Evaluation Plan For Project Development And Implementation

Evaluation is a process that is used to look at the project, policy or program critically. It includes the collection and analyzing information that is related to the program or policy and that of its outcome. The Main purpose is to improve the policy or the program effectiveness. This will also help to identify any of the weak areas and changes that need to be made in the policy.

Avie can assess the effectiveness of this strategy by using the benchmarking. Benchmarking involves comparing Avie Products’ processes and practices with the competition. This will allow Avie to measure how fast and how far they have progressed with their strategic plan. The metrics used are human capital metrics which assesses aspects of the workforce and HR metrics which assesses the performance of the HR function.

In a project the communication level is a very important part from the beginning to the end of project close out and completion stage. This method in the plan is extremely necessary and it is a needed tool that helps assist the project team, the stakeholders, and the executive team of Enterprise. This tool is effective and it makes sure all members involved with the project is on the same level of understanding, it makes sure all involved stays updated on the

Outcomes are the changes, benefits, learning or other effects that happen as a result of your work (Cupitt and Ellis, 2016). Most importantly, outcomes allow your work to be more effective. This includes identifying what works well and what are the changes for improving the task. Ultimately this aids in using efficiently in order to satisfy consumers’ needs and wants (Cupitt and Ellis, 2016). On the other hand, evaluate means to measure results or outcomes (Endvawnow.org, 2012). For this section the team will be conducting an evaluation of the original management plan as well as the approved changes of the project.

Improvement plan must be in place in order to decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the Mr. B scenario. The model for Improvement gives us the foundation and the frame work for doing improvement work. It is structured around several key components. There are 3 questions that are presented on this model. First question is what is your aim? We have also ask ourselves how good we want to be and by when we will like to achieve it. Second question is how would you know a change is an improvement? Which gets to measurements, we want to look at process and outcome measures. The third question is what changes can we put in place to achieve the aim? What change we can put into place that you can tract with data and you can match back up against your aim (Lloyd, 2009).

Evaluation is an assessment of something or making an observation of the outcome whether good or bad. An example of evaluating is after the Year 8 disco, was the year 8 pupil’s filing out an evaluation form on how they thought the event went. There are many different ways to evaluate such as minutes of meeting, questionnaires, post-event papers and circulation list.

I am choosing to write summative projective-wide evaluation plan; which looks at the short-term to long-term outcomes of an intervention on the target group. This evaluations will look at information such as community needs, activities and or services, desired results, indicators, method of measurement, type of instrument, minimum level of success, steps, etc. The evaluation will analyse the process and outcome of the program. The evaluation will also discuss the goals and how they are measured.What are the measurement tools you would use? I chose to evaluate the Peace Domestic Violence Agency which is located in the Portland metropolitan area working with families affected by domestic abuse.

Evaluation can be time consuming and expensive where some people cannot complete the evaluation due to this constrains. My points of view, the main two factors are the resources and lack of measurement tools. The evaluation resources (staff salary and benefits,

The outcome evaluation process consists of a six stage model. The first stage is to build agency commitment and to clarify expectations. The second stage is to build agency capacity to measure the outcomes. The third stage is to identify the outcomes, indicators, and data collection methods. The fourth stage is to collect and analyze the outcome data. The fifth stage consists of improving the outcome measurement system. The sixth and final stage consists of using and communicating the outcome information.

The evaluation is the last key activity of the action cycle; in the evaluation the MAPP process members need to know what has been accomplished through this process. All MAPP process phases and conducted strategies need to be evaluated (NACCHO, 2016).

The main objective of implementing the evaluation tool is to ensure progress and performance of the evidenced based change projects. Various types of the evaluation tools are

The staff may see evaluation as a way of being the primary focus and become resistant. Also, most staff believe evaluation will negatively affect their work and focus on things that aren’t really important. Staff may see evaluation as taking up more time which will effect program services. The program not having proper communication between administrative and management about the benefits of evaluation. Administrative can see evaluation as having negative results on the organization. Another issue is if an organization wants to generate consumer outcome information with regulatory information there is a risk

Evaluation of the program should be ongoing, in the best effort to target issues within the program as efficiently as possible. Evaluation should be built into the program, making it effortless for those involved to provide the necessary information to create useful evaluations. Additionally, any evaluation should be cost effective, so as to not hinder the program as a whole. Any evaluations must also be done ethically and conducted competently. It is also important to disseminate the results of evaluations to interested and appropriate audiences.

Program planning is the implementation of evaluation process. It is the groundwork where priorities are decided and the results are analyzed on a measurable scale.

Thank you for your sharing your assessment of formative and summative evaluation methodologies. I agree with you assessment that both forms of evaluation add tremendous value to a program (Staten, 2015), as well as the organization for which the program evaluation is being conducted. You made a wonderful observation regarding the nature of formative evaluation and the methods of communication which may be used. As you pointed out, formative evaluation may be communicated simply be sending periodic emails (Staten, 2015). Often evaluators may feel that elaborate mechanisms of formative presentations must be made in order to add value, and yet quick methods of communication like email, allow for immediate access to the information