Using valid peer-reviewed sources on the Internet, update any dated facts in this case with more current information. How do these new facts reflect the current ethical culture of the Red Cross? According to the case study, the American Red Cross had seven different acting or permanent heads in the first decade of the 21st century. This "run-through" of CEOs at the America Red Cross ended when Gail McGovern joined the American Red Cross in April of 2008, and she has been in office since, making complimentary changes and moving the company in the right direction. In March 2011. " she was appointed as one of 10 members on the President’s Management Advisory Board and serves as the only nonprofit leader on this White House …show more content…
Homes were mildewed from the storm, as well people were left cold without heat and there just was not enough descent housing; however, the money that was raised for the victims was being set aside and I feel that this was a problem that the red cross encountered while handling money. b. What are some of the reasons for the ARC's ethical dilemmas, and how can the organization guarantee that these problems will not recur in the future? Many of the reasons for the American Red Cross' ethical dilemmas was because of their untruthful presidents and CEOs as well as some of their employees' greed. Many of the ARC's staff were greedy and were only concerned about padding their own pockets and not about the welfare of others and this is one of the biggest reasons for the ARC's ethical dilemmas. Also, the organization had to many people that were not looking out for the welfare of the company as a whole. Another reason for the dilemmas of the ARC is because they did not have to account for their actions and did not have to report to someone who would hold each and every one of them accountable (www.citizen.org). The company should have all of their members held to the highest standard possible in ethics and values when they are hired and randomly throughout one's employment. Not just anyone can work for an organization like American Red Cross, but it has to be someone that holds themselves at high standards, both
The organizational structure of the American Red Cross needs to be taught that ethical compliance is its first priority; otherwise issues will continue to present themselves when the ARC is needed most. Mandatory, in-person, ethical classes should be held every year for employees and volunteers to help reinforce the ARC’s claim that they are fixing their internal issues. Also, executive leadership needs to be held accountable for their actions and not given monetary compensation upon their
Which of the following is not a provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act?
They also now offer a 24-hour, confidential, anonymous hotline where reports of concern can be made (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Farrell, 2015). According to the ARC website (n.d.), the Office of Corporate Ombudsman also is responsible for making reports to Congress outlining all reports to this hotline. While this is an adequate start to ensuring that the company continues to operate ethically it is not fool proof. This Corporate Ombudsman reports directly to the President and CEO, and make regular trend reports to the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Governors (American Red Cross, n.d.). If the President and/or CEO was unethical, they may demand that something be removed from a report to cover up a scandal or episode of unethical behavior. If this Ombudsman was not associated with the management of the organization this may prevent some issues from being swept under the proverbial
3. What are some of the reasons for the ARC’s ethical dilemmas and how can the organization guarantee that these problems will not occur in the future?
The American Red Cross’s organizational structure and compensation has a tremendous effect regarding the ethical behavior among the chief executives when addressing the frequency in turnovers of top executives that helped to weaken the organizations ability to carry out its federal mandate. The American Red Cross’ reputation also began to take a downward fall as the rewarding of large bonuses and severance packages were given to top executives when they left the organization. There were leadership issues among the local chapters that lead to management misconduct and it dampened the fundraising efforts. When a well-known nonprofit agency such as the American Red Cross cares more about paying out executives than saving lives it creates a low
Based on my interpretation of the article, it appears that the leadership within areas of the Red Cross is trying to guilt the leadership
Probability → Considers how likely each effect might be, given that we don’t know ahead of time which of the many possible effects will actually occur.
This paper seeks to examine group and individual therapy models to determine which model is most successful based on empirical evidence and case studies that will be reviewed and discussed within this paper. All age ranges will be looked at when making the determination as to which model is superior and results in more successful and long-term solutions for the needs of the individual going through therapy. Further, this paper seeks to establish and understand the parameters of ethics as it relates to group therapy. A conclusion will be drawn based on the evidence reviewed. This research paper addresses the hot topic of ethics in groups. Based on the topic, it highlights
The new facts reflect the current ethical culture of the Red Cross by the fact that the leaders of this organization create problems within the organization. With as many leaders as the organization has had, the ethical standards will change
The American Red Cross is a not for profit organization which primarily focuses on the public service, social welfare, disaster relief etc. While considering the chief executive position of this non-profit organization the organizational structure and the compensation plays a vital role in their ethical behavior.
In this case we have read about the American Red Cross and the ethical issues it has endured. One big issue that the American Red Cross has seen is fraud and lying. It seems that several employees and volunteers have taken advantage of the lack of organization within the company. There have been volunteers that have taken pre-paid debit card, money orders, and supplies while they were supposed to be helping those in need. There have also been employees (including managers) that have embezzled money for the company that was intended for victims of disasters. Some could even say that the ARC has done its share of lying when it comes to where the money for donations is spent. Another issue that ARC has dealt with a conflict of interest. At one
Since the writing of this case, the American Red Cross (ARC) is on record as having conceptually addressed its infrastructure and operational hurdles. However, very few strides have been made to reverse stakeholder perception crisis response time, relief dispatch strategies, and the ethical dilemmas plaguing the organization. Governmental mandates that streamlined the board and that established accounting /reporting parameters have done little to modify the organizations operational culture.
As mentioned before the Red Cross is known as nonprofit company who demanded the highest quality of ethical performance from their employees down to the volunteers who help and assist them. The Red Cross operates under an ethical code of business which helps them maintain a high standard of conduct that is expected by the American people who allows them to continue their services. Red Cross has an Ombudsman as an impartial way of resolving disputes who provides informal assistance to individuals who may have complaints on the company. The constituents or internal stakeholders consist of volunteer’s employees of the company, donors and suppliers. Information is voluntary and confidential, the informal processes are to be fair and offer different alternates to resolve issues. Formal resolution of
Is it immoral for a person to write lies on his/her resume? This question poses many questions in it's self. How fictitious is the lie, what are you lying about, what could be the consequences of this lie and whom and how will this lie affect the people involved? How would John Stuart Mill answer this question?
the committee receives the consultation, the team sets up a meeting. Dr Fernandez says a consultation can be submitted by a staff member, patient or doctor. The issue at hand decides which team gets certain cases. Each sub-team has three (3) members who meet at each meeting. Once the team receives the consultation an interview is set up to interview the patient if the patient is able to be interviewed. A meeting is set up to interview the health care team and a review of the patient’s medical record is done. After all the information is obtained from the physicians and the records have been reviewed a decision is made.