Ethics In Criminal Justice

L. A. Hart, the concept of law need not be understood by reference to any moral standard or purpose. Law, in Hart’s view, can be used for many different purposes, some of them good and some bad. If one had to describe a particular purpose which was a necessary feature of law, it would have to be something highly general and morally neutral such as ‘the provisions of rules for the guidance of conduct’. However, this is not really self explanatory or fully intelligible and requires a further explanation. The natural law tradition of thought would supplement such an explanation of law’s purpose with an account of how rules serve justice or the common good o other values: once one has seen how the provision of rules overcomes certain problems inherent in the human condition, one has understood laws nature. Although, for Hart it is not that the establishment of rules lacks a point, that it may serve huge diversity of different

4.” I believe there was enough ethics taught at the academy. I think the most valuable lessons in this are learned on the job though. If you watch a good honest cop, you can learn more from him than a lecture.” (Shonda Ellis Duncan, personal Interview 2011)

Laws have been a part of civilization for many years. Without them, civilization would implode. Chaos would erupt and people would be a danger to one another. The world would be in anarchy and a brutal place to live. Humanity would cease to exist. According to Wikipedia, law is defined as “a system of rules that are enforced through social situations to govern behavior (www.wikipedia.com).” Laws are put into place to regulate society.

| c. The law does not prohibit all bad behavior. An action that is unethical may

Laws must be observed in order for business, society, and local government to operate proficiently. Laws are put into place to help keep people’s behaviors in order and to regulate standards. Law is a body of rules of action or conduct prescribed by controlling authority and having legal binding force. The common characteristic of the current state of law is that it creates duties, obligations, and rights that reflect accepted views of a given society (Melvin, 2011). The law provides a format to resolve disputes that arise from the duties and rights and allows parties to enforce promises in a court of law. Laws serve many roles and functions in business, society and local government.

Laws are a crucial part of the world. For example, Yugoslavian artist Marina Abramovic stood still and allowed anyone to do anything to her without any consequences. She was sexual harassed and also received a cut on her neck. Law helps prevent these kinds of actions because people are afraid of the consequences. Individuals must have laws so they can be protected and respected. Many employees’ rights aren’t met. A person goes undercover to investigate at Fiera Foods because of many deaths that occur in the factory. He finds that they’re constantly shouted at to pick up their pace. The factory lacks emergency stops and many of their rights are neglected because they are temps. These kind of situations occur with laws imagine without

As society has become more developed and more complex we require more formal principles with the end goal for individuals to live respectively in a precise way. At the point when discussing the law we are discussing rules that we are obliged to take after. In the event that we commit a criminal law we need to pay a fine or go to prison, on

Law is a legal system that comprises of rules and principles set by the government or ruling authority to govern over affairs within the community. Ethics are moral guidelines set, and put fourth and followed by individuals. Las are based on moral values of a particular society. Describing the basic behavior of human beings. Laws represent the minimum standards of any human behaviors, that is, ethical behavior. They both provide people a set of moral values, prevent people from violating them and guidelines of what they can or cannot do in certain situations. They exist for the purpose of making people benefit from being members of a well-regulated society. Laws evolve from our society’s ethics by outlining a basic standard of behavior necessary

I do think it is very important for each professional in the criminal justice field to be aware of the responsibilities that are associated with society. The most important thing is the ethic code. Each career or job has their own specific set of ethics to stand by. When we move up into a higher field like the criminal justice and law we must possess these types of ethics for the simple reason that if we live by protecting and live by helping the law and abiding by the law and what we learn then we will never be wrong. I say this because the law is a set of standards in palace for everyone and everyone must abide by them, however; those rules can be broken at any point in time by anyone. Every criminal justice professional makes extremely serious decisions all the time when they are on the front line or in the office. They make decisions that will impact the rest of our lives and it’s critical that they do what is right and take any biases out of any situation.

Since natural law also affects all members of society, there is a need for norms or laws of natural justice which “considers the relations of

While law and ethics are two separate things, they do overlap some circumstances. The overlap shows that some things that are legal are also ethical but not all law is ethical. The same would apply for the ethics, there are some form of ethics that are not universal and, therefore, not written into law. This diagram represents what most people who consider the “textbook” overlap of laws and ethics, but we see a diagram that shows that within both of these groups, there is a lot of room for personal interpretation. Something that one person might find ethical, another person may consider unethical, and this shows the broad range of those feelings. It could be said that the law is essentially the ethical lowest common denominator. A clear illustration of the legal versus ethical standard is that it is clearly not against the law to cut in line at a coffee shop. However, it is considered unethical to most. Line cutters violate the “unwritten rules” for line formation and order (Business Ethics, pg. 11).

Laws are made to curtail the actions of man, and to prohibit him from various kinds of actions. These are called duties which a person has to do as he is bound by the law to do it. In case of breach of this duty, the law imposes a punishment which a person has to undergo to keep an order in the society. The

By definition, laws are a set of rules that are universally accepted by society as binding (MerriamWebster, 2014). Laws can be referenced and interpreted down to the letter. In contrast, ethics are defined as a “guiding philosophy” or “a set of moral principles” (MerriamWebster, 2014). The first fundamental difference can be interpreted a few ways. Something can be legal and also be unethical. Conversely, an illegal situation can be considered to be within ethical boundaries given the context. A common example of this would be traffic laws. You can drive 66mph on most California freeways and technically break the law. However, this is commonly seen to be within ethical standards of the road. In other words, it’s morally acceptable to break the limit by 1mph. These morally acceptable standards are not legally binding like the speed limit is. They are acceptable rules of behavior while driving a car. This double standard presents a serious flaw in legislating ethics

Laws are rules that individuals and the state must follow if a law is broken sanctions will be brought and an authority will apply the law. Legal systems are in place so that these laws can be effectively made, applied and enforced. Main features which a legal system must have would include a way to make law or legislature where in the United Kingdom parliament creates laws known as statutes. A legal system also must include laws containing the way in which law breakers are investigated and a way to interpret a broken law. Also, laws to cover a wide range of subjects including housing, education, employment and many other aspects within society. H.L.A Hart (2012), cited in OU, (2017. 1.2) viewed legal systems as a ‘union of primary and secondary rules.’ Primary laws as being contract, criminal and employment and secondary laws described as about how the law is managed, how to enforce, apply and interpret the law this theory is that any legal system needs both primary and secondary rules.

It is noteworthy that the legal and political systems are fundamentally different in the first place due to the diverse perspectives of the world, and they have developed into two separate entities with their own purposes and model in the society. Therefore, it is unlikely that they share common philosophy and practices. However, like most other disciplines in the society, sometimes law and politics overlap to achieve a common goal, sometimes they complement each other and at other times, they contradict each other. For example, the differentiation of adversaries has no ground in the law and politics dominates over the rule of law when this occurs. Therefore, the goals, philosophy and practices in both systems do not entirely agree, hence reasoning in both systems must be different also.