Evaluation Of Potential Evaluation Designs, Ethical Considerations, And Evidence

Nugent, W., Sieppert, J., & Hudson, W. (2001). Practice Evaluation for the 21st Century. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Evaluation is a process that is used to look at the project, policy or program critically. It includes the collection and analyzing information that is related to the program or policy and that of its outcome. The Main purpose is to improve the policy or the program effectiveness. This will also help to identify any of the weak areas and changes that need to be made in the policy.

As assessment is usually conducted at two phases in any project. (Burt, 2005) First it is conducted to

At first glance, the evaluation is well-conducted and carefully discussed by Aseltine and DeMartino without hesitation to outline potential issues with SOS’s long-term impact and weakness of the evaluation as a whole. More importantly, the evaluation methods are well-suited to the question asked

Evaluation is an assessment of something or making an observation of the outcome whether good or bad. An example of evaluating is after the Year 8 disco, was the year 8 pupil’s filing out an evaluation form on how they thought the event went. There are many different ways to evaluate such as minutes of meeting, questionnaires, post-event papers and circulation list.

INSTRUCTOR NOTE: You are being asked to comment on YOUR perceived value of this study. There is not really a right or wrong answer to these questions. This question is a simple way to uncover a basic understanding of the outcome measures. Outcome measures look at what is the value and applicability of the research in the real world. The author may or may not state the outcome measures in a clear manner. You can re-iterate the author’s view or draw your own conclusion. If the author does not state the outcome (which is often the case) state so and offer your own opinion.

Randy May works for a small airline based on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. He recently won two million in the New England Lottery and decided to invest his winnings, ultimately, in a chain of ice cream shops in the Cape Cod area to gain potential future earnings. Figuring he had enough money to open up ice cream shops in both islands of Nantucket and Martha’s Vineyard, as well as two shops in Falmouth and Buzzards Bay, he signed a contract with a local builder and began construction of the shops. After beginning the process of construction, he was faced with the next task of hiring employees to staff the four ice cream shops. Throughout his calculations, he estimated

According to Young and Solomon (2009) critical appraisal is a systematic process which can identify both, the strengths and weaknesses of a research study. During this process the reader is able to assess studies’ usefulness and whether or not the findings are trustworthy, it also supports in decision making in terms of whether to apply the study’s results in practice

The second evaluation approach would be outcome/impact evaluation examine the outcome and impact the program has on the targeted population. Furthermore, the evaluation can be useful

IDEA requires the administration of a multifactored evaluation using a variety of valid assessment tools and strategies to gather information related to the

With the continuous changes in healthcare, evaluation of students’ clinical knowledge and skills relies on the need for continuous evaluation. Evaluation is the process of using data to make judgements about students’ individual performance. Evaluation of clinical performance provides data from which educators use to judge the extent to which students have acquired specific learning outcomes (Billings & Halstead, 2016). With the use of best practice evaluation methods, clinical performance can be evaluated to ensure quality patient care. Educators face a challenging task when providing evaluation that is fair and reasonable. Tasked with evaluating students in the clinical setting, educators can evaluate how students integrate theory and apply it to real-life situations. Observations of performance in the clinical setting should focus on the outcomes to be met and competencies to be developed (Oermann & Gaberson, 2014). Developing a clinical evaluation tool to determine whether students can think critically, prioritize problems, and complete patient care procedures correctly is essential. There are a variety of evaluation methods to use in nursing education. Depending on the learning outcomes to be measured will determine which tool best evaluates the students’ performance. Clinical practice is an essential and highly significant component of nursing education. Education programs are obligated to respond to government requests for well-educated healthcare professionals.

An assessment center is “a variety of testing techniques designed to allow candidates [or current employees] to demonstrate, under standardized conditions, the skills and abilities that are most essential for success in a given job” (qtd. in Coleman 3). Typical assessment center techniques include tests, structured interviews, in-basket exercises, leaderless group discussions, role plays, case studies, presentations, and writing samples (Campion 2014). The results of these techniques can be used for multiple human resource functions, including selection, placement, promotion, development, identifying early managerial talent, and managing succession (Gaugler et al. 493, Thornton III and Byham 3, Spychalski et al. 71). In addition, assessment centers can help organizations detect organizational deficiencies, inefficient procedures, and training deficiencies (Hale 18). The versatile nature of assessment centers makes them a beneficial tool for human resource management.

Using the decision criteria as previously set, the above cited alternative are appraised and rated as follows:

I would like to stress that any research on the issue of the study is admirable, given the enormous ethical, practical, methodological, statistical issues involved. In my evaluation, I take this into account. That said, I do have to raise some potentially unpleasant questions about the design of the study; operationalization of the key measure; procedure/ sample; and analysis.

The following evaluations were