Evidence Embezzlement Process Paper

Computer forensics are used in many fields, from legalities involving trade secrets to prevention of computer-related fraud; however, more and more computer forensics are being used to help solve crimes of all kinds. Computer forensics have both obvious and less obvious implications in a criminal court and are a helpful new tool for prosecutors and police alike.

One of the drawbacks of computer technology and its use by law enforcement is that digital or electronic data and evidence obtained during investigations may easily be modified, deleted or lost. This fact makes the admissibility of such evidence in court to be contested thus slowing down the prosecution of crimes.

The Rules of Evidence must be adhered to. A forensic computer investigator has to follow the same principles of evidence and admissibility of evidence as well. It is crucial that I do not violate their privacy I do not want my case thrown out at a “suppression hearing” because I overstepped the legal

Over the last few years law enforcement has shown some major development and growth when it comes to forensic technology. The use of things such as cell phones, computers, gps devices has drastically increased. As a result, these devices regularly contain vital evidence, including user data, call logs, position, text messages, email, imageries and audio and video recordings. When it comes to cyber forensics, law enforcement has a substantial challenge in keeping current with technology changes. New technology is released onto the marked very quickly, both hardware and software. It is imperative that these agents know when these things will hit the market and how to use them. The enormous capacity of information contained on digital devices

There are areas in which a computer forensic investigator should know where to look for digital evidence for a criminal case.

Forensics is a very important aspect of criminal justice. When a crime is committed and there aren’t any witnesses to the crime, forensic evidence may be the only thing that prosecutors have to work with. The use of forensics also helps identify the perpetrators of various cyber-crimes. Forensic specialists can search databases, IP addresses, and recover documents to determine who is responsible for a crime. As a result, this makes forensic labs a necessary investment for an organization.

Identification is the search method and comprehension of suspicious events. Collection is the aggregation of artifacts that can contain potential evidence. Acquisition is the process of generating a duplicate data set from a corpus. Finally, preservation is the process to preserve and ensure the integrity

Fraud in the financial community is consistently hidden in "style." Since its beginnings in the "great depression," to now, "the great recession" fraud has undoubtedly taking many forms and styles. Subsequently, many non suspecting patrons have been severely damaged as result of this greed and corruption. Many of America's largest and most established companies are not exempt from this form of style manipulation. As we will soon see, many corporations, including Enron, have both the ability and incentive to commit fraud. In today's fast paced information age, fraudulent activities are now becoming more difficult to detect, and even more difficult to prove. As a result, the demand and subsequent use of forensic accountants will be very important in the future as litigation continues to take hold of the financial services industry. Firms such as JP Morgan, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, and larger banks have now been subjected to large amounts of litigation and negative publicity. The need for forensic accounting during these periods is high as their skill set warrants their use in court.

The reception officer functions as a) the public face of the laboratory and b) to ensure consistency of information and legal commitment. The reception officer will act as the point of the contact and reference for clients. A reception officer’s functional requirements include a) a solid knowledge of managing investigation processes and b) a proficiency of translating investigation requests into realistic sound forensic expectation. He or she will be responsible for managing relationships with a) various laboratory divisions, b) law enforcement officials, c) attorneys, d) criminal and civil court personnel, and e) peers. The reception officer will be expected to adhere to laboratory and company policies when a)

All crimes come in different forms. Computer-related crimes are no different (“Most common schemes: Identity crimes,” 2009). In some computer-based crimes, a computer is used to commit the crime, such as in copyright infringement and illegal file-sharing cases (Volonino, Anzaldua & Godwin, 2007, p. 67). To best investigate these crimes, an investigator must understand how to “preserve and authenticate” all electronic evidence that pertains to the case (Volonino, Anzaldua & Godwin, 2007, p. 67). This training manual will provide an overview of copyright infringement and illegal file-sharing crimes, as well as explain how to conduct a seizure and search of evidence. In addition, the manual addresses investigative concerns related to these cases.

While the basic rules of evidence are the same for paper and electronic records, there are several important differences. Compared to paper records, most courts consider electronic records to be more voluminous, more difficult to destroy, easily modified, easily duplicated, potentially more expressive, and more readily available. As a consequence, strict new rules were enacted in December 2006 requiring the preservation and disclosure of electronically stored

Incident response and forensics investigations are closely related aspects of managing the activities that occurs after an information technology (IT) incident occurs. In this paper, we will explore the various aspects of incident response and forensics as they apply to an IT incident and by examining the details in the enclosed case study, we will show how those aspects apply to that situation. To begin with, we will discuss the differences between incident response and forensic activities. Next, we will cover some of the challenges involved with first responder handling of evidence as it applies to incident response and computer forensics. We will also be covering some of the steps required for a comprehensive forensics and incident response plan. Additionally, we will outline the steps required for effective integration of forensics and incident response procedures in externally contracted forensic situations. Lastly, we will present a brief evaluation of the incident response resources available to manage incident response and forensics activities.

To ensure that the integrity of collected evidence for court date presentation is preserved, evidence that is obtained at each crime scene is collected by specially trained analyzers, known as forensic scientists. These individuals gather, package, and

“Computer forensics is the equivalent of surveying a crime scene or performing an autopsy on a victim” (James Borek 2001). We need to ask ourselves a question, how many people in our organization had or will have any law enforcement training, anyone would have the qualifications and the skill to present enough evidence that can and will be acceptable in any court of law. No matter what kind of incident there is, the analysis should not be treated differently. Any manager or supervisor knows how to examine the incident? Is the company going to do their own examination of the incident by using their own personal, should the owner/s bring extra support from the police

Over the past two years, corporate America has endured a plethora of fraudulent acts committed by those of high status within their respective corporations, most of which involve internal fraud. Internal fraud has two main aspects, misappropriation of assets and fraudulent financial reporting, with the focus of this discussion lying within the former. Misappropriation of assets is defined as fraud for personal gain. It is the most common type of fraud found among employees and frequently includes theft of cash and inventory.