Evaluation Of The Execution Of An Evaluation

Policy evaluation applies accepted social science research methods to public programs. The same research designs used in laboratory experiments are not always practicable in the field, but the same principles can guide the planning and execution of policy evaluation.

To whom would you report the evaluations results, and how will your report(s) be tailored to various stakeholders? That is, what will different stakeholders need to know, and how is that information best consumed?

Moving from my informal evaluation methods acquired from examine my biases, to mitigate against bias in a more” formal “evaluation process the evaluator still first must examine themselves honestly and be clear on their position, their allegiances and their adversaries. It goes without saying that evaluation reports should not be unfair, unbalanced or inaccurate. Yet truth is elusive and even the most scrupulous evaluator must struggle to see that carefully collected and analyzed information is not later distorted, intentionally or unintentionally in presentation. Then look at the American Evaluation Association’s Guiding Principles, briefly stated

Evaluation is an assessment of something or making an observation of the outcome whether good or bad. An example of evaluating is after the Year 8 disco, was the year 8 pupil’s filing out an evaluation form on how they thought the event went. There are many different ways to evaluate such as minutes of meeting, questionnaires, post-event papers and circulation list.

A process evaluation is a tool utilized to identify the key components of intervention that are effective and under what conditions. Additionally it also evaluates the extent to which a program is being implemented as planned. A process evaluation can be broken down into six steps which are depicted in the diagram below. In order to engage stake holders the process must begin at the evaluation cycle. Stakeholders in regards to our program include those who are directly involved with program operations. This includes the staff utilized to procure supplies and equipment, those involved in the delivery of supplies equipment, those who distribute educational materials, those that perform diabetic testing and those that interact with the target

This research analysis is meant to measure the effects of this particular program against the goals it set out to accomplish as a means of contributing to subsequent decision making about the program and improving future programming. This applied research study is an evaluation research project of social science that is intended to supply scientifically valid information with which to guide public policy. The goals of this evaluation research are to provide feedback to policy makers in concrete and measurable terms.

Program evaluation is the process of collecting information about a program in order to make decisions about it. Including an evaluation plan shows that you take your objectives seriously and want to know how well you have achieved them. More and more foundations and donors expect to see an evaluation component in the programs they fund.

This should set out the overarching purpose of the evaluation, and how the findings are expected to be used to inform decisions. This section also describes the Evaluation Questions (which should be limited to just a few key questions). It can also identify key audiences for the evaluation.

One example of a process evaluation she does is to find out student satisfaction of services and to address any inefficiencies. Last year a survey was emailed to students who used the service at the end of the year. Some strengths of this evaluation was their data collection and survey method were more efficient after upgrading from paper to electronic resources. With an emailed survey they got a higher response rate than using paper surveys. However the response rate was still low since the survey was sent out once at the end of the year. Person A wanted a higher response rate, so she implemented a change by sending out the survey to students shortly after they used the service so she will continuously collect data and be able to analyze it at the end of each semester. More students have replied since the survey was sent out right after their use instead of asking them about

Leslie Pal discusses the ways in which a government or private corporation goes about evaluating a particular policy or program in order to ensure they are only putting forward something that has enough benefits to outweigh the costs. Pal stipulates that evaluating a policy or program is incredibly crucial as it determines whether it has been successful, whether the outlined objectives have been met, and what could be done to make it better in the future (Pal 2009, p. 271).

Linnan and Steckler (2002) describe the following key process evaluation components: Context-aspects of the larger social environment that may affect implementation; Reach-the proportion of the intended audience to whom the program is actually delivered; Dose-delivered-The amount of intended units of each program component that is delivered; Dose-received-the extent to which participants engage with the program; Fidelity-the extent to which the intervention was delivered as intended ( Bartholomew et al., 2011. p.525).

According to the Health Education as Educator, evaluation is defined as a systematic process by which the worth or value of something is judge and specifically refers to teaching and learning. Evaluation is important in healthcare education because it allows insight on how well information received is being grasped and understood. In the healthcare setting it is critical that clients or patients receives correct information about care in order to be compliant with the physician’s order or discharge instructions. Evaluating the healthcare professional measures the competency of the individual and can further determine if additional training is necessary.

The purpose of the evaluation is to make sure that our program as a whole is on the track to success. We want to evaluate our current problems as well as future problems we may have and see if we can solve them now rather than later. We want to make sure that our entire program is on a steady path and that we will not be blindsided by any issues that may arise. Our program rationale is a key component to developing our program as we want our goals and objectives to be clear as well as how we will identify the needs of the community that need to be met.

Over the years, program evaluation is an essential tool for value check of either the whole program or some aspect of the program (Psoavac and Carey, 2007). Program evaluation is more popular in health related educational programs. In order to determine the extent the educational system achieves its stated objectives and goals, Tylers in the 1930s developed a model (Owston, 2008). The model developed by Tylers shows a deliberate simplification of how the objectives of the education program are achieved. Tylers evaluation model was used in one or two generations of educational program evaluators (Scriven, 1999), and acts as a basis for developing the present models. However, the present models went beyond determining the

According to Rossi et al (1993), “evaluation is the systematic application of scientific mediums to assess the design, implementation, improvement or outcomes of a programme.” When evaluating a programme, it is useful to be armed with a selection of tools, so that an evaluator’s professional arsenal allows them to be flexible and to employ different techniques based on the individual problems and situational needs of the programme. Regardless of the numerous variations to evaluation both the goal-oriented model and naturalistic evaluation model are equally popular and widespread. Nevertheless, these models differ in certain spectrums and their effectiveness comes from cardinally opposite sides of evaluation methods.