons to society. The two authors, however, have different viewpoints in which how the society can determine when technology has become ethical. Dalai Lama is firm believer that technology is evolving so fast that ethics could hardly keep up with it. He addresses how people should have ethical standards when dealing with the internet. Thus, he is directly proving to us how he would want society to ethically determine when and how technology should be used. Yet, on another spectrum, Peter Singer argues that although ethically, internet is invading our privacy, this invasion of privacy is the only way that the public is safe and people should brutally discover the truth about everything but somehow it can cause harm. Peter Singer and Dalai Lama both agree how the new online

technology, and with the latest moral or ethical trends in society. However, these new trends and

With the changing social landscape that naturally follows changes in technology comes a new wave of ethical issues. These issues must first be addressed and then resolved for computers, technology, and the internet in order to have a positive influence in society. Electronic communications, internet privacy, and computer crimes adds a new layer of ethical issues that plague those who use computers and embrace technology on a daily basis. By identifying societal issues in computer usages, you can take a stand for electronic ethics (Ireland, 2017).

* Kantian Ethics- the belief that people should be treated as ends and never as means to the ends of others

Moreover, Kantianism is the ethical theory that German philosopher Immanuel Kant ascribed. According to the theory, the morality of an action depends on whether they fulfill one's duty. Kant believed that the supreme principle of morality was the categorical imperative. He described categorical imperatives as commands one should always follow, regardless of one’s desires. A categorical imperative is formulated if its maxim - the principle one gives themselves when they are about to do something - is universalizable. To determine whether a maxim is universalizable there is a three part test: First, one should state what they intend to do and why they intend to do it. Second, imagine a world where everyone supports and acts on the maxim. Third,

My first takeaway was ethics and moral reasoning. Ethics can be defined as a standard to determine whether its right or wrong based on belief. In contrast, moral reasoning or morality can refer to as customs and practices of an individual or a social group (Satyanarayana, 2009). Similarly, both ethics and morality can be based on

From my understanding, ethics are the moral ideas that influence a person‘s or group’s behavior. Like the world around us, ethics have evolved over time. In earlier years, researchers started becoming smarter because they began to conduct experiments and various tests by using human and animal subjects. This helps us understand why we behave the way we do. There is however, a major difference in the way we conduct experiments today compared to back then.

Unlike Utilitarianism however, Kantianism states that ethics is a purely a priori discipline, thus, independent of experience, and that ethical rules can only be found through pure reason. Also contrary to Utilitarianism, Kantianism asserts that the moral worth of an action should be judged on its motive and the action itself, and not on its consequences. Based on these ideas, Kantianism propose that an action is good only if it performed out a 'good will '; which is the only thing that is good, in and of itself. To act out of a 'good will ', one must act in accordance with a categorical imperative. According to Kant there is only one categorical imperative, which is to "act only on that maxim in which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law" (Kant, 528); and can also be formulated as "act in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never simply as means, but always at the same time as an end" (Kant, 532). Essentially, the categorical imperative states that your actions must not result in a practical contradiction, which can be determined by conceptualizing all other people performing the same act. To illustrate, if I were

Kantianism is a moral theory that derives universal, absolute rules of morality by starting with the human qualities of autonomy and rationality. Immanuel Kant, the creator of the theory, believed that this combination of autonomy and rationality has infinite value. [1] As such, Kant argued that utilitarian viewpoints are irrational because they may ignore this infinite value by aiming to increase the happiness of many through the sacrificing of the happiness of a few, thus treating people merely as means to an ends. [1] Kant therefore argued that morality should not be about measuring outcomes by pleasure or pain, but by a good will. In fact, he believed that morality could not be achieved outside of the qualities

According to James Fieser (2017) ethics is a theory or system dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions (Utm.edu). Ethics is concerned with other people's interests, with the interests of society, with God's interests, and with "ultimate goods"; if a group believes that a particular activity is "wrong" it can then use morality as the justification for attacking those who practice that activity (bbc.co.uk).

There are eight major ethical theories the ones that were focused on in the video were deontological and utilitarian. The deontological theory is the sense of obligation, that someone feels that it their morally duty to do the right thing. The utilitarian theory is that people act and behave so that they will produce happiness for the greatest number of people. These two different ethical theories are ways that people behave and think is morally correct.

Former soldier and media commentator Ralph Peters once said: “The great paradox of the 21st century is that, in this age of powerful technology, the biggest problems we face internationally are problems of the human soul.” As technology continues to rapidly evolve, ethics in technology has become an increasingly prevalent issue. A common misconception maintains that everyone has the same set of ethics, but the reality is quite different. No human is exactly the same, therefore it stands to reason that not everyone would share the same opinion on what is and is not ethical behavior. This essay is an exploration into the five main schools of thought when discussing ethics in technology. While there are many issues that these systems address, I have, for simplicities sake, chosen to discuss only the issues of the human right of free speech and intellectual property rights.

Computer ethics is the systematic study of the ethical and social impact of computers in the information society. The ethical and social issues under discussion involve the acquisition, distribution, storage, processing and dissemination of digital data in information systems and how individuals and groups interact with these systems and data. The moral considerations of computer ethics are related to the responsibility and accountability of the computer users and professionals with regard to the design and implementation of information systems. Computer ethics also includes the study of the policies, rules, and legislations that refer to a particular situation and the alternative ethical decisions, as well as the social implications of these alternatives. Computers are a special technology and they raise some special ethical issues. Computer ethics are the moral guidelines that govern the use of computers and information system. These computer ethics are divided into two parts namely the analysis of nature and social impact of computer technology and the corresponding formulation and justification of policies for the ethical use of such technology. Computer technology is the most appropriate term