Ethics Of Cloning

Cloning can have positive and negative impacts, but there is no way of knowing how it will turn out since it has not been studied enough. Cloning has been performed on various species of animals, and so far there have been far more deaths than successful clonings. It may seem like a good idea to many but people need to understand that it does not only take one time to clone an individual. There are trial and error to make every clone. Cloning could be ethical to our society but as seen in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the outcome could drastically be different from expected, and the result can backfire in many ways.

Imagine if you lived in a world where everyone was the same and had no physical differences. Everyone would have the exact same DNA. There would be no diversity within the population. If we continue to clone then this may be a possibility for the future. As of now there have been no cloned humans, but we are not too far away from being able to do so. Scientists have been cloning since as early as 1886, and have been cloning animals since 1996 with the birth of Dolly the sheep. Dolly the sheep was created by using reproductive cloning which is used to produce copies of whole animals (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Furthermore, there are two other types of cloning; therapeutic cloning and gene cloning. Therapeutic cloning is used to produce embryonic stem cells for medical research (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Gene cloning is used to produce copies of genes or segments of DNA (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Cloning should not be allowed because it is inhumane and unethical, results in more failure than it does results, and is unfeasible.

As the world keeps aging, science will keep growing with the use of technology. Scientists have tried the process of cloning for many, many years and while time has passed, scientists have been increasingly getting better at cloning and thus attempting more complicated cloning. In the 2005 novel, Never Let Me Go, human clones are created to be organ donors for humans that need an organ transplant in order to survive. Clones look like humans, have feelings like humans but are not necessarily looked at as “human beings” in the novel. Throughout the novel Never Let Me Go, Kazuo Ishiguro’s expresses his belief that science has no limits and poses the questions ethically, where do humans draw the line.

Cloning is very unethical. It would be violating the human rights in many ways. It would be violating of the freedom of beliefs and thoughts (Peter Flaherty, and D. Lynn Moore. Civics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2000) Cloning also reduces human dignity. Humans can be sold as manufactured products. If we allow

There is plainly a huge measure of moral and good stresses as for human cloning. Human life is acknowledged to be important and blessed. Cloning certainly is now and again successful the principal gone through, which infers that human creating leaves will fail miserably. Most would concur that cloning is like murder or manslaughter in any occasion. For the people who don't assume that life is holy, it is basically tissue being disposed of. Cloning is hostile. The most vital piece of a man is their soul, soul or psyche and cloning does not enable one to accomplish this, it rather enables one to endeavor to accomplish some hereditary standard. There is no hobby for cloning, it is inhumane to the point that there are people on this planet with to a great degree cruel desires and human cloning would take into account military utilize. For instance, a country that could clone people could make a massive outfitted power that could attempt to expect control distinctive countries and provoke boundless wars of emotionless men. Individuals should be made through an exhibition of love and not a show of science. One that is cloned can never again be seen as a man, as your identity isn't generally essentially yours; you are giving it to someone else. Another case for instance, if mental oppressor seats had the ability to clone then the world would be an extensively all the more startling spot reliably in fear of being ambushed at any dark time. This, and in addition human cloning could

Example: A women lost her daughter in a flood. That woman decided to take her daughters skin cells and uses it for reproductive cloning in order to have her “daughter” back. This is morally wrong. There is no point for her to do this because the person, clone, will have a different personality from the daughter. This will be a disadvantage to the person,

Diversity diminishes, and the human population decreases. It shifts the process of natural evolution. For hundreds of generations, our ancestors developed through a gradual process of changes from their ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. By hindering this process our specie will suffer. The negative outcomes are far greater than the positives. Maybe cloning can and will allow for possible answers for diseases and cures, however it still interferes with the natural order of life; the human life-cycle. We must put into consideration the time and money spent on the experiment with the cloned lamb. After years of several failed attempts prior to creating Dolly, can we, as humans, walk with a clean conscious knowing the amount of safety and harm caused toward a developing child-clone and those involved in the process (DNA holder, scientists, etc.)? This paints a clear picture of how cloning a human will be far more difficult, dangerous, and unethical. As a mother, I strongly oppose of this idea due to the consequences of how we, as a society will view these cloners, and how these cloners will affect my children’s lives. Will my children lead a normal life if they are deemed having a weak and undesirable DNA? Undoubtedly, a loss of individuality and diversity is created. Our genetic make-up is what makes us unique. It gives an individual a sense of self and distinctiveness. Eventually, the population starts to lack uniqueness. Two people wouldn’t be sitting down having a conversation on their diverse backgrounds, rather everyone else will have almost the same thoughts and ideas. How can a society grow and learn about all the

