Everyone Should Be Able To Vote Research Paper

American citizens shall be able to make use of all technology available to digitally track their vote for the president of the United States.

Even with all the technology we have, we still have an electoral college to represent us. Having this technology, citizens can represent themselves, and then the president would win the election by a majority vote. The candidates would receive a true number of votes straight from the people, instead of from representatives. Any citizen that is registered to vote could go to a website and cast their own vote, and at the end of the election each person will know that their vote truly stood for something. They would know that their vote was an actual factor in deciding who the president is; therefore, this gives power back to the

Although EVMs (electronic voting machines)provide qualties of convience,security, modern technology, and etc., it will not make citiznes vote. "They help more people vote more easily." (Line 1) This satement is not only inaccurate, but an excuse made for people who do not realize the power and priveldge it is to be able to vote.

I think voting should be done via EVMs in the following essay I will tell you why, and also tell you how to fix some of the problems that voters may have with EVMs.The first and one of the most valueable assetts provided by EVMs is it's ability to provide ballots in different languages.A voter in which english isn't thier first language is less likely to go out and vote due to a fear of not understanding what they are voting for which is why a machine that provides ballots in an array of languages will most likely improve the number of voters.Paper ballots come in only 4 languages this is due to high printing cost with the EVM you save the printing cost and provide accessibility to ESOL voters.A second benefit to the EVMs is easy access to

Political elections in the United States needs voters to physically go to the polls to cast their vote, and in an age where technology consumes most of our day to day activities, people are seeking out convenience more than ever. In 2004, more people logged in to vote on American Idol than showed up at the polls for the presidential election. At the rate technology is developing, online voting is still a debated issue. Although there are some downsides, like with anything, online voting is more efficient and accurate. It makes the right to vote more accessible to everyone, but the disabled and elderly will benefit most from it. When voting is as simple as logging in and taking a few minutes to cast your vote, more people will be motivated to vote. Online voting would make a positive impact on the United States voting process and would motivate more Americans to vote.

In 2000 Riverside County California decided to spend 14 million dollars to make their voting system all electronic. This decision was made on the basis that in 1998 more than one million dollars was spent on paper ballots (in Riverside), but when only half of the county voted the extras had to be trashed. For local elections their new electronic system fetched a 99% approval rating from voters (Wired.com article). The only foreseeable downside to this technology is the start up price and with internet voting not likely due to security issues, this maybe the best solution.

I believe that the city should use EVMs. The world today is becoming more electronic because it's easier and faster to use. EVMs would be a great alternative to paper ballots because of three reasons. They are accurate, time effiecient, and user-friendly.

Voting is supposed to allow everyone the opportunity to voice their opinion, but with these new laws, such as presenting a photo ID, everyone is not getting a say so, so the votes aren’t accurate.

The United States of America should stick with old school paper ballots. On paper is safe, reliable, cheap, and cannot be tampered with. Protecting your votes should be top priority.

If people’s vote is not counted in the general elections; many unfavorable laws may be written; the people’s beliefs will not be listened by their candidate, and citizens will not be able to decide what the best for the country.

I believe that the use of EVM's is a relatively useful tool needed for the voting process.

Being an adept of advanced modern technologies, I disagree with the author about considering communication technologies a danger to American democracy. Accepting or not, we live in a fast developing world where digital technologies have become essential in order to ensure a better life. Accordingly, e-voting represents an accommodation of the society to the digital world and makes citizen more responsible for their actions. By pressing the button on the digital screen to express a political preference, the citizen assumes responsibilities. Therefore, citizens have to press the button that indicates their political preferences and nothing else. Citizens should not overthink computer security since the government has enough resources to ensure

It is better not to use EVMs macines.Voting is a right that has to be taken seriously. It is best to stick to a method that everyone is most comfortable in.The reason why is the cost,time consuming and are not assesible to everyone.

I believe that Electronnic Voting Machines would be extremely useful to todays society of people, especially in the United States. As the top article has stated, there is 33.7 million people of vating age with disabilities who are unable to get to the voting stands without major difficulty, that's 20 percent less likely to vote, which causes a major difference in the actual amount of people who believe in one topic over another. There is also the concept of having a machine that can change languages per user, so if we were to have a card that had our information on it and our first language than we could also help with the minority that don't know how to speak in English. Though there are plenty of arguments about EVMs being able to get hacked

A voting system has four characteristics: accuracy, anonymity, scalability, and speed. Current electronic voting machines claim to