Evaluate The Pros And Cons Of 360-Degree Appraisal

3600 feedback is a process in which someone’s performance is assessed and feedback is given by a number of people who may include their manager, subordinates, colleagues and customers (Michael Armstrong 2009:644). The debate surrounds a point of whether it offers a means of overcoming the traditional limitations of appraisal.

Although performance cannot be judge alone with 360-degree assessment, it provides a commentary aspect that will assist an organization in Leadership Development and Succession Planning. Including the 360-degree appraisal in the performance management process will provide a broader perspective about an employee’s performance and detail to annual appraisal. In addition, the technique facilitates greater self-development for an employee. Moreover, it enables an employee to compare his or her self- evaluation about performance with the perceptions of others.

Development of a performance appraisal system that is effective in a human service organization is of benefit for the organization and the employees. For a performance appraisal system to be effective, the system has to be strategic, designed to fit the specific needs of the organization, non-discriminatory, non-bias, with correct implementation and administration. Many different components, must to be incorporated to make this type of system beneficial for all who use it, and all who are evaluated by the system.

An effective performance appraisal system strives for as much precision in defining and measuring performance dimensions as is feasible. Some of the major problems with the Darby appraisal system are:

Next, the 360-Degree Feedback is also used to measure an employee’s performance. Through research, the 360-Degree Feedback sole purpose as David Bracken states is to “be seen merely as a tool or used as a one-time event. Rather, it must be understood as part of an ongoing process of assessment, performance evaluation, and discussion of performance with supervisors, subordinates, peers, and others.” More so, the 360-degree feedback is useful when considering the employee’s feedback and leadership skills.

A commanding performance evaluation is obtained from several different resources. A proper evaluation is not issued only from management but also with input from peers and subordinates. It is also not uncommon to have customers; both internal and external contribute to the appraisal process. Self-appraisal is also an effective tool for appraisal as it can assist with establishing goals for the future. This type of 360º degree appraisal process can provide a complete assessment of the employee’s strengths and weaknesses. Often times, this type of appraisal process can assist to identify area of concern that traditionally would not have been recorded. All evaluations should be recognized for their source. A self evaluation may be slightly biased and not overly critical where an appraisal from a peer could be affected by the employee’s willingness to properly cooperate with the process. The self evaluation has a tendency not to be objective in relation to the requirements of the position. An affective self evaluation must be based on the requirements of the position and not based on the judgment of the individual performing the activity.

Performance appraisal is a method of evaluating the behaviour of employees in the work spot, normally both the quantitative and qualitative aspects of job performance. Performance here refers to the degree of accomplishment of the tasks that make up an individual’s job. It indicates how well an individual is fulfilling the job demands. The purpose of performance appraisal is to update the worker on his progress, gauge his behavior and performance, praise good work, and note opportunities for improvement. A poorly conducted appraisal could cause the worker to lose morale, but a constructive performance appraisal can encourage him to go above and beyond the call of duty. People differ in

I am going to discuss the key features of a 360 degree performance appraisal. Some of the key features are that it measures are;

Managers are charged with making judgments about their employee’s performance and capabilities. Employees should have a formal evaluation process and should receive regular informal updates from their managers on the job. Performance Evaluations should include basic information regarding the employee, job objectives, job competencies, employee contributions and developmental goals and needs. A performance evaluation should also include an opportunity for management to focus on positive contributions the employee has made, areas that need development, and space for the employee to respond to the appraisal. Setting performance expectations, gathering outcomes from the year and comparing them will help determine whether they are satisfied or whether new initiatives are taken (Andersen, 2016). The

Therefore, it is suggested that she adopts a 360-degree feedback approach appraisal in order to get the opinions of not just the managers and supervisors, but, everyone.

appraisal that is legally defensible as well as an effective management and a coaching tool. The self-appraisal can help the employee by reminding his/her boss of overlooked accomplishments. For example, I list all the task I have completed. Half of the tasks listed, my boss is unaware until he reads my review. After all, few managers are aware of everything their employees do. Performance reviews can be the stuff of nightmares and fill competent professionals with fear, anxiety, and dread. Why? One reason employees dread reviews is because many companies, and even more managers, don’t understand the function and value of reviews as an opportunity for employee engagement, motivation and growth (Tourish & Robson 2006). Another downfall of annual reviews is many professionals approach their performance review as a one-way conversation and don’t do their part

Recently, I had the employees in my department complete a 360 review as part of the annual review process. Indeed, when the 360 review is conducted by an outside entity, analyzed, and reported; then, the feedback is both meaningful and truthful (Zenger & Folkman, 2012). Interestingly, the items I felt I was most proficient needed the most work.

Performance appraisal is an evaluation and grading exercise undertaken in organizations to achieve several objectives such as employee motivation, identification of training needs, rewards and remuneration, employee development through feedback etc. [Fig. 1]. All methods for performance appraisal have several advantages and disadvantages based on location of the firm, socio-economic environment, vision and mission of the firm, organizational structure and other factors. Organizations in different industrial sectors may have different focus areas of work and different values and thus, expectations from employees vary across sectors.

360 degree feedback system as a performance evaluation tool as long as the understanding of its intent is understood. “There are three key steps in the successful implementation of 360 degree feedback systems in an organization. The three steps are that it must fit the organizations culture, make it psychometrically sound, and used with care” (“Best Practices”, 2012). It is also important to train the feedback providers to be sensitive, respectful and polite. Treating employees in a friendly and respectful manner and offering constructive advice will make them more open to accepting the performance

On the other hand, poor performance, or mediocre performance may lead to negative appraisals and consequences, including job termination or withholding of bonuses, awards, and promotions. Performance appraisals are a systemic means of ensuring quality of work performance, and thus achieving the strategic objectives and advancing the goals of the organization. These performance appraisals, in order to be effective, must be applied in a uniform, objective, fair and consistent manner over time. In addition, the expectations of the performance appraisal must be clearly understood and agreed upon by the supervisor and the employee. Objectivity and fairness in the appraisal system build trust in the organization as well as high morale among employees.