Eu Economic Law, Freedom of Establishment

• Indirect discrimination: when you have a rule or policy that applies to everyone but disadvantages a person with a protected characteristic.

What is discrimination you ask well it is the treatment or consideration of, or making

In conclusion, both disparity and discrimination are assumed to be the same. Many people confuse the both because they have similar meaning. The only difference between the two

Bent, J.R., (2011). The telltale sign of discrimination: probabilities, information asymmetries, and the systematic disparate treatment theory, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 2011, Volume 44, Issue 4, p. 797

3. The difference between discrimination and disparity, it is that discrimination is the unjust or prejudicial tretament of different categories

indirect discrimination is being prejudice or even mock a person or an group of people, this is harder to prove because this type

13. There are two types of discrimination recognised by the law. These are indirect and direct. Give an example of each.

Disparity and discrimination are closely related but there is one major difference between them that sets them far apart. Disparity is

Surprisingly, it was the first time I heard these two terms and after understanding what they mean it was easier for me to distinguish illegal discrimination. Additionally, now it’s easier for me to understand and explain when and why a situation is utilizing illegal discrimination. However, knowing these definitions will help me in the future by recognizing right away if I am being illegally discriminated. The second thing that I learned is the case, Griggs v. Duke Power. The case is about a black man who was not able to be promoted to a supervisory position, because the organization required a high school diploma, intelligence test, and aptitude test. At the time, most black men didn’t have a high school diploma. In my opinion, the case is significant because it highlights many important things about HR selection. For example, the case recognizes the concept of adverse impact, it concluded that tests administer to job candidates must demonstrate validity, and that intent of employer is irrelevant. Therefore, every time I remember this case I am able to understand adverse impact, that every test for a specific job must be valid, and that intent of employer is

Discrimination began as something that defined social organizations and groups. Many discriminatory aspects such as race, gender and ethnicity increasingly became a problem within capital sentencing as the years passed. Racial discrimination for example happened during the 1850s. One trial in specific, the Dred Scott v. Sanford case demonstrated racial inequality by denying all blacks any human rights. This case “symboliz[ed] the high point in American law, but it also helped lead to the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, which has been the fountainhead of racial equality in the 20th century”(Finkelman 1). Along with race, gender is also used to create discrimination. Women for instance, are constantly discriminated against. As stated

Discrimination on the basis of class, gender, sexuality and ethnicity operates at the level of attitude, on the street, in the home, at the workplace or at social venues. In regards to the Criminal Justice System, race and gender are always accounted for in court proceedings. As

Are there differences between discriminating on the basis of race or ethnicity and discriminating on the basis of gender, sexual orientation, or disability? What might be some legitimate reasons for treating people differently?

There are many reasons that our business in Mexico is exposed to agency problems. With our company being an MNC, it would be hard for our managers and top executives to keep track of what is going on in Mexico at our language school. Another agency problem is that our company could face is that our employees might not follow the standards and uniformity by which we in the US abide. These two agency problems could in turn have a negative impact on shareholder wealth.

Direct discrimination occurs when a person with a disability is treated less favourably than a person who does not have a disability.

Aside from the obvious, unfair treatment does not always equal unlawful discrimination. Treating a person differently from others violates Equal