Eu and Nafta

The European Union (EU) is a unique economic and political partnership between 28 different countries. It consists of about half a billion citizens, and its combined economy represents about 20 percent of the world’s total economy (Briney, 2015). Today The European Union works as a single market, with free movement of people, goods and services from one country to another. There is a standard system of laws to be followed, and since 1999 many countries share a single currency called the Euro (Europa.eu, 2015). This essay will explore the background history of the European Union and the benefits and drawbacks of the European Union.

NAFTA is the treaty that created the free-trading zone among the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

NAFTA eliminates tariffs completely over several years and removes many nontariff barriers like quotas. Many tariffs ended the day NAFTA took effect: They affected half of all U.S. exports to Mexico, such as

In 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was enacted between two industrial countries and a yet still developing nation. This was an agreement that was the first of its kind due to the relationship that the countries had and the investment opportunities that it presented. The United States, Canada, and developing Mexico decided to work towards eliminating most tariffs and non-tariff barriers between the three in order to increase the flow of trade in goods and services. Since its enactment NAFTA has led to the providing of over 40 million more jobs throughout the countries, and it has also tripled merchandise trade between the three participants to an astounding $946 billion USD in 2008 (NAFTA Now). However even then it is still not very clear whether enacting NAFTA was worth the time and effort and in fact the United States may have been better off not having joined NAFTA.

The North American Free Trade Agreement, commonly known as the NAFTA, is a trade agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico launched to enable North America to become more competitive in the global marketplace (Amadeo, 2011). The NAFTA is regarded as “one of the most successful trade agreements in history” for its impact on increases in agricultural trade and investment among the three contracting nations (North American Free Trade Agreement, 2011). Supporters and opponents of the NAFTA have argued the effects of the agreement on participating nations since its inception; yet, close examination proves that NAFTA has had a relatively positive impact on the economies of the United States, Canada, and Mexico.

A partnership between Mexico, Canada, and the United States, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) created the largest free trade area in the world ("North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA),” n.d.). Signed in 1992 by George H.W. Bush, the treaty was preceded by the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement signed in 1989 (Tuesday, 2008). The document received bipartisan support in both the House and Senate with Republicans providing the majority of votes in each (Kessler, 2016).

The North American Free Trade Agreement, also known as NAFTA, is an economic treaty between Mexico, Canada, and the United States that went into effect on 1 January 1994. What this treaty consists of is eliminating trade tariffs on imported and exported goods, between these three states; making this the world’s largest free trade agreement. NAFTA also eliminated trade barriers opening borders between these states.

Essentially the way NAFTA works can be broken down into six points. Firstly, NAFTA grants the most-favored nation status to all co-signers. The countries are required to treat all parties involved in a trade agreement with equal handling. They cannot give one party special treatment, for example, giving a better deal to a domestic investor versus a foreign one. And it goes the same with giving better deals to non-NAFTA investors as well. Second, NAFTA took away tariffs on imports and exports between the United States, Canada, and Mexico. NAFTA created rules to help regulate the trade of clothing, farm produce, and cars. This helped to reduce the prices of foreign goods being traded within the three countries. Third, regulations were put in place to ensure all products being traded must originate in the United States, Canada, or Mexico. The exporters were required to get a Certificate of Origin to waive the tariffs.

In agriculture NAFTA’s goal was to establish different cross-border engagements in regard to the agriculture trade. As one engagement would be established between the U.S. and Mexico, the other would be set up between Canada and Mexico. NAFTA in regard to the trade in agriculture involving the U.S. and Mexico did away with the majority of the barriers not having nothing to do with tariffs. This was accomplished by converting them to ordinary tariffs, or by tariff-rate quotas. Tariffs placed on corn and sugar where done away with in 15 years between the two nations (Villarreal & Fergusson, 2014). One-half of the agricultural trade between the U.S., and Mexico was duty free when NAFTA was established. This was an advantage to both nations due to the fact that before NAFTA exports from the U.S to Mexico in agriculture were under the control of requirements in licensing imports that were restrictive (Villarreal & Fergusson, 2014). Next in regard to the automotive industry, NAFTA did away with the auto decree in Mexico that was so restrictive. This involved the doing away of tariffs from Mexico on products from Canada and the U.S., and importation tariffs from the U.S. on Mexico as long as they followed the stipulations involving the rules of origin. These were sixty percent in regard to parts for other

In 1950 The European Union was formed, it started by the cooperation between six countries it were Germany, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy, and the Netherlands it grew until in 2013 they become 28 members Croatia was the last member at the EU. Latin American is the group of countries in America where Romance language are spoken. Latin America contains twenty states and several countries and dependencies which cover an area from the southern border of the United States. As a fact from the history trade between Latin America and Europe started in 1492, it is a long history of successful relation between the two regions. The EU and Latin America have several common factors such as history & culture similarities that would make them understand the necessities each other can easily.

The main interest of this work is to analyse this trade alliance from three different points of view to outline the similarities and differences in contrast to the European Union. To figure out about the initially mentioned question it is planned to start with the economic point of view in the first part. The second part will deal with the political aspects whilst

barriers were eliminated within ten years of the Act. A national treatment for member countries was adopted to liberalize trade services and investments. Performance requirements were removed, and dispute mechanism for investment conflicts were created. Protectionist issues emerged regarding progress in eliminating anti-dumping policies and persistent administered protection frameworks.5NAFTA did not substantially liberalize trade amongst all three counties in the agreement and fell short of its high expectations but it has certainly been a beneficial liberalizing force overall for Canadians. The North American Free Trade Agreement has been beneficial for Canada due its strengthening of relations with the United States, and increasing economic growth in our nation.

The current international system is characterized by growth in globalization hence regional integration is becoming a common phenomenon in most parts of the world. As a result of states becoming more interconnected, most of them have opted for regional integration so as to enhance trade between states thus boosting economies of the states as well as the regions as a whole. Besides free trade, regional integration has seen to it the elimination of trade barriers, free movement of goods and people across borders, regional co-operation in issues to do with peace and security within the regions among various other benefits of regional integration. One of the regions that has grown as a result of regional integration is the European Union (EU), which is an economic and political partnership composed of 28 European countries. This paper will focus on the EU and give a theoretical analysis of the Brexit while giving lessons of integration and liberalization based on the Brexit.

People have created unions many times but not all of them were successful, specifically when we consider alliances among number of countries with different economics, political systems and culture. For instance, last century brought both the biggest collapse and the most promising union in the modern history. Although U.S.S.R has disappeared from geographical maps, some of its members joined another alliance. The European Union (EU) is an economic and political partnership that united 28 countries on the European part of Eurasia and represents a unique form of cooperation among members today.

The European Commission is the Executive (governmental) body of the EU, initiating legislative proposals and also managing the EU’s budget (Europa, 2007). Each commission operates for a five-year period, with meetings taking place in Brussels every Wednesday. The Commission consists of a President of the Commission and twenty-eight commissioners (some vice presidents). Employees of the Commission are organised according to department (Directorates-General) and answer to a Commissioner. The Commission exists in order to represent the interests of the whole of the EU (thus arguably the whole of Europe), as opposed to individual Member States. The Commission represents the EU on a global basis and is the main participant in negotiations in areas such as trade. The appointment of Commissioners is the responsibility of the Parliament, with all having previously assumed senior positions in politics in their own country, usually within its national government. Proposals are drafted by the senior civil servant (Director-General. A proposal may be adopted if more than half of the Commissioners decide to adopt it. Once agreed, all Commissioners must give their unconditional support – similar to the collective responsibility held by the Scottish executives and the UK. The Commission works closely with both