Despite Luxembourg being the smallest member of the European Union, it is very vocal about its concerns regarding the Syrian refugee crisis since Schengen infringes of their sovereignty. However, Luxembourg is also the wealthiest and may be able to help provide for the Syrians. Luxembourg is very critical of the EU’s action regarding the Syrian refugee crisis. Luxembourg has offered to take in 400 refugees in the coming years (Turner). This is a small number compared to the amounts the other Member States have taken on; however, Luxembourg is the smallest Member State and it is a large amount for this small nation. The EU is requiring the Member States to help with the crisis, even though most are not happy with doing so. The cost of …show more content…
The presidency prioritized the EU with other nations of the world to carry out initiatives to implement an effective immigration policy (Programme and Priorities). Additionally, the Paris terrorist attacks of November 2015 made migration policy even more of a priority for Luxembourg. Even today in 2016, the migration crisis is becoming a great problem for the EU and its Member States. Ignoring the issues will not solve the problem and Luxembourg clearly recognized that migration within the EU is something that they must resolve. To manage with the influx of migrants, the Council and the Parliament agreed to designate more than 2 million euros for humanitarian aid and emergency assistance(Report of Achievement). The EU gave this money to Member States who are having the hardest time with dealing the migrants. This would help smaller countries, like Luxembourg, to manage the refugee crisis. Also, the Luxembourg presidency implemented the European Agenda on Migration to focus on the issue of migration within and outside the European Union (Report of the Achievement). This crisis is not just a European issue and by talking with other countries, like Turkey, a better system can be created to help the refugees and the people affected by the refugees. The refugee crisis is still an ongoing problem and the Luxembourg presidency was the first to take action on the situation. In
Saul’s article recognizes that the Syrian refugee crisis exists amidst citizen sponsorship, Aboriginal judgement, and disorder within EU countries’ immigrant policies. According to Saul, democracy in Canadian politics grants citizenship to immigrants without any obstacles. Canada’s immigration policies are transparent because they are balanced with civic participation. Saul thinks that multiculturalism is a forceful catalyst towards establishing equality and integrity for the refugees. In the first point, Saul does not agree that refugees should be privately sponsored and assisted by the government. In the second point, Saul indicates that Canada’s national identity is the product of the encounter between the Aboriginals and European settlers, which has resulted in citizenship. By entering the Inuit circle, immigrants can establish themselves as a strong unit not by having roots outside Canada, but by living with Canadian intellect. The immigrants should mold to nature because this is the way the Aboriginals have defined their understandings of life. As Sifton has noted, “the … government … made presentations … to potential immigrants, presenting beautiful images of the Rocky Mountains and thriving settled farmland” (475). In the last point, Saul comments on the European prejudices that are
In the final draft I will expand on each of the issues, by looking into more specific examples of both what different European countries are doing policy wise, as well as what the sentiment is among the refugees in the different areas of Europe. To fully be able to understand the conditions the refugees are facing I will be using other scholars ethnography work; One of those works being Katerina Rozakou’s piece regarding the management of refugees in Greece. As a result of that knowledge I will be able to come to an accurate conclusion as to what course of action should be taken in Europe as a whole, to deal with this ongoing
Freely accepting the migrants would be a much better solution. Moreover, distribution of refugees calculated according to host country population or gross domestic product was a gross simplification and unworkable. Also, possibilities of integration of the migrants in particular countries should be taken into consideration. Equally important is the dialogue of all the 28 EU member countries concerning common solutions for asylum policy. Additionally, the
The refugee crisis is a hotly debated and controversial topic all over the globe relevant to today. The rising number of refugees arriving in the European Union has significantly increased throughout the past few years. The controversy comes from not the refugees themselves, but from where they are emigrating from. Coming from extremely hostile and dangerous countries operated by the Islamic State militants, there is a sense of hysteria from the opposing side saying that there are risks that need to be factored in when accepting such a large amount of people from places where there are high concentrations of terrorism into their home countries. On the other side of the argument, the advocates for refugees are proclaiming that as humans we have moral obligations to give the quintessential helping hand to humans whenever one is in need, regardless of their situation or circumstances. Through social activism these proponents are seeking to
The difficult conclusion must be that neither burden-sharing nor diplomacy will end this crisis, that migrants will continue to come in very substantial numbers, and Europe will continue to blunder along, torn between concern about their suffering and fears about a future different from the one we had until now imagined. overcrowded refugee centers and local authorities and police stretched to their
According to MigrationPolicy.org (2004) the number of asylum applications grew from 10s of thousands in the millions within 20 years. To respond to today’s current refugee crisis, Germany has begun resettling refugees within its border, and in record numbers. Germany is the leading country with refugee resettlement in the world. Germany offers many laws, policies, and programs to address the crisis. Germany offers various assistance for refugees depending on their
In this Article, the authors discuss how the right to political asylum has been established and reestablished throughout history and its role in society now. They discuss how refugee law ties with the right to political asylum as more Syrians are trying to enter the Europe and gain asylum. The authors bring up the issue of the political divide in trying to handle the refugee crisis. They bring up the different issues that are causing controversy in being able to make a consistent policy to be able to have control over the migrant crisis. The authors also discuss the efforts that have been made to try to have control over the crisis.
