Evaluate The Effectiveness Of Non Violence Methods

In the 1960s, many of the colonial nations of Africa were gaining independence. The ANC was encouraged and campaigned for democracy in South Africa. They were mild campaigns at first, but as the government became more hostile, so did ANC protests. In November 1961, a military branch of the party was organized with Mandela as its head. It authorized the limited use of arms and sabotage against the government, which got the government’s attention—and its anger! Mandela went into hiding in 1964, he was captured, tried, and sentenced to life imprisonment. It was a sad day for black South Africa.

Nonviolent resistance is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political noncooperation, satyagraha, or other methods, without using violence. This type of action highlights the desires of an individual or group that feels that something needs to change to improve the current condition of the resisting person or group. It is largely but wrongly taken as synonymous with civil resistance. Each of these terms nonviolent resistance and "civil resistance has its distinct merits and also quite different connotations and commitments.The modern form of non-violent resistance was popularised and proven to be effective by the Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi in his efforts to gain

All through history governments and empires have been overthrown or defeated primarily by the violence of those who oppose them. This violence was usually successful however, there have been several situations, when violence failed, that protesters have had to turn to other methods. Non-violent protesting never seemed to be the right course of action until the ideology of Mohandas Gandhi spread and influenced successful protests across the world. Non-violent methods were successfully used, most notably, by Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela.

While when discussing the history of the world’s power forces, violence makes for stimulating discussion, other tactics were put to good use, one of these alternatives being non-violence. With the guidance of three worldwide heroes - Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Nelson Mandela - with contagious optimism and high spirits, it became apparent just how much of a difference could be made carried out through non-violent terms. Mankind was introduced to another way to resolve major problems just as effectively, if not more, than violence could.

unjust” (Banks 1). “Principle four – accept suffering without retaliation for the sake of the cause to achieve the goal – this characterizes that nonviolent resistance is a willingness to accept suffering without retaliation, to accept blows from the opponent without striking back; accept the violence, if necessary; but to never inflict violence on another” (Banks 2). “Principle five – avoid internal violence of the spirit, as well as, external physical violence – a nonviolent resister not only refuses to fight or shoot his opponent, but he also refuses to hate him; at the center of nonviolence stands the principle of love for one another” (Banks 2). “Principle six – the universe is on the side of justice – this basic fact pertaining to nonviolent resistance is that it is based on the conviction that the universe is on the side of justice which is positive peace, consequently, the believer in nonviolence has a deep faith in the future and therefore, can accept suffering without retaliation. There is a creative force in this universe, that by whatever name we decide to call it, it works to bring the disconnected aspects of reality into a harmonious whole; a universal wholeness for each of us to share with one another and that nonviolence is both the means and the end” (Banks 3). Dr. King also had a couple of

Non-violence is a peaceful strategy people used in the 1900’s to revolt against the government. Martin Luther King Jr., Nelson Mandela, and Mohandas Gandhi had the most success in changing the way we live today. How did they get nonviolence to work? Well they were very disobedient, disciplined, and determined to make a change in society.

From the 1900’s through present day, equality and how to handle injustice situations have been hard. People all over the world struggle with being looked down upon or having rights that have been taken away because of racism, which can cause violence anywhere. In order for non-violence to be successful, the movement needs to have discipline, courage, and leadership because how you handle a situation is how you eliminate the problem. Nelson Mandela, Mohandas Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr have proven all of these steps to be true.

Nonviolence is the answer to the crucial political and moral questions of our time; the need for mankind to overcome oppression and violence without resorting to oppression and violence. Mankind must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love.

I strongly agree with the non-violent philosophy of Martin Luther King Jr for various reasons. First, and foremost if Africans Americans primarily relied on violence as a form of protest they wouldn’t of ever accomplished the goals they have accomplished till this day. Second, if they would have primarily relied on violence it could have backfired on them. It would have encouraged many people to appose the civil rights movement rather than support it. It would have given many Americans reasons to believe that because they were “violent” they didn’t deserve the right of public integration and the right to vote. By peacefully protesting it encouraged thousands of Americans to support the civil rights movement.

Before coming to a definitive conclusion, I believe it is important to first gain knowledge of the overall idea of “peaceful resistance.” Coined from its creator Martin Luther King Jr., peaceful resistance is labeled as “a courageous confrontation of evil by the power of love” (King, stride, 80). Being moral in its ethical practices, it was a nonviolent protest to what citizens considered unjust regarding societal and governmental issues. According to King, “the Christian doctrine of love operating through the Gandhian method of nonviolence was one of the most potent weapons available to oppressed people in their struggle for freedom” (King, Stride, 79; Papers 5:422). His notion of the nonviolence practice composed of six principles, first being that anyone can resist evil without the having to resort to violent tactics. Second, the “friendship and understanding” is the goal of nonviolent resistances, not by any means do they intend to belittle their opponent (King, Stride, 84). Third, only the evil in the conflict should be opposed. Fourth, one must be willing to endure suffering without retaliation. Fifth, nonviolent resistance avoids external and internal violence. And last but not least sixth, the nonviolent resister should be motivated by love and

Nonviolence doesn't deny the existence of conflict - conflict of one kind or another will probably always be present in human society - but it does show that no conflict has to be dealt with using violence. Throughout the history of the U.S., civil disobedience has played a significant role in many of the social reforms that we all take for granted today. The Women's Suffrage Movement lasted from 1848 until 1920, when thousands of courageous women marched in the streets, endured hunger strikes, and submitted to arrest and jail in order to gain the right to vote. The Civil Rights Movement, led by Martin Luther King, Jr. and others, included sit-ins and illegal marches which weakened segregation in the south. The abolition of slavery, including Harriet Tubman's underground railway, giving sanctuary, and other actions which helped to end

In my opinion I think that non-violence means when a person does not use force. The person is someone who is understanding. Yes, I am familiar when it comes to non-violence. My mom taught me and my siblings non-violence. I grew up poor so of course we had to understand that we can’t get everything we want. So when people would start fights of course we would back down . They would call us names for backing down but we understood what nonviolence meant. I would say yes that my mother succeeded in teaching me and family about non-violence. If my mother hadn’t have taught me and my siblings non-violence . We would have been in so much trouble that we probably wouldn't have gotten where we are

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. Rather than having violent movements and harming citizens, it is better to peacefully resist. Once a violence is used, the resistance to the law becomes nulled. People tend to not follow a violence protester. Once a violent riot starts, chaos is everywhere. People forget what they are truly fighting for. They unconsciously run away with the fear of getting harmed and dare not to go back. A peaceful resistance on the other hand leads citizens to join and support. People are able to see what they are fighting for and their real intentions. They are able to stand and cause no problem to people passing by as they are showing their support through silent voices. Many famous activists and leaders are for nonviolence. Mahatma Gandhi, a primary leader of India’s independence

One nonviolent tactic that Gandhi used to make nonviolence work was disciplined civil disobedience. According to Webb Miller, “The marchers were disciplined by native police who beat them with metal pipes” (Document B). Civil Disobedience allowed the Nonviolent Movement to work because the marchers were willing to die for change. Since they were willing to sacrifice themselves to get independence tales me that independence was really important to India. Even though the marchers got beaten up badly, they did not fight back. By not fighting back, India was getting closer to get freedom. Webb Miller was there when the marchers were getting hurt. He wrote down everything he saw and shared with the world. By sharing with the world, people put pressure to Britain because now the world know what Britain is doing to India. This helped India to get independence because it hurt Britain's reputation.

Keeping aside these basic facts, only a slogan for “peace” can’t change the society. In this context, Gandhian socio-political thought based on nonviolence can go a long way towards solving these problems.