Ethics Of Animal Cloning

Biomedical Ethics: Cloning and Sales of Organs To Sell or Not to Sell, that is the Question Table of Contents ITEM PAGE # Introduction 3 I. The Initial Horror 3 II. What is Cloning? 3 III. Bioethics 4 IV. Immanuel Kant 5 V. President’s Council on

Cloning Imagine if you lived in a world where everyone was the same and had no physical differences. Everyone would have the exact same DNA. There would be no diversity within the population. If we continue to clone then this may be a possibility for the future. As of now there have been no cloned humans, but we are not too far away from being able to do so. Scientists have been cloning since as early as 1886, and have been cloning animals since 1996 with the birth of Dolly the sheep. Dolly the sheep was created by using reproductive cloning which is used to produce copies of whole animals (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Furthermore, there are two other types of cloning; therapeutic cloning and gene cloning. Therapeutic cloning is used to produce embryonic stem cells for medical research (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Gene cloning is used to produce copies of genes or segments of DNA (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Cloning should not be allowed because it is inhumane and unethical, results in more failure than it does results, and is unfeasible.

I believe that cloning really isn’t very ethical. I believe that cloning is almost like you are playing God. It is unnatural for a person to be able to clone an animal. I did some research online and found out that 95% of cloning attempts fail. This can give the

Clones are humans. This statement embodies the crux of the controversy regarding the ethics of human cloning. If clones are humans, then they should receive the same rights as humans who were born ‘naturally’. But how do you determine humanity? The film Never Let Me Go (2010), based on Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel of the same name, helps answer the question “Should we clone?” by establishing that humanity is more than the way one enters the world and by highlighting the unethical issues that may arise from cloning.

Cloned meat may not make it to the shops, but it's offsprings might. I thought it was finally over with cloned products, but not quite, as it offsprings rise to the duty to fulfill its place on the shelf. This has been summarized in The New Zealand Herald by AFP

Animal cloning is a big controversy in modern media and in the medical field. Animal cloning benefits many people. Animal cloning is very interesting, you can clone your long lost family pet, you can resurrect extinct animals, and it offers medical breakthroughs. I think it should be practiced more and made more available to the public. Animal cloning has been proved successful on July 5,1996 the first animal was cloned. It was a female sheep named Dolly, so animal coning is an effective practice. There are 2 ways to clone animals, embryo cloning and nuclear transfer. Embryo cloning is where a tidbit of sperm is retracted from an animal and put into a petri dish with an egg from another animal , then fertilization occurs. Once the egg is

What is Wrong with Animal Cloning The world of science fiction came to life in 1997, when the first successful attempt at animal cloning occurred. Dolly the sheep became famous worldwide, and sent the scientific community into a tizzy. However, animal cloning is unethical and wrong, due to the failures, side effects, uses of clones, and the possibility of future human cloning. But to understand this topic more clearly, some basic information must be given. First of all, there are many different techniques that have been utilized in scientist’s efforts, but a great majority of them involve altering the adult cell of a donor to enable it to be reprogrammed. According to Pennisi and Vogel, this consists of taking the cell’s nucleus, then

Reviving extinct animals with cloning is not wrong. Scientists all over the world are working on cloning endangered or extinct animals with some already having success. They have been working with the wooly mammoth. A near perfectly preserved mammoth was found and now scientists are using its DNA to try to clone it back to existence. There are no current

The surrogate mother will ultimately give birth to an identical twin to the donor of the somatic cell (“The Process of Cloning”). This process allows people to clone living things of any sort.

Cloning: Analysis of application to the human reproductive system and biological/ethical issues surrounding its use

Six deaths have to be made before perfection. Cloning dead or alive animals is wrong. Death is not something people should be messing with. Death happens for a reason. When an animal is cloned it won’t come out the same as your old dog. It may

Cloning Morally Right or Wrong Since the 1970’s cloning has been a topic of debate with politicians, churches, scientist and many others. Some important questions need to be asked and understood. What exactly is cloning? Are there different types of cloning? What is the moral or ethical consequences to cloning? Are there any problems or effects associated with cloning? The final question would be, what effects would cloning have on the legal or medical fields? Before anyone can make a stand for or against cloning they should be educated on the processes and outcomes. With answering these questions and material covered my Gregory Pence, my stand on cloning is clear.

There are also many negative aspects of cloning. To create different organs or limbs in order to help a person to live longer or more comfortably seems to go against nature. The way human life should be created is through sexual intercourse. Harmond Varmus, a schoolteacher, said it best; “Human cloning represents a grave attack on the dignity of conception and on the right an unrepeatable, unpredetermined set of genes.” To clone an animal is almost the same thing. We are playing with the way humans and animals have reproduced for years. Is it fair that we clone and then kill an animal just for its organs in order to save a person’s life? Scientists are not even sure that the animal’s organs will be compatible with the human body. According to the Medical Research

Because the cloning process is not perfected and in most cases leads to disabilities and deformities in the animal clones, cloning is physically harmful to the clone. Consider the Non-Identity Problem in this case: not existing at all is better than existing with a shortened lifespan and with disabilities. Essentially, bringing something into existence that only suffers is worse than not bringing it into existence at all. Living with a predisposition to fatal diseases such as cancer, a weaker immune system, or an almost guaranteed shorter lifespan sounds much more miserable than not living a life at

Imagine having a herd of cattle, hogs, sheep or goats and every single animal in the herd is the exact same, not only looks but their genes too. Well, in the future that may be the case in a lot of larger farm production lots through animal cloning. While there are many people against animal cloning, there is actually no harm done to the animals involved in the clone. (FDA US food and drug administration) Cloning in agriculture should be allowed because it would improve the farmers herds.