Everyone's Sake If The Dog Park Was Built

I think dog parks are a good idea. Dogs need alot of exercise and play time. Many cites and urban areas just dont have the room for that to happen. But there are optoins there many open unused lots, and empty building that could be torn down to create these places. I am a dog owner myself i live in the country were open space is abundant. My dog Neno can run a play all he wants it's good for his health and mental state. When he doesn't get out he gets cranky and chews thing around the house. I grew up in a city of five millon, so i know how hepful a dog park can be to dog owners. You should always have your dog around other people, and animals,

Before you jump to the hasty conclusion that I’m opposed to a dog park because I do not have a dog, let me assure you I do have a dog and am aware of my responsibilities as an owner. The principal argument for a dog park is “exercise is important to dogs’ mental and physical health.” I would take this argument a step further and state exercise is also

The town has a scarce amount of public space for recreation so I believe that when things are created they should equally serve all the towns people. The town already has a very low amount of public goods and for the goods that are available they're too pricey for everyone to attend. I feel that it would be a good idea to make a dog park, but they should also split it into two and make another park that's usable for the towns people and children. That way nobody will feel left out and they can make the best use of the small public space availability. Also the local schools would be very close to the dog park so the children could make use of the park if it was for both pets and

To many complications will come from a dog park. Such as situations like a dog attacking another dog or even attacking someone else. This can cause a lot of upset owners. Also many painful court cases. Dog parks will bring up a lot of legal issues that we don't need.

Dogs should have their own parks,because when dogs aren't getting the physical and mental excercise that they need, their behavior tend to get worse. ASPCA has a study that shows the rate of dogs biting humans went down drastically in places where they're dog parks. ASPCA also believes that if dogs had a park then their would be less incidents of dogs attacking humans,barking, and destroying things. Many dog owners have given their dogs up , because they started to act like''bad dogs'', this is because they don't have a dog park to excercise all their energy everyday. Dogs need a park just like humans.

I believe most if not all cities should have a public dog park. Since I was nine years old I have always owned a dog. I have lived the city all of my life as well. Living in the city there is many apartment buildings with little to no yard space. To keep a healthy and friendly dog the dog needs exercise and play dates. Because most pet owners in the city have no yard space for these activities. a public dog park is the perfect solution.

Studies show that roughly 2 million pet dogs end up in the shelter every year from lack of exercise or being lonely. That alone should be a hint that building a dog park could benefit us. You can even think of the park as a therapy treatment for your companion. It can also benefit a lot of citizens from Muscatine, because nearly 70% of their residents live in Rental units(mostly buildings), which means there is very limited space and areas to where you can bring your pet. The less freedom the more you risk giving your dog the chance to act out, destroy furniture, etc.. and you don't want that.

Dog Park in Muscatine, IA I think a dog park would be a great idea for the city. Exercise is very important for a dogs' mental and physical health. Socialization is also another great reason to have a dog park. Its also a good way to raise the property values of a community. I believe that a dog park would be good for not only the dogs, but for the owners as well. Exercise, socialization, and love are the key things a dog needs to be happy. The ASPCA says dogs with no exercise can act out by barking and destroying things at home. My friend had a dog that spent most of the time in his kennel, and she got rid of him because he was too hyper and destructive while he was out. Bad behavior caused by dogs being lonely and poorly exercised is partly responsible for 2 million dogs that end up in U.S. shelters every year. So why not

The dog park is a great idea. Dogs should burn off energy thoughout the day, to keep them locked away could be unheathly for them. Some concering points that were made in the passage was how the dog could become vicious from a lack of freedoom leading to being taken to the shelter.

Dog parks in the city would help dogs get daily excercise and it would help them get in shape and it would also help to calm them down beacuse it is proven that dogs that get daiy ecercise tends to be more playful,less noisy,and isin't mean. but the cost of building a dog park would cost up to 70,000$ just for the fence thats not including a building permit and all the work. Most dogs would benifit from having a local dog park but the federal cost of funding a dog park would be outrageous even though it was proven dogs that get daily excercise tends to be more happy and less viceous. There was approximitly 40,000 dog bites a year from New York after they received a dog park the number dirasticly dropped to 4,000 a year. Accordin to the ASPCA

If you're going to own a pet, take into consideration the space needed and responsibilities at hand, especially a dog. Stated in the first "beneficial" dog park passage, it is said that dogs become aggressive and can cause more issues if they are kept indoors and don't get much exercise and fresh air. I do not disagree in the least bit, but creating a dog park in the middle of a place with lack of space with assumingly

In conclusion, I disagree with the person from the first passage because building a dog park could allow off-leash dogs to attack other animals or people. I also think that building a dog park would be a burden for who evers live nect to it. Finally I think that building a dog park would be a massive waste of time, money and

The issue reguarding whether there should be a dog park in any city can be reasonably argued both ways. Some people say that the dog park would raise the noise level and disturb people's sleep, and this could be reasonable, except that in a city there are a lot more louder noises to worry about than a dog barking. Also, nobody I know is going to take their dog to the park at night time. Whether or not the dogs in your local city are feral or not seems a lot more important than keeping the noise down. Especially if dogs will be walking down the street instead of at a dog park, and there are always dogs in the city. This is supported by the dramatic decrease of dog bites reported anually in New York (40,000 to 4,000)after they could be a

Would you rather have a dog park, or be the victim of a dog-bite? I would perfer to have a dog park for safety. Some dogs have a temper like us adults and can act up at times. Because it's our city ordinance for dogs to be off-leash in public areas, a park is needed. Personally I believe that, exercise is important to dogs because of it's mental and physical health, socializing, and bad behavior caused by dogs.To begin with,exercise is important to dogs because dogs can act out by barking and destroying things at home. If a dog isn't getting enough exercise it can become very cruel. A dog can obtain mental and physical health problems. With that being said our neighborhood need a dog park.

A vast majority of citizens in one city own dogs. Some citizens would prefer having a dog park for there dogs, but some do not think it would be the best idea for the community. Dogs can get out of control, attack others, put other dogs at risk and so for. Dogs can also get out and communicate with each other and have the best behavior. People have different opinions on this situation and i think adding a dog park in cities would be an excelant idea.