It was a Golden Era in Europe because they had a lot of developments. They had developments in farming, there made more efficient water and windmills, which contributed to the jump of food supply. Since they made more efficient supplies for growing crops, the food supply increased. Not only did the food supply increase the population increased by 25million people to more than 70 million people. Some other developments they had were in school. There were a lot of universities found throughout Europe, they introduced a new system of learning. Eventually, all of these schools replaced the monastery and church schools.
No, the “Dark Ages” were not dark if you were to look at the sources. The first reason why it wasn’t is that they had a lot of
In the 500's-1,500's, Europe had advanced and their population grew along with their education. For example, Document C discusses Europe's economy. Europe's economy has advanced, and they got their land back that was taken from them, and their population grew from 25 million to 70 million! This document states, "Food supply increased significantly, bringing up the population." Another example would be E being about Europe's education. The education has advanced and became more important than only going to monastery's and church schools in the 11th century. According to this document, "Universities introduced a new system of education, eventually replacing the monastery and church schools." These are some of the best events that occurred in Europe during the
Based on all of those factors that compose a dark age, it is right to say that Europe was in a dark age. In 1347 AD, there was an outbreak of a disease called the Bubonic Plague killing 50 million, or 60% of Europe’s population. According to document B,"There the plague sat like a lion on a throne
In my opinion “The Dark Ages” is not an appropriate term to describe the Middle Ages. One reason why I don’t think it is an accurate term is because it is misleading and may make you think that it was just some long-time period where nothing important even took place. Well, that is wrong and many things actually did happen during the time period.
The term Dark Ages relatively defines as when a civilization faces starvation, war, disease, internal struggles, less innovative people, and unvalued education. This term was coined by a famous Petrarch-Italian scholar named Thomas Aquinas,when he compared the dark age to the classical period which was in a Golden age. The term Golden age occurs when a civilization has new inventions, efficiency, education, high literacy, a big population, good health, impressive architecture, peace, surplus of food, and enforced laws. The time period of Medieval Europe was 500 AD-1500 AD with the events of the black death epidemic, the crusades, harsh government, and a small amount of people going to school to get an education. The lapsed events clearly
There is many examples of evidence to support how Europe wasn’t in a dark age. To support this claim there are some examples. The Government ,The Rise of University, and the Gothic Cathedrals shows that Europe was not in a dark age. One reason Europe was not in a dark age was because if it was in a dark age they wouldn't know to stand up for themselves. They also had a lot of money, even though King John took it all proving that they were not in a dark age.They were also beginning to request laws so they can have some rights. According to the Black Death Documents,"To all free men of our kingdom we have also granted, for us and to our heirs for ever, all the liberties written out below, to have and to keep for them and their heirs.”Another
The most significant political innovation of the early 19th century was the abolition of property qualifications for voting and office holding.
The middle ages are a topic that most people know of as the ‘Dark Ages’ but mainly because no one could identify what really happened during this time period. This was a period of learning and innovation. Great things like religion, democracies were spread and created. That is why the ‘Dark Ages’ weren’t so “dark,” like every person makes them out to be!
During the Middle ages it experienced many things that would be considered dark, faithful, and Feudal. The Middle ages were dark because they were attacked by several disasters; including the Bubonic plague, robberies connected to pirates and “booty”. The Middle ages were faithful because during these dark times there was no government, so everyone had to go and connect with their local church and the churches had to be the government figure for everyone. The churches eventually got lots of the church to go fight for the Crusades, which lasted for a hundred years. The Middle ages would have been called Feudal because the Feudal system was their social order and that's how they operated in life. If I could label the Middle ages it would be dark
There were a variety of reasons that several hundred years of Europe's history was referred to as the “Dark Ages”. One pool of thought is that this period of time was not appropriately named as such because there is a lot of historical evidence about many of the people and their lives back then. Others would point to the economic hardships and the continual lack of jobs. To the new generations it could have been the need for academic opportunities. Despite all these negativities, historians don’t always agree on every aspect of the Dark Ages; they have their opinions. One possible reason that they don’t always agree is the abundance of cultural events that occurred during this era. The Dark Ages were called so due to the hardships faced by
When we consider Dark Ages, what do we consider? Pitiful individuals, touchy climate, extreme wars? Accordingly, when one individual alludes to the Middle Ages as the "Dark Ages" it is regularly pondered that the chronicled time wasn't exactly right. The Middles Ages was really the direct inverse. While everything was new thoughts and cheerful minutes, this is not defended by the expression: "Dark Ages."
When you hear somebody say the “Dark Ages” you may think it was a time without light? Or maybe you would think it was a time of evil. But in reality the “Dark Ages” were called the “Dark Ages” because historians believed that nothing interesting happened during this time. These historians are wrong. Though the “Dark Ages” may not have as many innovations as the Renaissance, but it certainly impacted our lives and there was certainly a lot going on during this time.
This parable is one of the strangest of the strange. Commentators are all over the map in their opinions of what we should
A World Lit Only By Fire: The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance: Portrait of an Age illustrates the past corruption of the Catholic Church. At the time, the church controlled the intellectual, religious, and political mindsets of the world. Few people were literate during this time, the Catholic Church held a monopoly over its people, and the vast majority of citizens vehemently rejected any and all attempts at changing the way society operated. Because of these three things, the “Dark Ages” can be considered the darkest point in the history of Catholicism.
The Dark Ages began after the fall of the Roman Empire. Much of Roman knowledge and culture was lost at this period of time, such as, art, history and technology. The time after the Romans is “dark” because there was no central or strong government events recorded and no inventions came out of this era. This a period of time that began in the year 410, the fall of Rome, and ended in 1095 with the launch of the Crusades. “The Dark Ages” was definitely an appropriate term for this era because of all the terrible things and events that took place. The Dark Ages were a period of constant war, terrible plague and religious division.
After the trump started his presidency, hate crime seemed to have increased massively. According to political scientists, Islamophobia is increasing the threat of terrorism. Some Americas have this fear that Muslims are going to ‘Islamize’ America which is--Islam is somehow trying to take over America or the world. But the possibility for a takeover is low as Muslim Americans are barely 1% of the total population in America. Islamophobia isn't just wrong in the sense that it's unethical for Americans but also, wrong in the sense that it's fundamentally inaccurate. Islamophobia is making the threat greater it is undermining our national security goals and thus, is dangerous. Islamophobia leads to hate crime against the Muslims in America. And, according to the FBI, hate crime data shows a clear sharp increase in hate crimes targeting Muslims beginning, in particular, around 2010 and maintaining a sustained heightened level. Trump, through media, is handing propaganda directly to the extremists. His hate speeches and his recent Muslim ban is giving the extremists exactly what they want-evidence that the West hates all Muslims. The extremists, who are barely 1% or less of the Muslim population in the world, are trying to recruit from the other 99% of Muslims and asking them to join their war against the West.