Euripides As A Good Character Analysis

The start of theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century b.c, with Sophocles being considered the master of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, classic fables that the people of the era knew well were used to tell the stories. The tragic hero’s of these stories often strive to live honorable and righteous lives, but because of some mistake their lives would often great and noble death. The idea that serving the state was proper way to gain honor was a popular belief during this time period. This philosophy was echoed by Plato in his book, the Republic. Plato dealt with establishing the ideal state. The way to achieve the ideal state was through striving for justice. Justice, according to Plato, is doing only the tasks assigned to them by nature. This is the fundamental notion for his creation of an ideal city. It is both knowing what true justice is and where one belongs in the city that the ideal can be achieved. Justice in a city can be found in an individual as well outside the individual because it is a concept that is universal. If a ruler of a state was to maintain order and control over his people

Euripides’s plays often featured uncanny insight into the human condition and the struggle that his characters bore due to their expected roles within society.

The establishment of the courts provides a place for the citizens to decide about what is moral and to debate the details of specific cases. The emergence of the jury trial also suggests that justice is not “just” unless it involves deliberation. In the earlier plays Orestes and Clytemnestra took justice into their own hands by acting impulsively and Aeschylus implies in his tragedy that When a person seeks justice they must be careful not to pursue it in a vindictive way because revenge will inevitably transgress into suffering for the person seeking reprisal. the law needs to be concerned with definitions justice itself. In other words, justice without judgment is too rash and impulsive. A jury is necessary so that questions can be deliberated. Was Orestes matricide justified? Circumstances, motives and consequences must be taken into account at trial.These are complicated moral

“The good life” can have various interpretations to different people. Sophocles’ Antigone and Socrates in the Apology represent similar principles that guide the way in which the characters live their life. In Sophocles’ play, Antigone goes against the wishes of her uncle, Creon, to do what she believes is morally right and just. Similarly, in the Apology, Socrates defends himself against the accusations of Meletus, who claims that Socrates does not acknowledge the gods of the city and corrupts others by teaching philosophy (Apology, 28). Both Antigone and Socrates believed that “the good life” was rooted in following the wishes of the gods and doing what was right in accordance with the divine. Additionally, Socrates held the idea that

Aristotle’s tragic hero is one of the most recognizable types of heroes among literature. A tragic hero combines five major points all of which have to do with the hero’s stature in society, his faults, how these faults effect him, the punishment his faults gets him, and how he reacts to this punishment. Aristotle explained that the story of Oedipus the King, written by Sophocles, is a perfect example of a tragic hero. In the play, Oedipus is given a prophecy in which he is told that he will kill his father then marry his mother. As in many Greek plays, Oedipus tries to run from his prophecy and ends up fulfilling exactly what it is foretold. Through the play we see that Oedipus posses many of the characteristics

Socrates believes that he is an individual who had the potential to accomplish extraordinary feats due to his unique set of traits. He claims, “If they were of any use, Crito, the many would be able to do the greatest evils, and so they would also be able to do the greatest goods, and that would be fine. But as it is they can do neither, since they cannot make a man either wise or foolish” (Crito, 44d). Only certain people have the capacity to complete enormous feats, and those people are not average citizens of the state. Instead, they must have qualities that set them apart from the rest of the population. Furthermore, “it is reputed at least that Socrates is distinguished from the many human beings in some way” (The Apology, 34e).

Oedipus is admired by his subjects for being a wise and compassionate king, yet his authority does not have honorable foundations. His power originates from unintentionally killing his own father, the former King, thus establishing his authority in brutality and lawlessness. He puts all of his efforts into capturing the man who killed his father, despite the fact that his violence caused his death in the first place. The Greeks were similar to Oedipus in this way, as they did not “have an idea of absolute law.*” They understood the complexities of determining what is honorable, and constructed an approach which took into account the possible inconsistencies of law. Their society had a flexible view of what determined lawfulness, as it was not naturally “fixed, shifting and changing into its opposite.*” Essentially, they believed that being honorable is relative.

Within The Eumenides by Aeschylus, one of the main themes is Justice. Justice is a virtue perfecting the will, which enables one to give others their due. Justice involves punishing actions that are wrong and defending what is right. According to the play, justice is essential for order in society, for everyone must be given their due. Without justice, there would be a lack of order and peace.

