Evidence-Based Decision-Making Steps

From the case study, Case 2.1, debate two pros and two cons of evidence-based policy making, by considering the concepts of “ technocratic guidance” and “technocratic counsel.”

This report finds that data-driven decision making involves the collection, combining and crunching of data received from multiple sources throughout the organization. The technique can contribute to the improvement of Acme’s decision making process as a whole. Acme gathers

Since I finished, principle of evidence based pharmacy practice class in my first year of pharmacy school, I was curious to know what are the areas where we needs to use evidence based decision-making. I started learning more and more about evidence based practice for standard treatment of our patients and also seen the clinical pharmacist or community pharmacist integrating evidence from relevant and reliable sources to form evidence based conclusion or recommendation for the individual patient. So, my learning experience from class about how to integrate reliable sources using PubMed search and seen a pharmacist integrating evidence from Lexi-comp, Micromedex and clinical trial for their patient specific recommendation prepared me to participate

Concepts, practices, and effective decision-making strategies to promote patient safety and quality improvement begins with leadership to communicate expected standards of care to staff, promote active involvement in the quality improvement (QI) process, create a blame free environment in order to address near misses, errors, or adverse events, establish the use of Six Sigma as the benchmark for QI, and determine discrepancies between care provided and unit standards by root cause analysis (RCA) (Marquis & Huston, 2014). Childbirth by itself is an exhausting process and coupled with rooming-in, evaluations by staff and lactation consultants, and visitors, there have been increased numbers of infant falls during the hospital stay. These falls

One thing we know is hard when making a decision is having bias therefore if practicing evidence- based decision making you would have the best data to and evidence to create your choice with and without bias (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). I feel if this evidence-based decision making was used before the cheaper well was purchased this could have been avoided altogether. In this model, there are five steps to process the information before making the decision (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). You must identify the setback or prospect, gather information about the problem and evaluate, gather information from outside research, gather information from stakeholders and ponder ethical repercussions, collaborate all data together and make an informed decision

Evidence-based decision-making represents a process of conscientiously using the best available data and evidence when making managerial decisions. Step one is to identify the problem or opportunity. Step two is to gather internal data about the problem while step three is to gather external data. In step four, this information is integrated with an ethical implications are considered. Finally and stepfather, of the information is at the greeted and critically appraise to make a final decision. More effort to clear clearly identify the problems creating the well abnormalities may have helped the disaster. Instead of relying just on data, if the decision-makers a place more episodes of gathering external evidence in step three, they would have

When considering the implementation of the evidence-based practice (EBP), several factors act as the organizational support. The main ones are the support from the management and the leadership, facilitation and a conducive environment that is ready to accept changes (Gerrish & Clayton, 2004). If the management and leadership are supportive of the EBP movement, they will help the staff overcome the barriers of EBP. Therefore, they make arrangements for the employees to find time and resources to conduct research for the evidence that has scientific backing. They will encourage the staff to follow this new movement and help facilitate the EBP. The employees who work under a supportive leadership will enjoy the privilege of authority to make

A good methodology to organizations such as the PRC is the practice of evidence-base data driven decision making. In fact, evidence-based decision making is a directional approach to organizations when creating or making decisions supported by the collection of data (Power, 2014). Unfortunately, this is a tool which is not practice at the PRC and it is necessary for Mrs. Lewis and her future partners to have in place. According to research, practicing evidence-based data decision making is a lifelong commitment, which keeps on making positive transformations and improvements to organizations (Mandinach & Jackson 2012). Additionally, the importance of adopting such a practice can benefit executive directors like Mrs. Lewis and provides a greater

Some of the takeaways from this case I have noted are using the Evidence Based Decision-Making process will help remove all emotions and biases on the decision as we will be using supporting facts that are accurate to help support generating the best decision possible. In the Deepwater Horizon Disaster case study, the team members were aware of the well performance issues as they were happening and informed executives. One of the major takeaways was once they were notified of the problems with the well’s performance, they did not act on the notifications which resulted in the problems continuing to build up. If the team had taken action when the irregularities were happening and treated each deviation from the norm as such and had a standard

Evidence-based decision making could have been used to avoid this disaster. Evidence-based decision making is when the best available data and evidence are used when making management decisions (Kanicki & Kreitz, 2010). Had this process been utilized and the biases avoided, the companies would have realized through research and data that a possible disaster is imminent if actions are not corrected. By using EBDM, the five step model would have prevented the disaster by using evidence to make decisions rather than ignoring the issues.

To begin, decision making involves choosing one alternative from a group of one to several options. For example, when a manager is tasked with seeking a location for a new building for expansion, one must first identify a set of potential locations. Next, assess each area in terms of the relevant criteria established. Finally, the manager must make a selection by choosing one of the locations. The general idea of evidence-based practice is the concept that good quality decisions should contain critical thinking and the best available evidence to support the decision. Although management practitioners may use evidence in their decisions, many pay little to no attention to the quality of that evidence. This practice results in bad decisions based

I agree with you, Patricia. Even though most researchers focus on the statistically significant results, the goal of the clinical researchers should be to have clinically relevant findings. The statistically significant data do not reflect the clinical picture in many situations. In a clinical perspective, the effect of treatment has a major role in the clinical decision-making (Page, 2014). Any new clinical intervention aims at bringing about a positive impact in people (Leung, 2001). Even though the evidence with clinical significance may lack the statistical backing, it indicates the effect of the treatment. Therefore, the clinicians should appropriately use such data along with their judgment in the clinical decision-making.

It is recommended that at least two investigators are involved in every phase of systematic review starting with planning so mistakes and biases are avoided and review can provide accurate results.

In theory Evidence Based Management (EBMgt) is making the best possible decision with the most current available research and tools available. EBMgt emphasizes gathering and paying attention to the data, understanding the best current theory about the subject of a particular decision, and continually updating both theory and evidence as new information becomes available (PFEFFER, 2012). In the process creating principles based on evidence to which to follow. Sound like a walk in the park, but principles are credible only where the evidence is clear, and research findings can be tough for both researchers and practitioners to interpret (ROUSSEAU, 2006).

Evidence-based decision making (EBDM) is defined as, “a formalized approach to clinical care in which the clinician, in consultation with the patient, uses the best scientific evidence available to make decisions about clinical interventions needed to optimize personal oral health” (Wilkins, Wyche, & Boyd, pp. 25, 2017). The PICO model of EBDM, will be used to determine the best treatment options given the following clinical situation: For a 25 year-old male, with a Class I on caries on #14, Class III caries on #6, who consumes several sports drinks a day, and has 1 pre-existing amalgam filling on #2 (P), which restorative material has a higher success rate, amalgam (I), or resin composite (C), to restore his teeth (O)? Restorative “is to