Ethics Game Dilemma Case Study

People from all walks of life face many ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas have consequences. Our worldview determines how we deal with these dilemmas, and guides us to the right decisions. In this essay, I will examine an ethical issues through my Christian worldview. I will also present other viewpoints, and compare them to mine.

On Thursday, July 9, 2015 I interviewed Shirley Herron at her residence in regards to the complaint she filed against Dr. Justin LaMonda. Mrs. Herron’s complaint alleges Unethical Behavior, Negligence, and Unprofessional Conduct.

Given all circumstances I believe that contacting the proper authorities is the best course of action. With SFC Sharp on his way out of the unit an investigation needs to be started right away before his PCS.

Karen could not identify potential risks, she heard about problems and a task force member told her of problems but she did not do anything about it or try to put measures in place to rectify the problems. After four months she asked in a meeting what the problems were, she could not identify it herself.

2. Take Chip into confidence and request him to participate with Hardy in decision making going forward to ensure faster and effective problem resolutions, if the supervisor is still Hardy.

As noted, on February 29, 2016, the patient was nonetheless admitted to the UCR hospitalist. This was a senior member of the UCR hospitalist team who knew or should have known all of the policies and procedures for admission, and should never have admitted the patient as an attending to the hospital. In so doing, he was directly and deliberately interfering with the doctor patient relationship.

Management in this scenario handled Beverly’s incident appropriately. Beverly expressed denial and tried to manipulate her situation by trying to make management feel sorry for her home life. Management stood their ground with the action plan and did not give into the guilt that Beverly hoped they would.

4. Yes, I think it was unethical for researchers to take her cells and make millions of dollars by using them without her permission. I believe the researchers were lacking both basic ethical and moral principles as physicians.

Dr. Boggio should have considered adhere to the code presented in 3.04 of Avoid Harm before he thought of getting involved as an expert witness against his patient. He should have considered Conflict of Interest (3.06) with his patient. He violated the Specialty Guidelines, sub-category Impartiality and Fairness (1.02), stated that forensic practitioners should be unbiased and impartial in the information they provided as professionals including unfairly bias the results of the

My management report to Benton Williams would include a brief summation of the information gathered by the team, a cost benefit analysis of closing the deal versus being forthright with the information we uncovered. If the land could be cleaned of toxic waste, I would recommend telling Fledgling of the problem and offering to clean it. If it could not be rectified or Fledgling walked away, I would recommend taking the property off the market. The potential damages in the form of costly

D) Relevant ethical codes that can be applied to the articles (please be sure which code of ethics you are citing) and how you would apply such code(s).

Ethical theory will be outlined in relation to the example case with discussion on how the case poses an ethical dilemma in the workplace. Additionally ethical theory will be considered in light of the case with

The issue in particular involved a female employee, Beth, allegedly linked to a criminal organization dedicated to bring and distribute counterfeit products from the Continental United States into and along the western United States. One of the employees within our office, Anthony, was already investigating this organization and I was the senior advisor providing guidance and support to him. Beth was the office clerk. Anthony and I had already identified, through conducting surveillance and by visiting the businesses afterwards for visual confirmation and purchase of evidence, the type of products and brand that the organization was bringing and distributing. It was then, when another employee advised Anthony that they had seen several boxes of the same type and brand of

The second ethical dilemma that our group provided was one that dealt with sexual harassment. Sexual harassment encompasses a wide range of unwelcome sexual conduct. Per Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 this is the first paragraph on the EEOC web page about sexual harassment:

1. Professor Ballistico is the director of the Foodcorp Centre for Food Science at BigCity University. The Foodcorp donated the money to the University in order to set up the research centre and to fund its activities. Professor Ballistico had a recent research which showed the results of the higher risk of the additives. However, the additives in the research were common in the products of the Foodcorp. The main ethical issue is that if Professor Ballistico publishes the results, it is possible that the Foodcorp will go trouble and the funding to the University will be affected. The University relies on the funding. If the results are not published, the responsibility to report the risks of the additives of Professor Ballistico will be