Evidence Outline

Before the court can exercise personal jurisdiction or the lawsuit can began against Playskool Inc., the court must have proof that the defendant was notified of court lawsuit. When formally

be described. Jurisdictional requirements for this case as well as the reasons why it was heard at

6.What is the level of court, the case is being heard in? 2 marks (1 mark each article)

Parties to the Case, Facts of the Case, and Business Reasons for the Dispute (30 points)

Is where a magistrate will hear the prosecution’s evidence and decide if it sufficient enough to send the accused to the District or Supreme Court for trial.

There is such a thing as limited jurisdiction and general jurisdiction. There are reasons courts

Reasoning: Determining jurisdiction is critical because jurisdiction not only allows the party to know whether that court is entitled to adjudicate a dispute, but it can also help determine which laws are applicable, which can make a difference in a party's recovery. For example, Georgia and Delaware might have different laws regarding damages so that Elle may have an advantage in one court as compared to another court. In order for a court to be able to exercise jurisdiction, the court must have some connection to either the parties or to the event in question. Therefore, the possibilities for jurisdiction include: the district court for the state of Georgia, the district court for the state of Delaware, or one of the state courts for either Georgia or Delaware. In order for federal jurisdiction to apply, the circumstances of the case must meet the requirements for diversity jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction refers to that federal court jurisdiction involved when the parties involved are from two

64: Original jurisdiction which means it can try all cases dealing with such subjects as:

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) centers on the question of the meaning of the word "commerce" and whether a state government can make a contract with an individual giving him exclusive rights to run a steamboat line between New York and New Jersey on the waterways. An issue arises when New Jersey then wants to make a contract with someone going back and forth from New York. The question becomes who holds the power to regulate the water. The Court determined the definition of commerce is "intercourse," which means that even if a body of water is located in New York it comes under the jurisdiction of interstate because at some point the

In the court case Gibbons vs. Ogden (eg. Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)), the New York legislature granted a monopoly to operate steamships between New Jersey and New York. Gibbons intervened, claiming that this was going against what the commerce clause stated. Instead of focusing on whether the state could, the court focused on the issue of a state regulating commerce while Congress is also regulating it. The court decided against this by saying that pursuant to the commerce

In the case of Margolin v. Novelty Now the appropriate court for this lawsuit depends upon several factors. In personal jurisdiction the book states that the courts are given the power to provide a decision in affecting the rights of individuals (Kubasek). In this case, the court will give a decision giving rights to Mr. Margolin, and taking rights from Novelty Now. For subject matter jurisdiction, a certain specified court will be able to hear the case This means, that it must be decided which court hears the case, whether state or federal jurisdiction. Since this case contains three different states, the federal court system must be the one to hear the case. In this case, minimum contacts must be determined to decide if a certain state will have power to assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant from another state (Kubasek). In this case, it must be decided if New York will take personal jurisdiction of the defendants residing in California, or Novelty Now residing in Florida.

case can go t the Supreme Court.This paper will also identify the merits of a case that can lead to

It is the essential criterion of appellate jurisdiction that it revises and corrects the proceedings in a cause already instituted, and does not create that case. Although, therefore, a mandamus may be directed to courts, yet to issue such a writ to an officer for the delivery of a paper is, in effect, the same as to sustain an original

University systems include, but are not limited to: servers, desktops, laptops, workstations, PDAs, network servers/processors, or any other electronic data storage or transmission device.

Keeping in view the distinction with respect to the subject matters of Public and Private international law, it is mandatory to specify the distinction between The Law of the Seas and The admiralty law and the chapters succeeding will be a great source to enlighten the same.