Ethos Pathos And Logos For Rhetorical Analysis

As global warming becomes an even greater problem and efficient sources of energy are hard to find, nuclear energy has increased in popularity. For example, “Global climate change and depleting stores of fossil fuels have brought the need for new energy sources to the international stage. US president Barack Obama publicly supported the creation of new nuclear power plants in the United States as an alternative to fossil fuels” (“Nuclear Energy”). Also, as the years go by, nuclear energy is becoming a source that unites many nations around the world. For example, last year the global community came together in Paris, France, where leaders and representatives from almost every nation discussed the problem of global warming and what the world can do to slow this increasingly dangerous issue. The main goal was to knock down the net of carbon emissions released into the atmosphere to zero. Although many thought that this would be impossible, after much discussion they realized that it would not be too difficult by using nuclear energy. This plan has proven to be effective by both France’s and Sweden’s dramatic drop in carbon emissions by using nuclear energy (Newsela Staff). Therefore, with global warming increasing, and there being a lack of alternative energy sources to which to turn, nuclear power is becoming increasingly popular globally due to its many benefits

One of the most pressing topics of debate in the recent years has been the different sources of energy and their effects on the environment. People have started to realize the negative effects of non-renewable energy, such as greenhouse gas emissions and other negative effects on the environment, but neglect to take action and implement more ecofriendly energy sources. For the past 300 years the world has been predominantly powered by coal and other non-renewable energy sources, but now it is time to move past these energy sources and transition to more efficient, clean energy like nuclear energy. In those past three centuries, we have learned a lot about how fossil fuels effect the environment, while also discovering clean energy sources that can replace the outdated energy sources. In this essay, I will argue that nuclear energy is the solution to the energy debate and prove that it is the best energy source based on its effect on the environment, economy and energy efficiency.

Despite the fear of nuclear disasters and proliferation of nuclear weapons, the 435 nuclear power reactors around the world produce approximately 16 percent of the world’s electricity and 19 percent of electricity in the United States (WIT, 2013). In a world increasingly affected by global warming, with increasing energy consumption, it is important to acknowledge that nuclear power is a safe, clean, reliable, and sustainable source of energy, unlike our presumptions. This paper analyzes potential risks and benefits of nuclear power as a fuel source and why the United States should continue nuclear power production.

At the start of the mid 1950’s, the world was introduced to a new, alternative source of power that would revolutionize the energy industry; this power became known as nuclear energy. Since that time, nuclear energy seemed to pave the way in efficiency and supply power to countless cities around the globe. However, the past has shown that there are many major disadvantages to using nuclear energy. Today, many individuals believe that nuclear power plants are hurtful to the Earth and urge America and various other countries to use “green energy” instead and help preserve Mother Nature. Numerous individuals and groups from around the world are currently creating new ways

Undoubtedly, there are many concerns over global warming, which is largely con-tributed to the burning of fossils fuels. In this respect nuclear power is one of the cleanest means of generating power. Unlike many other forms of electricity nuclear power does not generate electricity by burning products. In fact nuclear power does not generate any carbon dioxide, sulfur oxides, or nitrogen oxides (U.S. Energy Information Administration, n.d.), which are green house gasses that contribute to global warming. Additionally, “Nuclear power provides an environmental benefit by almost entirely

Right now in America, there are 65 nuclear power plants with 104 operating nuclear reactors that generated a total of 769 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh), or 19% of the nation's electricity (EIA source 1). But a push to further nuclear as a primary source for energy is uncertain, ideas of safety for the surrounding regions’ people and environment are a main concern. In recent light, the nuclear program support has begun to slowly grow back since its halt in 1980. However, much of the population is still against the idea of nuclear energy. Issues regarding radioactivity waste management, future nuclear accidents, and other pollutions such as thermal pollution of waterways and extra background radiation hinder the argument for nuclear

As the threat of climate change increases, the discussion of nuclear energy has arisen again. One of the most important problems the world is facing today is limited supply of energy resources. It is common knowledge now that oil, coal and gas will come to end extremely soon; therefore it is vital we find a replacement for fossil fuels before they are depleted. NASA’s Jim Hansen, perhaps the world’s foremost climatologist, warns that the situation is so dire that, “The entire world needs to be out of the business of burning coal by 2030 and the western world much sooner.” But to fully understand what it is we are committing the world to we must first understand what energy, mainly nuclear energy is and what its positives and negatives are. Will it have a positive or negative impact on our society? Nuclear energy: Friend or Foe? Is it the way to go?