Aristophanes’ play, The Clouds, has an inconsistent message about morality. Morality is the difference between what is right and what is wrong. Morality affects our action, thoughts, and what is perceived as good and bad. For the ancient Greeks nomos was the concept of law and moral conduct, while physis was natural behavior. In both plays there were incidents that have a moral argument. In The Cloud, there are scenes where morality is question about what a character is doing. Compared to Euripides’ play, Electra, morality is a key issue. Some people may say that in The Clouds, the moral argument is view differently than in Electra. In this paper I will argue that the concept of what is moral is different yet the same for the characters in both plays and some characters are more vulnerable to having their sense of morality swayed.

There are many issues with Euripides’ quote. Firstly, the term ‘proper judgment’ is extremely abstract. For instance, Machiavelli and Kant would have very different ideas on what ‘proper judgment’ may be, but both are thought to be notable political philosophers. The decisions rulers make will always be criticized by one group of people, so it is difficult to say for certain if someone meets

Democracy, emerging in the city-state of Athens, allowed unprecedented power to her citizens. Among these new powers was the ability to legislate. Yet, legislation was not without its problems. First the citizens must agree upon what is just and unjust, and then enforce the law by bringing the unjust to reconcile their guilt with the public through trial, and finally dispense the appropriate penalty. This evolution was not without concern. The Greeks were attempting to establish a governmental system which would span the middle ground between anarchy and despotism. By the crimes played out in Aeschylus' tragic trilogy The Oresteia, Aeschylus demonstrates the contrast between anarchy and

As illustrated in the play Oedipus Rex by Sophocles, ancient Athenians were concerned over social, political, and the moral well-being of their land. The people looked to their ruler to help them in solving the issues that plagued their land, such as spoiled crops and the lack of fertility. The citizens were worried since their land had been “Stricken in the budding harvest of her soil, Stricken in her pastured hers, and barren travail Of women; and He, the God with spear of fire, Leaps on the city, a cruel pestilence… The blackness of the Grave made opulent” (2). Based on the words from the priest, it is evident that the people looked to their ruler in hopes of finding relief from the terrible plague; the citizens hoped that their king would guide them and show them a way out of the terrible situation that they were in. They begged the king to “...find some way to succour [them]” and to “... build the city in stability” (2-3). The citizens expected their almighty ruler to step up and defend them from any harm, as well as to bring prosperity to their glorious land. They saw their superiors in a god-like way, expecting them to solve any issue that arose within the land. The actions of the ancient Athenians show that they were faithful in the power of their rulers. The citizens of Athens saw their ruler Oedipus as their “... life’s establisher… the mightiest head” (2). The Athenians viewed Oedipus as their savior when he solved the Sphinx's riddle, freeing them from her claws.

There are many facets of personality of a minor character that authors may utilize to supply contrast to the main character of their work. Some of these contrasts are extremely noticeable and some are not. One such facet is with the use of a neutral character; to not only showcase the main character’s flaws, but so not to detract from the moral of the story. Creon, from the play “Oedipus the King” by Sophocles is used for both of these reasons. Sophocles wished to show that one cannot escape fate, yet did not want to cloud this issue with a possible coupe against his main character Oedipus. He also showed how, at times one character can act completely irrational, while one remains calm in the face of serious accusations.

To begin with, an honorable person is someone who can be trusted and are highly respected by everyone. Honorable do the right thing even if it’s the hardest thing to do. Artemidorus is one of the most forgotten characters in the play, but plays a significant role. Artemidorus is the most honorable man in the play. Artemidorus writes a letter to Julius Caesar telling him about the conspiracy and names all the conspirators. By doing this he is risking his life to protect the life of Julius Caesar, because he is a devoted friend. Artemidorus then proceeds to go out and wait for Caesar to pass by to give him the letter on his way to the Senate to be pronounced King. This shows that no matter what the cost is, Artemidorus stands up for what he believes in and has the best intentions in mind. Artemidorus writes in this letter that despite the whole conspiracy going on, the gods are on Caesar’s side. By telling him this in the letter it shows that even when times are bad, he always has something

Oedipus the King is a Greek tragedy play written by Sophocles, and it made its first debut