Evaluation Of A Good Regulation

Why does the American food industry need government regulation? There needs to be regulation because of the sugar put into our food products which is the root of many nutritional problems. Sugar comes in many forms. Fifty-six to be exact. All of which is digested and broken down by your liver the same way. The average twenty ounce soda bottle has over seventeen teaspoons of sugar in it. That is an amazing amount of sugar and stress on your liver in one beverage. The body does need sugar,

While nothing is perfect, I think regulatory agencies are both necessary and good in creating balance in a growing and changing society. For the most part, regulatory agencies are good because they protect the public from unfair business practices, discrimination, and to ensure safety practices amount many other things. For example, the U.S Equal Opportunity Commission regulates and ensures businesses comply with federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate.

One may agree with the government regulating our food. Personally speaking, it is a good idea. It is a surprise how unhealthy people are when they eat out, they do not count calories and eat whatever they want. Some challenging the government would say calorie labeling has no effect on what we eat. Too many Americans are obese today and it is time to make a change and clean up our eating habits.

Food is considered a basic necessity in order to live. Each year, foodborne illnesses strike 48 million Americans, hospitalizing approximately 128,000 people and killing 3,000 (“Estimating Foodborne Illness”). Over time, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has implemented various legislations in order to prevent illnesses and reduce risks. In 2011, the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was signed by the President which was considered to be a “historical legislation” (Hamburg). Along the course of its development, the Executive and Legislative branches of the United States government played a significant role in approving and modifying the food regulation law. Since its approval as a legislation, the policies have been implemented in order to prevent problems that can make people sick however it is still a work in progress (Taylor).

Childcare centers entails state licensing standards that involve minimum requirements (Apple, 2006). According to Maher et al., (2000), licensing and standards affected program quality in positives ways. Rigby et al., (2007) noted that higher quality childcare centers required higher teacher credentials and professional development. The relationship between regulations and quality childcare includes both structural and process quality. Structural variables were easy to measure such as average group size, learning centers, materials at those centers whereas process variable consists of quality care that were hard to measure (Whitebook, Sakai, & Howes, 2004). NAEYC accredited programs were more stringent in regulations and higher in quality

There are several ways in which the food industry could help the consumer make healthy food choices. Food manufacturers/industry should be committed to providing clear, consistent, and honest product claims, as well as working with retailers and restaurants to offer consumers correct information about the products they are purchasing. The food industry should promote nutrition education and boost nutrition awareness at the consumer level. The food industry can create new products that meet nutritional needs, revise existing products to be healthier (limit levels of saturated fats, trans fat, limit sugar, and salt) and provide controlled portion sizes. With this, the industry can develop healthier

Diets have been a issue for the United States for a long time. The U.S. has thought about regulating peoples diets. This would make food healthier and better for you to eat. It would also eliminate junk food sold at stores and restaurants. The government should regulate peoples diets because it will help people be healthier, the food will be good for you, and the obesity rate will go down.

The imposition of larger penalties will be an integral part of making our food supply safer. First, the FDA will directly benefit from larger monetary penalties as the increased revenue from fines can be used to subsidize the addition of agents on an annual basis. This way, the number of agents will continue to grow to meet rising needs of the expanding food market. Next, the stiffer fines will also make it more of a risk for the companies who choose not to conform to governmental regulations. Thus, as the penalties pose larger financial risk for companies, would be violators will begin to find compliance more beneficial.

The next article focused on a criteria-based reminder to help decrease the duration of catheterization and increase proper catheter care, causing a decrease in CAUTIs (Chen et al., 2013). The criteria-based reminder was used to remind the nurse to check if the catheter could be removed and also reminds them the catheter needed to be properly cleaned. The research method was a randomized control trial (Chen et al., 2013). The sample of this study was from two respiratory ICUs in a medical center in Taiwan. The study involved 231 patients who had catheters inserted in the ICUs and 130 patients who had catheters inserted on other units (Chen et al., 2013). Data was collected by having urine specimens taken from urinary catheter patients on the unit, they then tested for urinary tract infections (Chen et al., 2013).

The FDA is moving in a direction of the food industry that they don’t need to regulate. The FDA is moving its mission as established by the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, heritage Foundation research fellow Daren Bakst writes “into novel areas that are unrelated to the food-safety issues that the law is designed to regulate, it would do so by regulating nutrition and diet through limiting food choices.” What the FDA is doing is combining nutritional and dietary well-being with safety and this doesn't work. Something such as an ingredient that causes health problems is one thing for the FDA to address seeing that it is in their job descriptions. Consumers can take control of their own diet and their trans fat consumption. The FDA

One may agree with the government regulating our food. People all around the world are obese and struggling to get healthy again. The percentage of obese people is rising and it is getting to a concerning level. When you are obese, you become limited in movement and jobs that you can get. The world still needs workers for the land and obese people cannot do that job because they cannot move as well. Obese people are restricted in the job category and many other categories. If the government does not pitch in to stop obesity, more people will not be successful, there would still be more ways to become obese, and people would just eat and not think of the calories that go into their daily meals.

The proponents of the Bill state that the nutritional information is going to be helpful due to many people having health concerns when dinning out. The major one being food allergies for example, peanut allergies or those who are lactose or gluten intolerant that have so much trouble when dinning out that they tend to avoid it as much as possible. The other health concerns are those people who deal with diabetes as well as high blood pressure. Food allergies and intolerances are a major worry due to how easily they can occur. The access to nutritional information of food items on a standard menu may prevent it and allow the person to maneuver around the allergen or food intolerance. This is something that has already been done through manufacturers, “Since 2006, U.S. food manufacturers have been required by law to list the ingredients of prepared foods. In addition, food manufacturers must use plain language to disclose whether their products contain any of the top eight allergenic foods—egg, milk, peanut, tree nuts, soy, wheat, shellfish, and fish (pg 22, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases).” The same opportunity should be given when dining out at a restaurant in order to prevent accidental consumption and thus a lawsuit waiting to

Regulating our food is not the best option. Banning certain food from stores and restaurants will only bring harm to their businesses. For example, “The ban would prevent retailers who sell prepared food from also dispensing sugared beverages, including sodas and sweetened

Furthermore, these regulations also act as a standard for the aviation regulators to issue certificates, licences, registrations and permits that is related to the aviation industry. This is to ensure that the particular holder meets the safety requirement in all the aspect that is included in the regulations and hence, making the airspace safer. To maintain high standard of aviation safety, safety education and training programs should be provided by the aviation regulators

Regulations are meant to protect the environmental and consumers. They take the form of permits, package, etc