Ethical Theories Of Relativism And The Ku Klux Kalen

Thesis: Arising from the growing development for the equality of African-American peoples in the United States, those who continued to support the alt-right became increasingly aware of their decreasing racial superiority, effectively resulting in their insecurity becoming the basis for the formulation of the Ku Klux Klan, violently targeting the increasingly powerful minorities.

Ethnocentrism can be defined as an individual’s belief that an ethnic group or cultural with which they identify is superior to all others. There are many people throughout the United States that have this same belief. Whether it be racist conservatives that believe in white power or liberals that hate putting toys in happy meals (The). This is what I like to call a “Hate-first” mindset. In history there have been many group or organization with this type of mindset, such as, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, The Nazi party, Westboro Baptist Church, the list could go on and on. Many of these organizations are terror groups. Some of those groups are just hateful, arrogant, loud-mouthed people. The KKK is an example of a terrorist organization with a hate first mindset. The Alt-right is an example of a hateful, arrogant, and loud-mouthed groups. Many people believe that the Alt-right movement may be a “call-back” to the KKK. Though the KKK and the Alt-right may share some of the same ideology, I do not believe that the Alt-Right is a call back to the KKK.

In philosophy there are many theories that philosophers argue, James Rachels argues the main points of moral relativism, where he describes the differences within cultures. Philosophers attempt to prove their theories to be true, but it can be complicated because if someone proves one premise false of your argument then the entire argument is invalid. There are different types of relativisms that favor moral relativism, such as, personal belief relativism, societal belief relativism, and then there is the cultural beliefs argument. All of these topics of relativism fall into the same category as moral relativism, meaning they all have the same general statement. Which is one cannot declare what is morally right or morally wrong. Moral relativism is the umbrella term and the others are points that can affect it. Moral Relativism claims that there is no objective truth concerning morality, therefore no one can draw a line between what is right or wrong.

The third historical interpretation argues that the Klan was originally established as an organization as a result of a struggling plantation system. This particular perspective offers a differing view which allows for the reader to establish an understanding of the evolving interpretations of the Ku Klux Klan as an organization. Michael W. Fitzgerald, a historian in Reconstruction and agricultural history, makes an argument in his article, “The Ku Klux Klan: Property Crime and the Plantation System in Reconstruction Alabama” (1997), that the Klan originally emerged as a result of labor turmoil following the Emancipation Proclamation. Fitzgerald describes labor turmoil during Reconstruction as a conflict involving wealthy plantation owners

Yes: Shawn Lay rejects the view of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) as a radical fringe group comprised of marginal men and instead characterizes the KKK of the 1920s as a mainstream, grassroots organization that promoted traditional values of law, order, and social morality that appealed to Americans across the nation.

The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866 by a group of former Confederate veterans in Pulaski, Tennesse. The first two words in the groups name supposedly derived from the Greek word "kyklos" which translates to circle. There first leader (known in the Klan as "grand wizard")Nathan Bedford Forrest was a former Confederate general. The group worked to establish what they called the " Invisible Empire of the South" Over the course of four short years had spread to almost every southern state. It was viewed primarily by white 's in the south as there resistance to the Republican Party 's Reconstruction policies that worked toward equality for blacks. The Ku Klux Klan (referred to

The Ku Klux Klan was known as the biggest hate group in American History, and they are responsible for thousands of innocent blacks’ deaths. The Ku Klux Klan made it very hard for the blacks, Catholics, Jews, immigrants, and homosexuals to live a normal life. The Klan made them live in fear.

The brutal violence acts performed by the Ku Klux Klan members were often sexual violence. The Klan said to be protecting the white women from black men. As the article Black Victims of Violence states, “... some had no moral qualms about their members sexually abusing or mutilating black men and women in order to show their authority” (para. 3). The violence became worse over time and the Klansmen started to get out of hand. Even the “Grand Wizard,” also known as Nathan Bedford Forrest, saw their crimes as unnecessary and unjust. As read in Hatred and Profits: Under the Hood of the Ku Klux Klan by Roland

Klux Klan was a necessary and reasonable reaction to the foundation of "negro militias" and to the claim

Racism has been deep-rooted in American history. Racism that arose in the 1920s involved infamous race riots, lynching, the Sweet Case, and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan. However, out of all these other factors, the Ku Klux Klan has left a huge impact on American history.

By 1915 the Klan was not only fighting against blacks, they were against Roman Catholics ,Jews, foreigners.

The Klu Klux Klan was actually started in 1865 by six men in Pulaski, Tennessee and their white, hooded guise was meant to mock ghosts. The name came from the Greek word kuklos which means circle and the Scottish word clan. During its beginnings the Klan was thought to be a passing guerilla organization which would last only as long as “Northern carpetbaggers, illiterate Negros, and Southern renegades ruled the Southern states” (Secret Societies). By 1868 there were five-hundred and fifty thousand member of the Klan, also known as Palefaces, the White Brotherhood, the White League, Knights of the White Camellia. Forrest realized he was losing control of the Klan in 1869 and ordered disbandment, an order that was never followed. At one

Specifically on the topic of the Ku Klux Klan, the SPLC has challenged many of the groups’ leaders, such as Louis Beam, and Robert Sheldon, a Grand Dragon and Imperial Wizard of the hate groups respectively. Louis Beam, a white nationalist, was causing chaos in Louisiana with his Klan, as well as creating the Texas Reserve Army, a local militia of men to fight against the government, as Beam was a

The two most prominent arguments for moral relativism include the argument of cultural diversity as well as the argument of tolerance. When it comes to cultural diversity, relativists argue

From a relativist's perspective, moral values are only applicable within certain cultures and societies. Something that may be viewed as morally correct in the United States could be unethical in Zimbabwe and vice versa. For example, in Somalia, it is acceptable, or moral for a family to kill a female family member if she is raped, while here in the United States the murder of a family member is viewed as extremely unethical and cruel. A more simplistic example of this is the fact that it is not unethical in American culture to consume beef, while in India it is viewed as unethical. The reason for this is because of the diverse cultures and their own set of moral standards. This theory states that there are many values and ideas that can be considered morally correct while disagreeing with one another. However, there are also few downsides to this theory. Relativism may lead to immorality because of opposing perspectives and cultures. Just because one culture views something as good or bad, right or wrong, does not mean this is true. This theory is based off of personal preferences and values, which can lead to conflict and clashing of values. Relativism also does a poor job of establishing an absolute set of ethics, and does not take into consideration that the values and norms of a society can change over time.