preview

Evaluation Of Competency Test For Students With Special Needs

Better Essays

Through gathering data, educators have noticed that students with special needs are more prone to struggle with reading comprehension and literacy. Formal assessments such as, the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR) and Criterion-Referenced Competency Test (CRCT), are a major concern for students with disabilities and their teachers, because students are struggling with passing formal assessments and showing low abilities to comprehend the reading. In order to bridge this gap in literacy, teachers may use three effective literacy strategies for students with special needs. Question Answer Relationship (QAR) comprehension strategy, reading miscue test, and graphic organizers are strategies which will address low test …show more content…

Three Literacy Strategies to Help Special Needs Students with Reading Comprehension
Question Answer Relationship (QAR)
Question Answer Relationship (QAR) comprehension strategy has proven to lead to achievement gains for struggling readers and students who have been diagnosed with disabilities in the area of reading. According to Kinniburgh, “QAR provides a framework for comprehension strategy instruction. The questions posed before, during, and after reading require students to use multiple comprehension strategies as they formulate their answers” (Kinniburgh et al., 2012; Raphael, 1982, p. 3). The QAR strategy is important because it helps students make connections and differentiate questions they have while reading a text. In addition to that, QAR work as a cycle, meaning that each section of this strategy will direct students to either make more connections or leave them with different questions. The QAR strategy is very beneficial for students because the strategy is multi-functional and is able to adapt to different subject areas. This strategy can be used for either general education teachers or for special education teachers. In the Kinniburgh article, she observed one general education teacher and a special education teacher using the QAR strategy (Kinniburgh et al., 2012). The results of the pre and

Get Access