Ethics And The Ethical Change Essay

“Ethics is about how we meet the challenge of doing the right thing when that will cost more than what we want to pay.” (The Josephson Institute of Ethics) When I think about everything that I have learned within the Business Ethics class, I think of one topic – Understanding Ethics. This teaches you many things like what ethics is, how to understand right and wrong, ethical reasoning and much more. “The field of ethics is the study of how we try to live our lives according to a standard of “right” or “wrong” behavior–in both how we think and behave toward others and how we would like them to think and behave towards us.” (Business Ethics Now, Ghillyer, 4) Some people consider ethics to be a conscious choice to follow a set of moral standards or ethical principles that supply direction on how they should perform in their daily lives; others, however, look to the behavior of others to decide what is an acceptable standard of right and wrong or good and bad behavior. Many factors including how they were raised, their religion, and the transitions and beliefs of their society drive their definition of the right or wrong. Judgments are made about good or bad behavior by moral standards, which are principles based on religious, cultural, or philosophical beliefs. These beliefs can come from many different sources such as family, friends, ethnic background, religion, school, the media–television, radio, newspapers magazines, the Internet, and personal role models and mentors.

The question of what is truly the nature of justice remains an unanswered question as noted by Bertrand Russell in ‘The History of Western Philosophy’ wherein he notes that Socrates was unable to provide a convincing rebuttal of Glaucon’s arguments on justice, and neither have all the social philosophers since, been able to do. Amartya Sen, in his book ‘The Idea of Justice’, has

Do you think people believe that ethical systems are important to the world, or do you believe you have to actually learn about it to understand? The main focus of this paper is to better understand the ethical system. Ethical system is defined as beliefs of being right or wrong; it can be from religious values or even personal experiences. The topics I will focus on is teleological, then talk a little about the differences between deontological and teleological. Secondly, my current ethical system that best fits me. Third, major influence in my life that pushed me into my specific ethical system. Fourth, my current career plans, Firth ethical issues associated with my profession, and lastly, examples of specific ethical dilemmas that professionals in my career path have to face. Based on the ethical system we have discussed in class is ethic of care.

Two theories into ethics and how actions can be justified are known as deontological and utilitarian (also consequential) approaches. These two theories look at situations from different perspectives.

Some individual are concerned that their concepts do not allow for moral dilemmas to have more than stability in mind. It is known to be somewhat concerning, that theories that allow for dilemmas failure to be uniquely action-guiding. “A theory can fail to be uniquely action-guiding in two different ways, by suggesting incompatible actions in a situation or by not suggesting any action at all.” (McConnell2014)

Ad hominem ethical fallacies; which attacks a person’s character rather than a person’s reasoning would be none existent making a change that would empower and persuade for the better.

Morality could be defined as the differentiation between what is right or wrong and what we might consider good or bad behavior. There is not a single definition of morality that could be applicable to all moral questions. Morality could be divided into two distinctive broad examples: descriptive

‘Ethical theories are the rules and principles that determine right and wrong for any given situation’ according to Crane and Matten (2004:76). Its contribution is either relativists which is what is right or wrong relying on the moral norms of our society such as, our culture or absolutists which is deciding what is right or wrong regarding the act, for instance, murder. However, absolutists are divided into Consequentialists (Teleological) which consists of Utilitarianism and ethical egoism and the Non-consequential (Deontological) which consists of divine command theories, Kant’s ethics of duty, virtue ethics, justice approach and the rights approach.

Ethics has been a topic of discussion for many years between scholars, professors, students, companies, and many other living in this century. According to a Santa Clara University business student, ethics could not be defined the same by individuals. Ethics cannot be “pinned down” to a certain definition, meaning that people perceive the word “ethical” in many different ranges. According to the business student, “ethics refers to well-founded standards of right and wrong that prescribe what humans ought to do, usually in terms of rights, obligations, benefits to society, fairness, or specific virtues.” Meaning, ethics comes down to how you perceive right and wrong, based on your values and upbringing.

One of the ethical theories is Consequentialism which supports that a morally right act is one that produces a good outcome/consequence (CITE). In other words, the end must justify the means. Falling under the Consequentialist theory is the idea of Utilitarianism which judges an action based solely on the consequences.

Introduction: Morals are defined as the behavior and belief standards and rules that govern which actions are right and wrong (CITATION). Morality comes from parents, religion, society, and technology. Moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that determines whether something is right or wrong. But someone's moral values may change over time due to certain circumstances that they experience. Ethics are a combination of morality and legality.

1. Consequentialist moral theories see the moral rightness or wrongness of actions as a function of their results. If the consequences are sufficiently good, the action is right; if they are sufficiently bad, the action is wrong. However, nonconsequentialist theories see other factors as also relevant to the determination of right and wrong.

The philosophical division that deals with studying morality is ethics. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines ethics as the “area of study that deals with ideas about what is good and bad behavior.” Two specific schools of ethical thought are consequentialism and utilitarianism. Consequentialism states that rightness of actions depends on the results of that action and utilitarianism states that the right actions are the ones that benefit the well-being of the most people (Vaughn 135). While both schools of thought may seem glorious, they have their share of issues.

The word “ethics” comes from Greek ethikas meaning character. Today, we use ethics to describe the normative standard of behavior. The history of philosophical ethics has been broken up into five rational methods: Virtue, Traditional, Modern, and Post-Modern Ethics. Within these periods, the philosophy of ethics changed along with the changes being made within society.

The objective of this paper is to identify and analyse the policies specified by government and organisations for the protection of consumer interests and the role of ethics in consumer choice. It also analyses the role of ethics in consumer culture and give examples of how the service sector reacts to it.