Evidence Of The Most Gruesome And Unforgivable Crime

In Whitechapel, London in 1888, an insane serial killer roamed the streets who became known as the “Whitechapel Butcher.” (Jones) No one knows who actually did it so over the years the murderer

The Birmingham paper of Wednesday morning, December 5, contained headlines that would have been enough to capture anyone’s attention. On December 4, the body of a nicely-dressed girl around the age of eight or nine years old was found floating in the lake in the Birmingham suburbs known as East Lake. Her body was found by two teenage boys by the names of John Keith and Ben Cluberson who were innocently playing in a boat. The Jefferson County Coroner conducted an initial exam and determined that the cause of her death to be murder. Unable to identify the little girl, they placed her body for viewing in hopes someone would recognize her. Just a few days later, the local butchers identified her as being May Hawes, the oldest daughter of Richard and Emma Hawes.

Hello, good afternoon everyone, I would like to give special thanks to everyone who has attended trial today, especially the jury and the judges. this today I am presenting my side of who is the killer in the night drive. In the short story, Night Drive, we were left with a major question at the end of the story. Who is the killer on the frighteningly eerie Colchester road? The evidence we have concluded from the broad sources that we have, we think that Mr. Tabor is the killer. Now we will verbally express our evidence to support our claim.

Good morning everyone, my name is Devin, and today I wanted to tell you the gruesome story of the Crawford family murders. On July 1st, 1970, in a quiet suburban neiboorhood of Melbourne, Australia, a man by the name of Elmer Crawford would brutally murder his wife and three children while they slept. According to a news article by Author Andrew Koubaridis, police alleged after bludgeoning his wife unconscious, Elmer Crawford then took a 50-foot electrical cord, crudely fastened with alligator clips, and attached the clips to his wife Therese’s ears, fatally electrocuting her. What happened next was truly disturbing and horrific, as Elmer Crawford then went room by room, one by one murdering his children “with what pathologist believed was a hammer” (Koubaridis,2015).

14 year old Steven Truscott gave his classmate Lynne Harper a ride on his bicycle on June 9, 1959. Truscott had dropped her off before they parted ways. Lynne was reported missing later that night, and two days later, her body was found on a nearby farm. She was sexually assaulted and strangled to death. The community was horrified by what happened to this young girl and everyone was determined to find the killer. Immediately, investigators became fixated on Truscott as the prime suspect since he was the last person to see Lynne. They didn’t consider any other suspects, even though there was no physical evidence linking him to the murder. He was arrested 24 hours later, and stood trial as an adult. (Steven Truscott |

All was well, I thought I was living “The American Dream”, until one day, one day I will never forget. While walking home with my partner David Hawke, from Bridgeport Restaurant in Chicago, I encountered a horrid crime scene, the most gruesome I had ever witnessed before.

In the O.J Simpson there were a lot of things that went wrong. One of them was the issue of the way they collected evidence it was all miss handled & they didn’t collect with professionalism they just did it but didn’t care they way that they did it but based on that all the case was a disaster. One of the first evidence was a bloody fingerprint that was located in the gateway of Nicole Brown’s house one evidence that the detective didn’t collect it. They kept on going with the investigation & the detective when they switch shift were unaware of how the evidence & the case was going. The forensic scientist in the case collecting the evidence didn’t do right his/her job all the evidence was so sloppy.

The prosecutors’ case is nothing but a precariously built house of cards. It has no reliable witnesses nor any substantial evidence, rather it relies on the sole testimony of the alleged victim Mr Paul Onions, a man whose calibre throughout the case has not only evoked scepticism and self-contradictions during cross examination but has not fit my client’s physical appearance. The defence team subpoenaed credible eyewitnesses whose descriptions of the abductor’s appearance matched Mr. Onion’s initial descriptions which were, “good looking…. smooth hands and face, looked like a bank teller, an eerie type of person, 6 feet tall, fit with broadish shoulders”. These descriptions pointed to criminals including a man from Wollongong whose ex-wife testified of his criminal antecedents such as, paedophilia, domestic violence and being a top suspect to the police for the backpacker murders. Furthermore, the children (Robert and Sarah Somerville) of this same man witnessed their father decapitate, shoot and stab his victims with his accomplices in a forest and as a burial ritual, they would lay their victims faced down, disembowel (eviscerate) them then place logs on them and note that these were the exact nature of the deaths of the 7 victims my client is been scapegoated for. On the contrary, the state tried to rebut such evidence by stating that the kids must have been lored by the

