Evaluation Of A Research Tool Essay

Nigel 's problem behavior includes cursing, making derogatory comments toward other students, yelling, spitting, and shoving chairs. Discuss the type of a measurement system you would use to collect data on Nigel 's problem behaviors and explain your answer.

External validity is when research findings are applied to the real world. When looking at 19-21 year olds on a college campus, we need to study a broad range of individuals coming from different cultures and backgrounds. We also need to look at which situations these are being applied to such as where they are there drinking habits taking place.

4.     What is more important in an experimental study, designing the study in order to make strong internal validity claims or strong external validity claims? Why?

Research Methods- refers to specific ways or techniques of conducting research on A topic. Example: two people do a study on dog anxiety. One uses existing data. The other uses data from research they have conducted through interviews of dog owners. Social Darwinism- The theory that people and groups can be thought to be under the same laws of natural selection as all plants and animals. Example: Believing that one race is superior to another. As if it were thought that one race or ethnic group was superior so they claim dominance over others. Reliability- The point to which an instrument of measure give recurrent answers and/or results each time it is used as long as the thing being measured stays the same. Example: The temperature in your vehicles engine stayed the same everyday. A reliable temperature gauge would give you the same temperature reading everyday. Note however, the temperature in the car could be different each day but if the gauge read seventy-five every day it would still be considered reliable. Ethnography- The study of different cultures and the people of the cultures. Example: A college student is visiting a school in a different county to study and take note of the different things going on in the school. Questionnaire- A research instrument including questions in an attempt to gather information. Example: A local gym has had a lot of complaints lately about cleanliness, but the members of the gym have not specified to the staff what needs to change.

2. select a quantitative research study. Identify and describe the method(s) used to describe the data in this study. Was the appropriate method(s) identified, in your opinion? Could other methods have been used to describe the data in this study?  Be sure to properly site the study you chose within your post.

For any measure to be valuable in psychological research, it needs to be both valid and reliable (Goodwin, 2008: 128). Research is reliable when more researchers have found the same results, or, within for instance behavioural research, when the same behaviour occurs at several measurements (Goodwin, 2008: 124). There are different types of validity. Firstly, there is construct validity, which measures whether an operationalisation of a construct actually measures what it is supposed to measure. Secondly, criterion validity determines whether a certain phenomenon is related to another phenomenon, and can accurately determine future developments. Lastly, content validity determines whether a test measures all aspects of the construct that is being measured (Goodwin, 2008: 125-126).

5. After examining the coding procedure, do you think these categories demonstrate construct validity? (Remember to justify your answer to demonstrate how you arrived at your decision) (Around 3 sentences) 6. What evidence is there to suggest the observations have acceptable reliability? (Hint: Ask yourself what information do we look for to tell us about reliability? Is this information included in the article?)?

There are two types of validities that could happen in an experimental design. These validities are called internal and external (Nieswiadomy, 2012, pg.114). The difference between internal and external validity is that one causes change with the depended variable (internal). While the other causes change to results that are more generalized involving other people and other settings (external).

b. Considering the problem area for the research, do you think that appropriate participants were selected? If you had been conducting this study,

The researcher will look at different methods and decide which should use to gather the information required to answer the hypothesis questions. These methods may both include quantitative and qualitative approach such as interviews, questionnaires, conducting experiments or gathering data through statistic. After choosing appropriate methods, the researcher will investigate possible ethical implications, validity and reliability of the data collected.

Reliability refers to coherence, stability and dependability in test results, generally using internal consistency to express the levels of reliability in the test. The higher reliability indicates the higher level of accordance, stabilization and dependability in test results. Reliability is the precondition of validity (Guba and Lincoln, 1981). The same findings may not generate if the same research is repeated, because many influencing factors may work in the process of research. The process of establishment in reliability research includes: the research rigorously collect and explain data in consistent investigation (internal checks); the process is transparent (sample design, field work, inquiry and rational data). Patton (1987) suggests that the use of triangulation in multiple approaches can increase the reliability in results.

1.The techniques used for rigorous methods that are used for the collection of data.The analysis and the attention to the various issues like validity, reliability and triangulation

The paper will examine and appraise a teaching session that I planned and implemented as a nursing student on a cardiology ward, in the form of a reflection what? So what? Now what? (Bortons, 1970). The aim of the teaching session is to provide up to date and relevant information to enable individuals to make an informed choices on there nutritional intake.

a. Conclusion drawn must be based on a sample that represent the entire group .

At the conclusion of our evaluation, our team will provide you with valuable insight into the Wish Granting process and any improvements that can be made to increase efficiency. As stated before, we will keep your staff informed of any things we notice as we go through the process and will submit a final written report at the conclusion of the evaluation. The final report will have a record of all the data we collect through interviews, observations, and data analysis. We also plan on having a presentation explaining our findings with the entire MAW GLA staff as well as any interested stakeholders.