preview

European Invasion Research Paper

Decent Essays
Open Document

How did European Invasion in Australia change the lives of native Australians? The settlement of white Europeans in Australia was one of the most notable yet swept-under-the-rug events in history, just like other instances of he theft of land from rightful indigenous people. To Australia, Europeans brought with them disease, violence, and widespread turmoil, but also mechanic technology and advancements in communication and medicine. There are multiple sides to this debate, from the perspective of a native Australian, European invasion was horrific and ruined the natural order in place within the land, but a modern white man may say that settlement increased international ties and evolved the nation and functionality of Aboriginal life with …show more content…

Some stooped to animalistic levels to gain control over the people and the land that nurtured them physically and spiritually, falling to the atrocities now referred to as the Australian massacres of Aboriginal people. The Myall Creek Massacre is infamous for its consequences, after a group of white Europeans murdered 28 Aboriginal men, women, and children in 1838, some killers were tried and hanged for their crimes for the first time in history. The Myall Creek Massacre is a distressing reminder of Australia's provincial violence and gives an instance of modern-day reconciliation, it was the first instance of the rights of Aboriginals being recognised. European invaders presented their authority against Aboriginal people as they had firearms and civility and the Aboriginal people supposedly did not, sexual violence was frequent between European men and Aboriginal women, William Thomas recorded a number of occurrences of rape in his reports from the Victorian frontier. The violence and racism continues now with minor forced improvements and even 245 years later, Aboriginal individuals have no faith and no reason to trust white Australians or the criminal justice …show more content…

The fleet of power-hungry Europeans threw the balance they had perfected over thousands of years and set fences and boundaries which Aboriginal people had never wanted or considered before. William Hull suggests that "it is an accepted rule of civil life that no tribe can maintain a right to the soil unless it profitably occupies or tills it. Admitting such a rule, the nomadic tribes of Australia cannot be said to be dispossessed of their country." The functionality of the original custodians of Australia depended on frequent moving between areas to support their lifestyle and needs. Europeans, however, believed that this was immoral and they sought to "correct" the way that people were living so peacefully. This greatly harmed the lives of the many Aboriginal tribes who had not been previously wiped out by the disease brought to their country. Considering evolutionary patterns, the introduction of modern medicine and technology can be said to have been beneficial to the people who live/d in Australia. European invaders often questioned, "which has the better right - the savage … or the civilised man?" Which leads to this question, who really are the savages? The men who ripped apart unity and solidity and slaughtered land masses of people, or those who wished to live perfectly beside nature and profit personally from the bounty it had to

Get Access