This written document will discuss assessments within the early year’s foundation stage which I believe to have the potential of creating positive outcomes for children and families in a mainstream primary school where I am currently a teaching assistant. Throughout, I will make reference to “reception children” which covers ages four and five of the EYFS. I aim to justify this element of practice using a combination of literature and reflective experiences to evaluate how this practice contributes to quality outcomes. I aim to develop an action plan (appendix 1) that supports the improvement of assessment at Foundation stage level and critically and reflectively discuss the role and style of leadership that may be required to overcome any …show more content…
The literal meaning of Whariki is 'the woven mat ', on which everyone can stand on, "it interweaves principles and goals into different ways which each setting can develop their own particular learning methods" (Carr & May, 2000, cited in Soler & Miller, 2003, p63). Te Whariki assesses children in a very different way to the EYFS in the United Kingdom. They assess children through learning stories; and have no set goals that they must attain by the end of the curriculum. In comparison, both assessment processes are ongoing throughout the curriculum. After researching, I am aware that the Te Whariki curriculum and the Early Years Foundation stage are similar. They both stress the importance of inclusion and working with families. The Te Whariki assessment process 'learning stories ' seems more enjoyable, however the EYFS use a checklist, this can also be seen as a positive aspect because practitioners are able to monitor the child’s holistic developmental progress. Monitoring is also done through homework sheets (appendix 2 and 3) which gives parents a chance to communicate with school staff by leaving notes about how the child got on with the task(s). A homework policy is already in place 9appenddix 4)which allows every parent to understand homework rules, and the roles of all staff, parents and children in relation to completing homework tasks in time. It could in fact be argued that the EYFS has been influenced by the Te
The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) curriculum in England differs greatly in structure and content to the Te Whariki curriculum in New Zealand; this therefore makes for an interesting comparison. The EYFS was introduced in England, in 2008, by the DfE as a framework that ‘sets the standards for learning, development and care of children from birth to five’ (DfE, 2012). Alternatively, Te Whariki was founded in New Zealand, in 1996, based on the aspirations for children ‘to grow up as competent and confident learners and communicators, healthy in mind, body, and spirit, secure in their sense of belonging and in the knowledge that they make a valued contribution to society’ (Ministry of Education, 1996). Throughout this essay, the EYFS
The Foundation Phase was introduced to nursery level children at the start of the 2008-2009 academic year and each year after until all students in nursery, reception, year 1 and year 2 were taking part in this first stage of the new Welsh Curriculum (DCELLS, 2008a). The curriculum for the Foundation Phase is set out in The Framework for Children’s learning for 3 to 7-year olds in Wales (The Framework) (DCELLS, 2012). The main focus for the Foundation Phase curriculum is that the children learn by gaining first-hand experience through activities that may challenge them but are enjoyable so that they the children seek out experimental learning and active involvement themselves (DCELLS, 2008a). The Framework has several key messages (DCELLS, 2008a) and they link with the experiences that the children should be having. To get a better understanding of the experiences the children ought to be receiving it’s best to go back to the research and the reasons why the Welsh Assembly Government (WAG) decided to change the curriculum.
The Foundation Phase is constructed to provide consistency to each child’s education during a crucial stage of their development. However, the consistency does not affect the challenge of the curriculum: Children are given more opportunities to enhance their knowledge through practical activities, open ended questions and problem-solving. The proposals made up by the Welsh Assembly Government [WAG] for the
The Foundation Phase is constructed to provide consistency to each child’s education during a crucial stage of their development. However, the consistency does not affect the challenge of the curriculum: Children are given more opportunities to enhance their knowledge through practical activities and problem-solving which are both unrestricted allowing room for enhancement (DCELLS, 2008b). The proposals made up by the Welsh Assembly Government [WAG] for the Foundation Phase included a curriculum that reinforced and enhanced those put in practice by the Awdurdod Cymwysterau, Cwricwlum ac Asesu Cymru’s [ACCAC] document “Desirable Outcomes for Children’s Learning Before Compulsory School Age (2000)” (DCELLS, 2008b, p. 3).
The early childhood are the most vital time for learning, therefore observations, assessments, planning and evaluation are an important part of the curriculum for children’s
A significant factor that divides the approach the most is the role of assessment/ documentation. Equally, both approaches emphasis the need for documentation of children work. They carefully displaying and documenting children’s thoughts and progression of thinking; making their thoughts visible in many different ways. Nevertheless, assessment is only a requirement in the EYFS with the exception for children to meet their level of development. The EYFS work on a system of observation, assessment and planning. Due to, the practice guidance for the EYFS which states ‘All effective assessment involves analysing and reviewing what you know about each child’s development and learning.. and to plan
According to Puckett and Black (2008), assessment is embedded for a variety of purposes to determine, develop and analyse student progress and to generate an informed view of the child's level of understanding which meets mandated and accountability conditions. This assignment investigates the significance of meaningful and ethical assessment, current theories and philosophies, key principles and practices all within early childhood with focus around a kindergarten perspective. This assignment will also professionally critique a transition
In contrast, Dennis, Rueter, & Simpson (2013) validate authentic assessment with a case-study of a child transitioning from Early Childhood Intervention Services into public school. This exemplifies the intricacies required for progress monitoring by using methods of authentic assessments i.e. interviews, observations (running records, anecdotal records, ABC Analysis) portfolios and a performance-based assessment to confirm that this process not only identifies delays, but “...provide a basis from which the teacher can design a targeted strategy for a child or group of children” (p.191). As a result, a plan was developed to help the case-study learner transition into his/her new setting.
