Ethical dilemmas Essay

People from all walks of life face many ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas have consequences. Our worldview determines how we deal with these dilemmas, and guides us to the right decisions. In this essay, I will examine an ethical issues through my Christian worldview. I will also present other viewpoints, and compare them to mine.

Ethical dilemmas occur when there is a disagreement about a situation and all parties involved question how they should behave based on their individual ethical morals. (Newman & Pollnitz, 2005). The dilemma that I will be addressing in this essay involves Michael, recently employed male educator working in the nursery, and parents of a baby enrolled at the centre. The parents have raised concerns about male educators changing their child’s nappy as they have cultural practices that do not allow this practice to take place. This situation is classed as an ethical dilemma as there is a dispute between cultural beliefs and legal requirements within the workplace. There are four parties involved (parents, child, educator and director), all

Glaucon begins by arguing that people only act justly because they believe that the action will reap reward. He essentially argues that justice is a necessary evil and without it society would tear itself apart. He argues that justice is a social contract formed because the ‘disadvantages of suffering injury exceed the advantages of inflicting it’(Plato, 2008). Essentially he

1. The Mayor of a large city was given a free membership in an exclusive golf club by people who have received several city contracts. He also accepted gifts from organizations that have not done business with the City but might in the future. The gifts ranged from $200 tickets to professional sports events to designer watches and jewelry.

Nurses are faced with ethical dilemmas every day. There are a lot of different beliefs surrounding ethics and the code of ethics. Ethics and ethical issues have always existed, that is why they have put in place the code of ethics. The American Nursing Association (ANA) Code of Ethics isa guideline to help nurses determine which course of action to pursue. Every minute many ethical decisions are made, some may not comply with guidelines and others the patient’s will never understand. In this case study the nurse is put in an uncomfortable position and has two find a way to comply with the family, the patient, and the doctor’s orders.How can she report to the doctor the information the daughter has told her? How she approached

In Republic II, Glaucon and Socrates pose the question of whether justice is intrinsically good, or instrumentally good. Further, the two men wish to discover which life is best - the just life or the unjust one. While Glaucon argues that the unjust life is best, Socrates argues that the just life is truly better. In this paper, I will summarize both Glaucon’s and Socrates’ arguments, and provide a critical analysis of the opposing views.

Directions: Complete the tasks below. Replace the highlighted text with your own answers. Copy and paste your answers to the student comments box in 1.07 and submit for grading.

Book II of The Republic by Plato showcases the two very different views of Socrates and Glaucon in regards to the account of nature and origin of justice. Socrates and Glaucon discuss the theory presented by Glaucon that states that injustice is something that is intrinsically desired by all humans. Glaucon presents this argument to Socrates in order to understand and defend justice for its own sake. Glaucon seeks reassurance from Socrates that justice is not just only good for the positive consequences that it produces, so he asks Socrates to explain that justice is desirable for its own sake and, additionally, the consequences that it provides. In the defense of justice, Socrates begins to explain that justice is a virtue that needs to be found in the individual as well as the state. Socrates believes that true happiness can only exist with a true set of virtues that are justice and respectable morals. Socrates’ assumption is on the fact that a man committing unjust actions will never be able to have complete satisfaction with his life if he has achieved everything through unjust actions because he cannot fully claim his accomplishments. Through examination of the assumptions of both arguments presented, Glaucon’s opinion on justice is superior to the views of Socrates. Glaucon’s presumptuous claim that humans are innately greedy is able to provide an understanding that justice is only a social contract for the weaker people of society by handicapping the strength of the

“Get back to work Mr. Cheeto,” cried Mr. Twinkie, the perennial Executive Director of Nourishment LLC “and Mrs. Raisin, you’ve been doing great like always.” Mrs. Raisin has been working the same 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. job, five days a week, for the past sixteen years with little to no recognition. Frankly, she has matured since she first joined this firm, now being one of the most senior employees. Not only does she have the dedication, she is a diligent worker as well. Raising three young grapes and being a role model at the same time is extremely stressful and a single raisin.What really irritates Mrs. Raisin is that this Mr. Cheeto, barely out of university for two years, has already ascended to the board committee. Mr. Cheeto has nothing to offer, he sleeps for half his shift and knows next to nothing on the subject. Though, he is well-liked in the firm thanks to his immature personality, it really brings out the joy in the office. In a week’s time, Mr. Twinkie and branches of the firm will be performing an Employee

An ethical dilemma is an incident that causes us to question how we should react based on our beliefs. A decision needs to be made between right and wrong. I have experienced many ethical dilemmas in my lifetime, so I know that there is no such thing as an ethical dilemma that only affects one person. I also know that some ethical dilemmas are easier to resolve than others are. The easy ones are the ones in which we can make decisions on the spot. For example, if a cashier gives me too much change, I can immediately make a decision to either return the money or keep it. Based on Kant’s, categorical imperative there are two criteria for determining moral right and wrong. First, there is universalizability, which states, “the person’s

Furthering his argument against there being an inherent value to acting justly, Glaucon points out that within this described structure, the life of the most unjust person would be preferable to that of the most just person. In order for the most unjust person to survive he would have to be clever enough not to get

Mary Parker Follett suggests that goals of the employer should be compatible with the goals of the employee (Lester & Pernell, 2006). Parker believes that the goals should be integrated rather than coming to a compromise (Lester & Pernell,2006). In regards to the self-interest in Kerrie’s organization, Follett would combat the issue by making sure that all parties involved were able to communicate their expectations. With clear, concise expectations set, Follett would facilitate a meeting to ensure the goals of both parties are aligned. However, Follett feels that there should not be any compromising. Avoiding negotiating will reduce negative backlash from the participants who are on the opposing end of the continuum.

Meanwhile, John is stereotyping by believing Susan is not as committed as others because she had to work part-time to take care of her son. Organizational factors that contribute to this situation include inaccurate performance reviews and a lack of communication. Susan feels as though she had a stellar performance review, however was not recommended for the program with no explanation why. This eludes that John’s review was not honest and that there was a lack of communication in solving the issue. To encourage communication within the department, Kyle could implement regular meetings with direct supervisors that evaluate the status of projects and tasks. In addition, to establish a sense of fairness and respect for differences, Kyle could have John reevaluate his decision for MDP and communicate with his subordinates why they were or were not chosen. This would encourage open communication and make Susan feel that she had a fair chance for MDP. If she is chosen for the program, it could give her a sense of motivation and increase performance. In addition, as one of the few women in the workplace, she could provide a different perspective than the men in the office.

What are the relevant facts of the case? What facts are not known? Can I learn more about the situation? Do I know enough to make a decision?

Lisa was a vital asset to the company. She brought in new business, her accounts were prosperous, and her opinion was coveted on a daily basis by partners that she longed to be equal with.