Ethics Of Organ Donation Essay

In the article “Kidneys for Sale: A Reconsideration,” the author, Miriam Schulman raises the notoriously controversial issue regarding organ sale. He describes the main ideas from both the supporting and the opposing side to give readers a wider view about organ sales.

There is no denying that organ transplants save many lives. Nevertheless a issue exists because the demand for organs surpasses the legally accessible supply. The selling and purchasing of human organs is illegal all around the world. As a consequence a black market has been created to help satisfy the need of human organs. The black market consists of the rich, the poor and the broker. The rich uses the broker to help organize the purchase of organs from the poor and arrange the transplant operation. Many argue that the simple answer to this is to establish a legitimate firmly monitored organization for selling and purchasing human organs and others argue against that proposed answer. In this essay I will list and compare augments in

It was only a matter of time before a businessman in Virginia saw a way to profit from the success of transplantation. In 1983 H. Barry Jacobs announced the opening of a new exchange through which competent adults could buy and sell organs. His failing was in his decision to use needy immigrants as the source of the organs (Pence 36). As a result Congress, passed the National Organ Transplant Act (Public Law 98-507) in 1984, which prohibited the sale of human organs and violators would be subjected to fines and imprisonment (“Donation Details”).

The serpent from Lord of the Flies and the snake from “The Book of Genesis” are similar and different in their own ways because they both are a threat and bring doubt and uncertainty, but one represents freedom and the other represents fear. “‘He was dreaming.’ Laughing, Ralph looked for confirmation round the ring of faces. The older boys agreed ; but here and there among the little ones was the doubt that required more than rational assurance,” ( Lord of the Flies, page 36). This proves that the serpent is a threat because when the little boy said there was a serpent Ralph was trying to convince everyone there wasn’t one, even though he wasn’t sure himself; he tried to convince them that the serpent wasn’t real because he didn’t want to

Many suggest that offering incentives or some form of monetary reimbursement for organs is likely to increase the quantity of organ donors and make the entire process easier for both donors and recipients. The severe organ shortage has generated such desperation that people all over the world have begun to resort to unethical practices to obtain the priceless organs.

The medical industry had been achieving more in the stage of medical advancements, though they are still in the early phase. Artificial organs have been one of those achievements. Although they have achieved such, artificial organs are not perfect. Most doctors as well as patients would prefer to replace a dying organ with a compatible human organ, rather than with an artificial or animal organ. Yet due to a there being less organs donated than recipients, artificial and animal organs are becoming more common in transplants. Most of this issue is because people are unaware of how organ donation works, the organs that can be donated, how many people are in need, and the advancements that have happened in the field. Organ donation saves hundreds of lives every year, but many lives are recklessly lost due to a shortage of organ donors.

There is a well-established industry for the buying and selling of organs to those who are in dire need of a transplant, both legally and illegally, in many different countries. The legalization of the sale of organs in the United States would have serious consequences and raises many ethical dilemmas- regardless of religious beliefs. There are several ideas presented in this paper that present the issues that have hindered the progression of the legalization of organs. Currently, there is an organ waiting list of 123,897 patients on the organ recipient list ,the number of transplant that have actually occurred in January - August 2014 are 19,426 (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network). There is no denying that there is a significant gap between the number of transplant surgeries performed and those awaiting a donor. The ever growing need for these lifesaving organs is clear, but to allow human beings to sell parts of their body is not the solution to this complex problem.

Finding a way to increase supply of organs would reduce wait times and deaths. Some people use black market in some other places to pay for live donors or for organs from cadavers to reduce their waiting time. Supply of organs depend on the price above the cost of the surgery, and because of that supply curve has backward L-shape. Incentive can be any material gain or valuable consideration for donors, people who give organs. They can take number of forms and one of them is financial. The idea of financial incentives is considered as solution for organs shortage on the market. Financial incentive for organs donation can be accomplished by following approaches: direct payment of a sum of money to donors, reimbursement of expenses, form of “donor

In February 2003, 17-year-old Jesica Santillan received a heart-lung transplant at Duke University Hospital that went badly awry because, by mistake, doctors used donor organs from a patient with a different blood type. The botched operation and subsequent unsuccessful retransplant opened a discussion in the media, in internet chat rooms, and in ethicists' circles regarding how we, in the United States, allocate the scarce commodity of organs for transplant. How do we go about allocating a future for people who will die without a transplant? How do we go about denying it? When so many are waiting for their shot at a life worth living, is it fair to grant multiple organs or multiple

Entailing that exploitation does not entail for a completely open and unregulated market for human organs. Although allowing the market to freely determine the price of human organs in the market economy, there are reasons in favor of regulation in which would enable authorities to monitor developments and react accordingly when the time is needed. Not only will authorities monitor developments, but excess regulation will be taken into precaution to prevent the indecent price escalation that would put organ donors in the hands of affluent buyers, and protect donors from corrupt middlemen whose primary interest is profit making. Legitimate sources would also be ensured for the organs and guidelines that would offset inequalities and injustice (Medical

In the United States, there are currently 116,608 people in need of a lifesaving organ transplant, and 75,684 people that are currently active waiting list candidates (HRSA, 2017). Between January and September 2017, there have only been 12,211 organ donors (HRSA, 2017) which is far less that the current demand for lifesaving organs. The shortage of donors could lead to an individual looking for outside sources such as the black market to find their lifesaving organ. Offering incentives to persons who chose to donate their organs or those of a deceased loved one is important because it could stop the illegal selling of organs, save the life of someone in need of an organ transplant and benefit both the donor and recipient.

the sale of organs such as the dilution of altruism in society, the risk that

In the United States, there are over one hundred thousand people on the waiting list to receive a life-saving organ donation, yet only one out of four will ever receive that precious gift (Statistics & Facts, n.d.). The demand for organ donation has consistently exceeded supply, and the gap between the number of recipients on the waiting list and the number of donors has increased by 110% in the last ten years (O'Reilly, 2009). As a result, some propose radical new ideas to meet these demands, including the selling of human organs. Financial compensation for organs, which is illegal in the United States, is considered repugnant to many. The solution to this ethical dilemma isn’t found in a wallet; there are other alternatives available

In this paper I will be using the normative theory of utilitarianism as the best defensible approach to increase organ donations. Utilitarianism is a theory that seeks to increase the greatest good for the greatest amount of people (Pense2007, 61). The utilitarian theory is the best approach because it maximizes adult organ donations (which are the greater good) so that the number of lives saved would increase along with the quality of life, and also saves money and time.

Every year thousands of people die, while waiting for an organ transplant. The average wait for a person to obtain an organ is four and a half years (Becker). Not many people have this kind of time which results in the numerous deaths. A way to resolve this problem is to compensate organ donors. Donors should be reimbursed for their donations because it allows patients to be given their organs faster, will help end organ shortages, and the donors should receive compensation for their hospital stay, along with other expenses that the donor typically has to pay out of their pocket. This controversial topic of compensation for organ donors has been concerning more and more people, because some individuals think that it's ethically and morally