Climate change is beginning to become more and more of a serious problem in today’s modern age. It’s because we use too many fossil fuels like gas, coal, and oil. These fossil fuels are polluting our Earth faster than we will be able to fix it. Nuclear energy will be able to fix that problem. With cutting out oils, gases, and coal, it would produce fewer greenhouse gasses and make the world a significantly cleaner place. The World Nuclear Association, said that: “Increased awareness of the dangers and effects of global warming and climate change has led decision makers, media and the public to realize that the use of fossil fuels must be reduced and replaced by low-emission sources of energy, such as nuclear power, the only readily available large-scale alternative to fossil fuels for production of continuous, reliable supply of electricity.” The uses of nuclear energy will have very few, if any at all, effects on the Earth’s climate and will help

It is clear that the world is in desperate need of new sources of electricity. Right now, more than 70 percent of the world’s power comes from coal, natural gases, and oil. All of these sources are not only unrenewable, but they are polluting our environment. When they are used, they release greenhouse gases into the Earth’s atmosphere and quickly start to make the global temperature rise. We can already see the impacts of climate change: icecaps are melting, ocean levels are rising, animals are going extinct, the air is becoming unsafe to breathe, and the world is getting hotter every year. These impacts are only going to get worse and more prominent if we don’t find a solution. Considering that the U.S. is the second largest contributor to greenhouse gases, we need to act quickly. Luckily, we have the technology to start using cleaner energy and therefore repairing the damage that we have done to our environment. The solution is nuclear energy. The United States needs to use more nuclear power because it creates less waste both in our land and air, it uses less space than other energy sources, and it is much safer than other energy sources.

When the words nuclear energy comes out of an individual’s mouth there are always people associating it with harm. Most of time people think of the nuclear bombs, nuclear waste or other horrible incidents. There is no doubt that these are the wrong ways of using and looking at nuclear energy. However, there are many positives about nuclear energy. Unfortunately, the nuclear energy that could be talked about today is being ignored and shut down. The thought of terrible incidents are clouding the vision for a potential brighter and better future. The present day people, filled with too much sensitivity, are obstructing those who try to better their countries with the addition of more nuclear reactors. Although nuclear waste can be hazardous, in fact, nuclear energy has a very positive impact on the economy and the environment.

In a time where the whole world is “going green” there is a push to develop a new clean source of energy that does not pollute the atmosphere. Solar, and Wind energy are experiencing a large amounts of growth, making leaps and bounds in every part of their development; however what citizens, and lawmakers have failed to notice is the best possible “green” energy source has been around for a long time. Nuclear energy is the best possible solution to the world energy crisis, providing enormous amounts of energy without polluting the atmosphere, or taking up open land to be used for agriculture or other development.

In the United States, nuclear energy produces about 19.7 percent of the total energy produced. Nuclear energy is the backbone of energy production, but it comes with setbacks. It’s elderly technology, in general, and the after-product of nuclear fuel is radioactive waste. There are numerous other cheaper and other effective alternatives to little/no carbon emission power sources, like natural gas. Nuclear energy, along with toxic waste, decreasing supplies of uranium and risks along running a nuclear power plant, is not a safe and effective energy source.

Currently, in the 21st century, we face a multitude of problems regarding the safety and well being of our environment and ecosystem as a whole. For hundreds of years, people have been creating energy, unaware of the irreversible damage and the harmful effects it can have such as climate change and the greenhouse effect. Because of this, people have begun to stray away from the burning of fossil fuels and now rely deeply on renewable energy sources such as sunlight and wind. But with all these more modern ways of manufacturing energy becoming increasingly much more popular, nuclear energy has controversially become an option for many areas in the United States and also the world. This form of energy production has various different advantages such as its proficiency against fossil fuels and low pollution. Despite this, nuclear energy, in fact, is more harmful to the globe as it has many safety concerns and creates issues of where to dispose of nuclear waste.

In recent times, the issue of sustainable energy has resurfaced frequently in politics. The current popular energy sources used today include gasoline, coal, and other fossil fuels. These fossil fuels pollute the environment and contribute to various harmful effects. This energy source has sustained not only America, but also the entire world population for well over a century and has proven to have a very high energy output. Despite this output, the supply of fossil fuels is finite and becoming a rapidly depleted source. This is where various alternate energy sources begin to come into question. Nuclear energy tends to have a negative connotation amongst many general populations, however it could be the answer to this economic,

Due in large part to its high energy output, nuclear power is a feasible and practical technology for meeting the world’s energy needs. For example, global energy demand has been continually increasing, with a 66% growth between 1980 and 2007; this demand is expected to increase by 40% by 2030 (World-Nuclear.org). As a testament to nuclear power’s utility as an energy source, it currently provides a large amount of global electricity: nuclear power met 20% of the global demand of electricity as of 2008 (Abu-Khader). This power generation is spread across 30 countries and is a result of 436 nuclear power plants (Adamantiades). The 20% figure also represents the United States’ dependence on nuclear power for generating