Evms Vs Paper Voting

I will reflect on my persuasive speech regarding why the electoral vote is better than the popular vote. The beginning of the speech build a case for why anyone would want to switch to the popular vote in the first place, and the second part explained why the electoral vote is still better. Some of the advantages of the popular vote included that not every vote is considered equal, swing states, and that people are more informed through the media today than in the past. Despite these benefits, the electoral college supports federalism, which assists with the dispersion of power, and gives midwestern states a voice in the election. Additionally, any recount due to fraud or negligence would be on a statewide level opposed to a federal level.

Hacking into a computer is not allowed as it can disrupt the business as personal information can be

As technology has evolved there have become more ways to cast a vote than ever before. Most people are familiar with the traditional way of

Proponents say the voting method ensures that whoever is elected has the support of a majority of voters. They say this helps increase civility because candidates need to appeal to a spectrum broader than just their base in order to win over their opponents’ supporters on subsequent ballots. And theoretically it eliminates the possibility of a “spoiler” candidate winning.

According to the University of Missouri-Kansas City, the system isolates election problems like illegally extending voting hours or irregular voter turnouts. But to act as if we cant reform the voting poll place policies to prevent lines from outide poll places and from illegally extending voting hours is just lazy and unresponsive to issue that have repeatedly had a negative impact on the United States for some time now. The Electoral college also keeps us from avoiding a recount, a recount can easily increse the odds of fraud. With the ammount of voters in the United States a recount would be a utter mess. It also provides a canidate focus in the election which makes campaign organization a much more achievable thing rather then a way to for canidates to strategize how they go about going out on the campaign trail. Dates and amounts of time spent in certain states are typically planned and are in place for months prior to when most canidates declare they are even running. The last issue, would of course be giving smaller states a voice. Without the electoral college these states would be completely forgot about. All of these issues hold true in that they preserve the fairness of the election process, but what they don't do is provide a comparacent on if the solotions of the process outweigh

*[The primary advantage of the mail ballot is that it requires little time]* and [effort on the part of the voter]. [We think that also is a primary shortcoming of this process].

Electoral College is a system that was established by the Founding Fathers; they made this to add in the Constitution as a Compromise. This process was created in 1787, however, it is still used today. Although Direct voting involves citizens voting being equal, Electoral college is still more organized and suited for this country. The reasons for this is that it made the republic evolve, and it directs more power to the states. This is why Electoral College is better than Direct voting.

if 700 people have pursued the idea of changing the electoral college and none of them gained enough backing to actually get their proposal passed then this must mean their is no improved way of electing the president. Those who argue the electoral college should be abolished mostly prefer to have the presidential election be determined by popular vote, this idea is pure inane. Imagine the election went by popular vote, the entire presidential election would really be a media war. It would be about which candidate can get better advertising and how bad they can make the other candidates look. There is still so many people these days that don’t do their research, don’t listen to presidential debates, and don’t read about the election and vote based off what they see on what they see on twitter or articles online that are

I think that just like you, at the first glance of reading the question a lot of us had that same thought to go straight to the popular vote. It seems to be the most logical thing to think off and to do; however, I agree with you that after doing research one can understand the benefits of the Electoral College better and the benefits of it. The Electoral College gives the small states the voice that otherwise with the popular vote would not be able to have. This class has really opened my eyes and planted a seed to continue researching and not just go by what the media or others

In the Unite States of America i belive that it would not be asmart idea to use electronic voting machines beacause it would be unfair they would not be counting all the votes correctly. Also they can rig the election like the problems they had in ohio as they wasted that amout of money. It would not be a good idea to use electronic voting machines because the machines may also not count the votes correctly or place the vote uner another canidate. Also there has been alot of errors with the electronic voting machines, like they've also been hacked plenty of times witch causes the election to get ruined. There is also two sides to everything like the electonic voting machines also did alot of good work and made it easier to vote for the people

America was built on a foundation of freedom and rights. These rights are outlined in an attempt to let the average United States citizen’s voice be heard throughout the country. Voting in elections is the key to our democracy. Voting is a way that the people of the United States are able to voice their opinions about who they believe should lead the country; however, the founding fathers created the electoral college in order to protect the government against factions that could arise. The electoral college is a highly debated system that some Americans believe needs to be abolished.

In 2000 Riverside County California decided to spend 14 million dollars to make their voting system all electronic. This decision was made on the basis that in 1998 more than one million dollars was spent on paper ballots (in Riverside), but when only half of the county voted the extras had to be trashed. For local elections their new electronic system fetched a 99% approval rating from voters (Wired.com article). The only foreseeable downside to this technology is the start up price and with internet voting not likely due to security issues, this maybe the best solution.

The primary advantage of the mail ballot is that it requires little time and effort on the part of the voter. We think that also is a primary shortcoming of this process.

There are many controversial topics in this politically correct world. There are topics about morals, standards, and personal ethics. One of the newest debatable subjects however, is the one concerning this new centuries way of casting an individual’s vote, through electronic voting. Electronic voting is a way to cast a person’s ballot using an electronic voting machine that is touch screen. There are many advantages to using these machines during an election but there are also many disadvantages to using them as well. Before a person can make their own judgments on this subject it is important to understand and view both sides of the argument.

Gunmen on the grassy knoll, AIDS, landing on the moon, chemtrails, UFO’s, CIA mind control and Waco are some of the well-known conspiracies. But what about George W. Bush’s re-election? This cynicism goes beyond political rhetoric and focuses on our ability to participate in a representative democracy. Developed by the ancient Greeks, one of the first voting systems involved dropping bronze disks into barrels. As technology progressed, the advancements in voting systems surrendered an unacceptable system that lacks accuracy despite public outcry for a paper-verified trail.