preview

Evidence Based Practice In Nursing

Decent Essays
Open Document

The Ganz et al. (2009) research was performed in order to evaluate the ICU nurses oral care routines and if they were using appropriate, up-to-date evidenced based techniques and lastly if evidence-based practices (EBP) was associated with personal demographics and professional characteristics. Ganz et al. (2009) had found that previous research and studies has shown that poor oral hygiene may contribute to greater risks for pneumonia which results in an increase in mortality and morbidity (Ganz et al., p 133). In fact some of the research studies had stated that there was no documentation of the nurses oral care practices and these practices were not even up-to-date with recent evidence (Ganz et al., p 133). In addition to that, ventilator-associated …show more content…

There are guidelines that are implemented to support health care practitioners and their patients with making important decisions about health care issues that need special attention (Roddy et al., p 347). These guidelines caused concerns since the present day methods doesn’t allow upgrading the strength of recommendation (SOR) for random selecting participants/subjects in controlled trials that are impractical or unethical (Roddy et al., 2006). Roddy et al (2006) conducted research to develop another technique to determine SOR as well as combining research and expert views (Roddy et al., 2006). The research on developing new recommendations for exercise in managing osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee was explored attention (Roddy et al., p 348). The Delphi technique is a group project and was used in this research study. It is often used and is a recognized method for gathering data from a panel of experts within their area of expertise (Hasson, Keeney, & McKenna, 2000). The Delphi process is built upon the principle that forecasts or decisions from a group of regulated individuals are more accurate than those from unstructured groups (Hasson, Keeney, & McKenna, 2000). Questionnaires are answered by the group of experts than a summary of the information is examined to determine the mean or median scores of the results …show more content…

One reason is that although the participants are expertise in their field of study, they still rely on the other group members to collaborate on the topic which bring about changes on how to resolve the issue (Hasson, Keeney, & McKenna, 2000). This process consist of multiple feedback rounds which tends to result in lower response rates due to the multiple questionnaires received by the participants and can also result in them not continuing or withdrawing from the Delphi process (Hasson, Keeney, & McKenna, 2000). The Delphi process is often time consuming and arduous taking up a large amount of time (several days or weeks) needed to complete the process (Hasson, Keeney, & McKenna, 2000). An experiment done by Scheibe, Skutsch and Schofer has shown that Delphi group participants would change their answers after receiving a biased feedback (Adams, S. J. (2001). When one look at the practice of evidence-based medicine it requires some level of clinical expertise combined with the best available evidence from methodical research (Roddy et al., p 348). Despite my feelings on the Delphi technique, I also think that guidelines can be instituted in a clinical setting to create or improve strength of recommendation. Roddy et al. (2006) however did use more reliable and valid statistical resources such as visual analogue scale (VAS) and one way ANOVA analysis. The VAS is a measurement

Get Access