There are many serial killers known throughout time, but one stick out more than any; Jack the Ripper. If you have never heard of Jack the Ripper, you should know how he is still one of the greatest mysteries of England to this day. One of the things you need to know about the mystery of the Jack the Ripper case is his victims. In each homicide the victim was a prostitute with a reputation of drinking quite heavily, placing the victim in a high-risk category. (“ Jack the Ripper Part 1 of 1.”)

Despite many Western countries having strong law systems and firm roots in Christianity, it might seem peculiar to think they also are obsessed with murder. From Nancy Drew to the TV shows Murder, She Wrote and How to Get Away With Murder, murder and crime investigation have become bestsellers in Western societies. There is just something intriguing about a good “whodunnit” crime, a good mystery that cannot be solved or explained, regardless of how many people and years have been spent speculating on it. In England, one of the most popular unexplained homicide cases is none other than the infamous 1888 murders of Jack the Ripper. While the killer was never found and convicted of the murders, several conspiracy theories have emerged over the years concerning Jack the Ripper’s identity and the motive behind the gruesome slayings.

A segment of the Forensic Science in the Criminal equity organization that the vast majority acquainted with these days, however, few individuals know how this particular science came to be. Overall, legal science is intended to utilize experimental standards to clarify obscure parts of a wrongdoing. Through the utilization of uncommon tests and lab gear that permits researchers to recognize decisively different parts of a bit of confirmation in an illegal behavior. On the off chance that you occupied with finding out about how this procedure came to fruition, you have to peruse the recorded data underneath. Here is a brief history

In the dark early morning hours on the streets of London’s East End between the months of August and November in 1888, a deranged and depraved person would roam the streets to murder at least five women participating in prostitution in the Whitechapel district. On November 9, 1888, fate would have Mary Jane Kelly brutally attacked at her place of residence and subsequently murdered and mutilated beyond imagination. The most likely suspect was the increasingly bloodthirsty and still anonymous killer dubbed Jack the Ripper. Nearly 130 years later, forensic science and criminology experts have failed to agree on the true identity of Jack the Ripper. Hopefully, through psychological, geographical and genetic profiling, a better perspective of who

Today, more than ever, the quality of evidence in criminal cases is scrutinized because of contamination. Contamination is the introduction of something that physically corrupts a substance at a crime scene that was not previously there; it comes in many forms and most often times comes from the humans who investigate a crime scene. It is imperative that prevention of cross-contamination is implemented when gathering evidence. Several of the more sensitive forensic techniques such as trace analysis, bloodspatter interpretation, and DNA comparison are not being used to their fullest potential. Items of physical crime scene evidence are not always visible to the naked eye and may be easily overlooked so deliberate and methodical approach to collection and preservation of evidence is essential. Prosecutors have lost cases due to crime scene contamination; this could be prevented by simple and productive behaviors. The U.S. Supreme Court, in a leading case on physical evidence, stated:

You are in shock. You are confused. You feel indescribable, unbearable pain. This pain is so emotional that it affects you physically too! Someone has ripped your heart out of your chest and made you watch as they relentlessly take a knife to it. All hope is lost. You will surely die from this ordeal. At least you wish you could! Your heart is weak; it drops into your stomach making you nauseated. How will you ever heal? You have been broken.

The concept and study of victims has three distinct eras. The Golden Age of victimology began around 2000 B.C. where tribal law was the rules, regulations and collection of laws and there was no getting around it. Victims would seek revenge and assist in determining the type of punishment, which usually was compensation. Problems with tribal law was as families grew vendettas could lead to banishment of families or families were repeatedly victimized. It was an age of a form of discretionary justice that concluded that this method was not working.