While some believe cloning to be acceptable others feel equally strongly that human cloning is completely wrong. With the state of the science as it is at the moment it would involve hundreds of damaged pregnancies to achieve one single live cloned baby. What is more, all the evidence suggests that clones are unhealthy and often have a number of built-in genetic defects, which lead to premature ageing and death. It would be completely wrong to bring a child into the world knowing that it was extremely likely to be affected by problems like these. The dignity of human life and the genetic uniqueness we all have would be attacked if cloning became commonplace. People might be

cloning like any other medical experiment (johansen, 2001) . Second, cloning eliminates the need of reproduction, because from 1 individual you can have 100 copy that looks the same. No one will be unique anymore. Cloning is creating a body that does not contain a soul, it is creating just a zombie (Is human cloning wrong?, 2016). Third, psychology and physical harms to the person cloned will be present. This harm comes from the fact that the parents will treat the child as they have a second chance of him (Bhargava, 2010).

Are you one of the millions of humans that take their individuality for granted? If so, adding a replica of a loved one no big deal. Or is it? Human cloning, will it be the wave of the future which will create a human being that will genetically superior or simple replace a loved one that died? What would a parent pay to replace a lost child $1000.00, $10,000.00, or as much as one million dollars, and if so would this be justifiable, moral, or even ethical? Cloning another human being through artificial means draws speculation, fear, and debate. These concerns would suggest that it borders unethical boundaries, is currently not safe enough for human reproduction. The causes,

The first problem that human cloning encounter is it is one of unethical processes because it involves the alteration of the human genetic and human may be harmed, either during experimentation or by expectations after birth. “Cloning, like all science, must be used responsibly. Cloning human is not desirable. But cloning sheep has its uses.”, as quoted by Mary Seller, a member of the Church of England’s Board of Social Responsibility (Amy Logston, 1999). Meaning behind this word are showing us that cloning have both advantages and disadvantages. The concept of cloning is hurting many human sentiments and human believes. “Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality in the cloning of other mammals, we believe that cloning-to-produce-children would be extremely unsafe, and that attempts to produce a cloned child would be highly unethical”, as quoted by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Since human cloning deals with human life, it said to be unethical if people are willing to killed embryo or infant to produce a cloned human and advancing on it. The probability of this process is successful is also small because the technology that being used in this process is still new and risky.

If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right

Scientist are constantly making advancements in the world of stem cell research and cloning. Some argue though that cloning is unethical because it is considered “playing God”. We as humans should not interfere with what the big man upstairs has planned for us in life. Such interference could be detrimental to his “plan”. When it comes to a person making the decision to be cloned, their decision would fall under the deontology school of thought. With cloning being so risky it would probably be made under circumstances that it is their responsibility to do whatever it takes for their family and friends, despite what is best for them. We often sacrifice what we want for the ones we love. Such examples of this dilemma would be medical issues.

Many people have asked, "Why would anyone want to clone a human being?" There are at least two good reasons: to allow families to conceive twins of exceptional individuals, and to allow childless couples to reproduce. In a free society we must also ask, "Are the negative consequences sufficiently compelling that we must prohibit consenting adults from doing this?" We will see that in general they are not. Where specific abuses are anticipated, these can be avoided by targeted laws and regulations, which I will suggest below.

     Some people say limit cloning of humans to just research or for medical reasons, but it’s the same thing. Producing clones for research or to use their parts is unethical. Cloning for just medical research is still harming another human being to save another. That is wrong in my mind, ethically and morally. Its ethically wrong because I fell that a humans morals aren’t to kill other human for body parts. It’s morally wrong because it’s not the right conduct of a human to do such a thing. Even if cloning is limited to medical research, there is still the risk of cloning humans. We simply cannot play God and create life because it is ethically wrong and sinful, and most importantly, dangerous. It would be against the code of ethics of a doctor to harm a clone. Harming a clone would be such using one of its organs to save the original life. The question shakes us all to our very souls. For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that makes them all human. The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically wrong. The clone would be a human being and deserve