The Foundation Phase curriculum was created and planned to be a progressive framework which takes place over the first four years of a child’s education (3-7 year olds). The Framework for Children’s Learning for 3 to 7-year olds in Wales (“The Framework”) aims to meet the wide range of needs of the children across the Foundation Phase by providing them with the opportunity to develop a large range of skills which they will be able to use for future learning and apply to their everyday life. The curriculums main focus is the holistic development of the child and the aim to build upon their past learning experiences, skills and knowledge. The Framework sets out 7 key areas of learning which include: “Personal and Social Development, Well-Being and Cultural Diversity”, Language, Literacy and Communication Skills”, “Mathematical Development”, “Welsh Language Development”, “Knowledge and Understanding of the World”, “Physical Development” and “Creative Development”. These 7 areas of learning should be taught in a cross curricular way so that the children can develop all 7 of these skills/ area no matter what lesson they are having. “They should not be approached in isolation.” DCELLS (2008:14).
Assessment is an important part of a high-quality, early childhood program (NAEYC, n.d.). Teachers need to assess student’s learning throughout the school year in order to monitor their progress. With this information, educators can plan developmentally appropriate curriculum and individualized instruction for each child. Assessments help to identify students who may need additional support and determine if they need intervention or support services. Kiddie Academy utilizes both formal and informal assessments of children. Each has benefits and limitations depending on what information the teacher is looking for. Early childhood educators often use informal observation methods to collect data on their students as these methods are easier to use and more appropriate for program planning (Radecki, Sand-Loud, O'Connor, Sharp, & Olson, 2011). Informal assessments can be used more often. They are not data driven, but rather performance and content driven (Appl, 2000). And, they can be used to gather information about a child’s development in their natural environment. Overall, assessments of young students help to keep teachers and the program curriculum responsive to the needs of each child.
There are many different types of assessments that are used during different situations and some during different times during the year. Each assessment has its own uses and also its own ‘rules’, which can be categorized as formal and informal. Formal assessments are assessments usually given through tests and are referred to as standardized tests. Informal assessments are assessments is mostly given in natural settings and include tools such as running records and anecdotal notes. This research paper will focus on formative assessments that have been standardized and will answer the questions of what, why and how. Assessments, based on my understanding, can be simplified into three different areas and each area is essential to the overall success of children as they become adults. The areas are considered to be the ‘purposes of assessment’. The three areas include screening assessment, diagnostic assessment and also instructional assessment. When thinking of using assessments in Early Childhood Education the important key questions to focus on is why, what and how. Why means knowing why an assessment is needed. For what purpose is the assessment being used? What means deciding on what type of assessment should be used, in what situation. First, will it be an informal assessment? Or a formal assessment? And last is how the assessment will be used. This includes the setting, time and the process of the assessment. Understanding the key questions of why, what and how is
The main focus of this report is the use of assessments in Early Years Education. These assessments are of different kinds depending on the purpose for which they are conducted. Assessments for high stake purposes test the feasibility of programs in achieving state goals and are usually required by government agencies and funding bodies. The other more common assessment is undertaken to observe a child's progress. It helps to determine the most effective mode of instruction for him/her and for notifying parents of their children's development. This report focuses on the latter and highlights programs that have been implemented in different school settings and the learning outcomes from each program. It is hoped that this report will provide readers with some best practices that can make learning assessment even more effective consequently ensuring that the objective of the No Child Left Behind program i.e. to reduce learning gaps between children from different backgrounds is achieved.
In Aotearoa, the early childhood curriculum Te Whāriki has an immense focus on children’s holistic development which is fostered and guided by interconnecting principles and strands that construct the curriculum. Within the strands, there are goals that teacher’s educators must follow to provide high quality teaching to sustain and fulfil the curriculum.
Past experiences as well as trial and error has shaped the current curriculum for children in the foundation phase in Wales, to ensure that it covers the seven areas of learning and the key messages, which are taken from the Framework for children’s learning for 3 to 7 year olds in Wales. The curriculum provides a structure to learning, to ensure that all children are receiving the same coherent experiences that will help to develop and progress the skills in which the child will use throughout their life. These experiences will be derived from a holistic approach to learning, in which subject knowledge, literacy and numeracy will be interlinked across the curriculum. The relationship between learners and teachers is that of great
Te Whariki is an integrated curriculum this is evident by the woven mat (Ministry of Education 1996. P13) this shows how the arts and literacies can be integrated, throughout the New Zealand curriculum Te Whariki in a New Zealand context. To form the mat there are four lots of principles which include; Holistic Development, Empowerment, Family and community and relationships. There are also five lots of strands including contribution, communication, exploration, well-being and belonging. The principles and strands which are interwoven all support and promote the child’s holistic development.