Women, men, and children from West Africa are migrating to Europe because of the instability and violence that is taking place in Syria, Iraq, and Eritrea. According to the International Organization for Migration (IOM), “About 710,000 people” are crossing the european border. The vast migration is causing an increase on human trafficking, since traffickers and smugglers are taking advantage of the refugees. The IOM is reaching out to European countries “to spend more resources against sex trafficking,” in order to relocate and reduce the amount of refugees that are being victimize. A plan to resettle 10,000 Syrian refugees in the United States has being criticize because people are concern about the national security of the nation. The GOP presidential candidates are against the resettlement program. According to them the Syrian refugees post a threat to the national security of the United States. While, the Democratic presidential candidates want to increase the number of refugees that are going to be admitted. The refugees crisis has become the worst humanitarian Crisis in the world today. As citizens we have to sympathize with them and provide a
The authors of this article are never clearly identified on the webpage. French Prime Minister Manuel Valls believes that “tighter control of Europe’s external borders would determine the fate of the European Union”. This in is stark contrast to German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s almost celebratory welcoming of the refugees into Germany back in September. Despite this initial enthusiasm towards the refugees, Merkel has received an increasing amount of criticism at their continuous flow into the country. In hope of preventing any conflicts, ensuring tighter border control, and making accessible any aid that the refugees might need, French Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron and Sigmar Gabriel, Germany’s Economy Minister, have both proposed that a fund be established in the amount of ten billion euro. Regardless of the increased tension and Prime Minister Vells statements on the matter, the United Nations “condemned new restrictions on refugees that have left around 1,000 migrants” stuck at a main border near
This issue was chosen due to its scope. The Syrian refugee crisis is among a list of issues that will not only shape the world in 2016 but also dominate news outlets in upcoming years. Because of the despairing situation, many governments are struggling to find ways to handle the rush of individuals seeking asylum, for the fact that it seems the crisis is worsening. In addition, the media coverage on the topic sparked my interest and led me to research information because I had no idea what was occurring and the detriment of the issue.
Refugees facing placement difficulties these days, because most of the countries are not prepare to accept refugees. The leader of eight EU member states and non member May be they are strict and saying that the directing refugees are not be acceptable
There were 156,000 refugees in Europe by June. The EU continues the search for health care, Emergency support and stable places to go so the refugees have a stable, long term environment to call home for these refugees to go.
Since 2011, Syria has been engaged in a Civil War with protestors against the government and members of the extremist group ISIS, and approximately 7.6 million people have been displaced from their homes (usnews.com 2015). As the conflict destroys more homes and livelihoods each year, an increasing number of civilians have been forced to leave Syria and try to find safety elsewhere. Already a contentious issue, the Syrian refugee crisis has awakened tensions, both economic and social as debate erupts over what to do with the refugees.In response to the crisis, while some countries like Germany have pledged to help the refugees, (New Statesman 2015 1) only 2,340 have been admitted. Clearly, more needs to be done in order to help the refugees. Although there are economic and population concerns to be considered, the humanitarian conflict that faces the refugees and solutions already available are reason enough for Europe to increase the numbers of Syrian refugees allowed in.
Robert Fico, the Prime minister of Slovakia, claimed that “Enforced solidarity is an oxymoron”(Swidlicki). Although the European Union has made plans to have member nations take in Syrian refugees, some nations of the Eastern Bloc, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, have rejected this plan, thinking that it would lead to chaos in Europe. However, across most of Central and Northern Europe, especially in Germany, it is a very different story. Münster University professor Dietrich Thraenhardt said that conservatives in Germany “do not play the race card like in France or Britain”(Bershidsky). Although other domestic problems might overshadow the Syrian Refugee issue, “The greatest
Luxembourg is a small country located in between France, Germany, and Belgium. This small country also is one of the founding countries of the European Union. Despite not being vocal as some of the more significant countries, Luxembourg still impacts the European Union. The Council of the European Union, the co-legislative body, has each of the twenty-eight member states rotating as the president of the European Union. The president is not a person, but rather one of the member states. Every 6 months a new member state sets the agenda and leads the Council. Member states try to push agendas in favor of their country. Luxembourg has last held the presidency from July to December 2015. During this presidency, Luxembourg pushed focus on the single market’s digital dimension and the migrant crisis facing the European Union. These major concerns do not only concern the European Union but also Luxembourg. A major concern of the European Union not too long ago was the Euro crisis. Luxembourg was thankfully not as impacted by the Euro crisis, but it did impact the EU in its entirety. The European Union and member states like Luxembourg experience a dynamic relationship; the choices and events impacting the EU also impact that member state and the interests of member states like Luxembourg impact the European Union. Despite its stature in the EU, Luxembourg has a principal role as any other country in the European Union.