Ethics of Euthanasia Essay

Active euthanasia should be permitted as a medical treatment to allow people the right to die with dignity without pain and in peace. Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, takes on many different forms. When most Americans think of euthanasia, they think of a specific form that is referred to as “active euthanasia” which means to actively do something that will end a patient’s life with or without that individual’s consent. When euthanasia is performed in an involuntary manner it is usually because the patient is comatose, unconscious, or otherwise unable to communicate whether or not they want to have their life prolonged through artificial means. In such cases, the physician makes an

Assisted suicide is an ethical topic that has sparked up many controversies. Individuals have heated disputes on whether or not patients who are suffering should have the right to die. Some worry that legalizing euthanasia is irrational and would violate some religions, while others argue that it provides a peaceful death towards terminally ill patients who are suffering from pain. Physician-assisted suicide is a contentious matter, in which there are many positive and negative aspects, whether or not it should be committed is a complex decision.

The Romans' had a philosophy about dying that essentially meant that if you live, then you deserved to die. This philosophy has been incorporated into the “right to die”. There have been laws and court rulings that support this ideal of having the right to die. This right entitles the patient to refuse any further medical treatment that would just stymie an inevitable death. This allows the patient to experience a natural death. The supporting viewpoint on the matter of physician assisted suicide argues that the right to die, a right supported by laws and courts, also allows a patient to request a death assisted by their physician. They argue that the two, euthanasia and the right to die, are very similar. Meaning, assisted suicide should be supported as much as having a right to die.

Physician-assisted suicide is the voluntary termination of one's own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. While some are against the idea of physician-assisted, many believe that if someone is terminally or completely incapacitated, physician-assisted suicide should be an option. Others oppose the idea of it due to religious reasons or don’t want to give up hope that their loved one could make a recovery. For doctors, it is a tough decision because of the morals and ethics they may have. Suicide itself is a touchy subject, but there are several things it is good to know about physician-assisted suicide. Many people argue that one of

Voluntary Euthanasia has been considered a controversial topic for many decades. The idea of committing an act that involves the taking of human life is not one that many people would care to discuss openly. The main argument is that a person who has been diagnosed with an incurable illness and is in extreme pain and their ability to move has been limited, while that person still has control over their destiney should they be allowed take their own life (Bowie, R.2001). The worldwide debate weather one should be allowed to end a life is still one of the biggest ethical issues. The attempt to providing the rights of the individual is in conflict with the moral values of society. Voluntary Euthanasia has been highly rejected by many religious and pro-life institutions.

Many people have different opinions on the debate of legalizing Euthanasia or Physician- assisted suicide. “The term assisted suicide has several different interpretations. Perhaps the most widely used and accepted is "the intentional hastening of death by a terminally ill patient with assistance from a doctor, relative, or another person". Some people will insist that something along the lines of "in order relieve intractable (persistent, unstoppable) suffering" needs to be added to the meaning, “(2) The major debate on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are: the slippery slope to legalized murder, the right to die, and the Hippocratic oath and prohibition of killing. “Proponents of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) contend that terminally ill people should have the right to end their suffering with a quick, dignified, and compassionate death. They argue that the right to die is protected by the same constitutional safeguards that guarantee such rights as marriage, procreation, and the refusal or termination of life-saving medical treatment.” (1) I

Many people in the world are suffering from illness that cannot be cured. They live their last days in pain and suffering wondering when and why it happened to them. Instead of suffering, many people dream of suicide to take their pain away but they know no one would understand. In very few states, it is legal for people to get assistance to put them out of their pain and suffering. It is called assisted suicide. Assisted suicide is the help from a physician to end their patients’ lives with their permission. The patient must have a terminal illness with less than six months to live to qualify. Many people are against assisted suicide because they believe that it is just a cover for murder. People should be thought of as dying with dignity

Euthanasia is a controversial topic regarding whether or not physician-assisted suicide should be further legalized. Euthanasia is the act of a medical doctor injecting a poison into a patient 's body in order to kill them. Some argue that euthanasia should be legalized to put people out of pain and misery. However, others argue that some people with terminal illnesses would do anything to live longer and believe that it is a selfish and cowardly act. Euthanasia is disputable because of the various ethical issues, including, but not limited to: murder and suicide illegality, the Hippocratic Oath, and medical alternatives. As someone who has had many traumatic experiences and who wants to become a doctor, I am very passionate about the well-being of my future patients and the responsibility to do no harm to them. For these lawful, logical, and personal reasons, euthanasia should not be legalized.

I would like to begin by defining the issue of the article by Patrick Nowell-Smith. The issue of his article is legalizing euthanasia and giving people a right to decide when and how to die.

This chapter discusses the literature currently available on the ethical dilemmas of euthanasia and PAS that have arisen in Canada since its legalization. This Literature Review is organized into six sub-categories: (1) the law (2) medical issues (3) patient capacity and autonomy (4) expenditures: palliative care vs. assisted suicide (5) family (6) ethics. This review will offer a foundational understanding of the practices of euthanasia and PAS and defining the various dilemmas that have arisen for medical professionals under the new Canadian law. The literature gives the acronym for euthanasia/ physician assisted suicide as PAS or EAS, and these terms can be used interchangeably.

be fed orally because of blistering in the mouth and throat. Any movement of the

From friends to family members, we all want our loved ones to live prosperous, healthy lives, but when a terminal illness rises and nothing can be done to fix it, should we disregard that loved one’s wish to be put to rest? Assisted suicide has been an ethical dilemma for centuries, trying the teachings and morals of people across the world. Of course, the thought of any form of killing becoming legal would raise red flags for most, but “suicide is no longer a crime anywhere in the English-speaking world” (Humphry). Nevertheless, when a patient suffers from an incurable disease and is too weak to take their own life, they are forced to continue living. Therefore, it should be legal for people with terminal illnesses who are too weak to commit suicide and are old enough to have legal control over their actions to have the choice of assisted suicide, as they have control over their lives and therefore should also have control over their deaths.

The knowledge that an illness is causing the patient’s body to slowly give up can be too much to mentally handle for some. Terminal illnesses are permanent, meaning that the patient will not recover at any point in their life. If they are not going to recover, why make them wait out death? Why not let them take the control from the illness and decide what will happen to themselves? Suicide assisted by a doctor could help end a patient's suffering and allow them to feel a sense of control within their life again.

in our place to say who has the right to live or die, but it is in

Throughout many years, there are many cases that people have used euthanasia, or physician assisted suicide. They used it with the purpose of releasing their soul and the pain that they could not endure any longer. Euthanasia is a process provided by the medical system today that involves active and passive euthanasia. Physician assisted suicide is spreading across the world, and people are using it legally. In the U.S, euthanasia has been legalized in some states so people are trying to take advantage of it. Many people have used euthanasia so they would not suffer any longer. Indeed, while some people will argue that coercion holds a strong presence in the process, euthanasia should be legal to give people the right to choose whether