Evaluating The Management Thinking, Compare And Contrast Humanistic And Classical Perspectives Of Management Essay

Humanistic perspective is a psychological perspective popularized by Carlo Rogers and Abraham Maslow that emphasizes the human capacity for choice and growth. This perspective offers a very positive viewpoint of human nature and potential. It suggests that we are each responsible for our own happiness and well-being as humans. “The humanistic approach emphasizes the personal worth of the individual, the centrality of human

The key element to humanistic perspective is free will. Without it, it would be impossible to reach our goals. When we allow others to control our lives and make decisions for us, our free will has already been used by someone else. That person has the advantage of both our happiness and his in his

In what ways are management of companies different or how are they similar to one another? And what is the importance of management in how a company runs nowadays? Many of us question about why knowing the history of management is important to Managers? According to (Samson et al, 2012, Page 53) “A historical perspective provides a broader way of thinking; a way of searching for patterns and determining whether they recur across time periods.” In the history of management, many trends have appeared. Many argue that the new techniques being introduced may not have a permanent solution. Others think that managers adapting to new techniques for continuous improvement in this ever changing world. It is important to know the background of how these management perspectives evolved and who and how is it being used now.

Eleanor Roosevelt once stated that “One’s philosophy is not best expressed in words; it is expressed in the choices one makes…and the choices we make are ultimately our responsibility”. Roosevelt’s statement accurately reflects how others view the personal management philosophies adopted by leaders and management personnel. What is remembered is not what individuals say, but what they do. Ideas and philosophical outlooks on life and management can have significant impacts on the lives of others. Each decision a manager makes effects not only those employees in their area of responsibility, but also the network of suppliers and vendors that interact with their organization. Due to the potentially large impact management personnel can have not only on their own organization, but also interconnected companies, it is key that all management personnel and those in leadership positions, take the time to reflect and develop a set of management philosophies that inform their outlook on the management process and their decision making process.

Every manager must have a set of principles, values, and core beliefs that he must follow. These principles, values, and beliefs make up his philosophy of management. Webster defines philosophy as “the most basic beliefs, concepts, and attitudes of an individual or group.” (Webster) I will be discussing the principles, values, and beliefs I as a manager will have to do my job efficiently. I will also discuss the different biblical beliefs that support my management style.

In a company, managers use a lot of different management perspectives and critical strategies to organises their people and improve productivity. Obviously, it is important to be a remarkable manager in a legendary company. So it is interested to find out how making the right management. Therefore, managers have to understand what the management perspectives are, and also need to know the way to operate them. In this essay, the definitions of two management perspectives will be introduced in few paragraphs which are classical perspective and humanistic perspective with realistic examples. And also, there are some subfields of the classical perspective and humanistic perspective to support the theory. Every theory has advantages and disadvantages, for this case, every different kind of companies need to use different management perspectives to operate their businesses.

The definition of ‘management’ is controversial and subject to much debate. There have been many contradictory views on what the term ‘management’ means and accordingly how one should correctly manage an organisation. These theories have been put forward by several highly regarded management scholars over time. By taking into account past knowledge and contemporary views on management, we are able to ‘’explore how thinking has changed through time’’. (Brooks, 2006). Moreover, businesses have, and can continue to be able to adapt these theories and put them into practice. Successfully applying correct management practices is especially vital in a global business environment which is becoming very competitive. ‘’Most management theories, even those that do not resonate comfortably with the prevailing mood, have attractive and valid elements to them.’’ (Robinson, 2005). For example, some of these theories can be seen flourishing in fast food chains like McDonalds.

To better understand how management can be applied in real life, I interviewed Ms. Nga Pham, who is a sales manager of a real estate company called NAMHOUSE. I met her in a summer course and became greatly impressed with her viewpoint of management. Although Nga does not have formal education and certificate in real estate, she is an expert in this field through multiple experiences and self-training. Her daily tasks often include coaching or instructing her subordinates and team members, delegating tasks for employees and building customer relationships.

At the current stage of development of mankind in the field of management, organizations are subject to challenges, challenges and pressures to which they must respond with a high degree of creativity and realism. The main challenges are given by the dynamics of the application of scientific-technical, the rapid emergence and acceptance of new products, increasing restrictions on Human Resources, material and financial resources, more aggressive and dynamic internationally markets, gains the growth of social demands and the revolution in information and communications. After these significant socioeconomic changes modern enterprises increasingly recognize the significance agree that owns the human

Every company has a unique style of management based on their type of business and their operation. Some of them are willing to take risks, some are at the top of the data, some focus on their employee relations, and others have the ability to innovate. Based on what is their headline practice, they styles of managements ranked between, Best Practicers, Data Champions, Controllers, Classics, and Forward Thinkers. The place that I have been working for many years Yata (fictitious company name) is a sales focus organization, and based on those categories, it falls in the classic styles.

In the classical viewpoint of management, great time and effort is put into the scientific method and scientific management. The scientific method is used in order to determine the best way to accomplishing each assigned task. The classic viewpoint also uses the theory that persons need to be scientifically selected and then trained to conduct duties. Encompassed in this viewpoint is the implication that management develop and assign all tasks, and employees are responsible for the completion of those tasks. The classical view point is often used in industry and refined the pay for performance incentives. The chain of command which so many of us are familiar with from the military is clearly depicted and used in the classical management

The history of management has been grouped into phases of development. Classical Management was introduced in the beginning of the 201th century. This addresses the organization’s search for efficiency on the basis that people will work for themselves and be economically beneficial. In other words, they work because they are determined by the economic concerns. Workers are expected to accept every opportunity that comes and they must work for it to achieve a personal and financial improvement. All of this has been supported by 3 theories in which the companies still used it today.

Theoretical frameworks for the management study are the schools of management beliefs about human beings and their work organisations are based on schools & study of management according to 19th century, although it has progressed through different stages & there are important factors of management practice. There are different methods of organising important aspects of good management practice .following are the classification of management:

In this paper I will be explaining the evolution of management from the beginning of the industrial revolution to present which includes Classical School of Management, the Human Relations/ Behavioral School of Management, Theory X and Y, the Scientific Approach, Contingency Approach, and Theory Z. I will also be comparing the classical style and the present style to each

According to Willis W. Harman (2001) people who lack self-motivation fit compliantly into this type of organizational management structure. However, a growing fraction of the population, displaying self-actualization tendencies are bothered by the oppressiveness of hierarchical management and are insistent on a more participatory role. Human relation approaches require decisions to be made with the maximum feasible involvement of those whose lives are affected by the outcome. This form of organizational management calls for the enhancement of humanistic values such as trust, honesty, cooperation, caring and personal responsibility to develop personal relationships.