Evolution Is A Highly Argumentative Topic, Today 's Society

Scientists from the University of Melbourne led a group of scientists from a number of universities in Australia who had then come to a new agreement that claimed that Mungo Man was 40,000 years old. The new age, 40,000 years, is a perfect match with the stratigraphic5 evidence and the 4 types of dating methods that were put forward from many scientists.

To accurately determine wether creationists should be involved with scientists in public debate, or in scientific debate at all, one must accurately define the institution that scientists represent. The issue present is the ability to provide an accurate definition of science. As Ruse stated “it is simply not possible to give a neat definition” (Ruse, 1982), however Ken Ham attempts to define science through the linguistics route. Using the origin of the latin word

Radiometric dating is still being used today. Modern uranium-lead radioactive dating of meteorites and earth materials gives us today's estimate that the earth is about 4.5 billion years

I read Bill Nye’s book Undeniable: Evolution and the Science of Creation. I chose the book because I was exploring evolutionary biology as a career path, and Bill Nye has always been close to heart, as I watched him on tv as a child. Nye discusses the umbrella topic of evolution, while relating to his career and life. Chapters 20 through 37 focuses on human genetics and evolution, drug resistance, genetically modified organisms, and astrobiology.

Bill Nye believes that people began from evolution which is accepted universally among mainstreamed scientists. Evolution is the thought of humans starting from germs and then animals and later on to how we are today. Also that we all have descended from common ancestors and natural selection. Bill Nye is arguing against the Genesis creation, which is believed life originates from acts of “divine creation” taking from the bible. One argument that Bill Nye offers is that there would not be enough time, for the four thousand years creationists believe earth was created, for Noah's ark to be built and earth to create. For example, there are trees that are over five

And so, as a conclusive demonstration, Drummond places the Bible and Darwin side-by-side, a symbol of the internal search for truth. His half-shrug and half-smile signal an acceptance of his own ignorance (Lawrence and Lee 2.2.79). Through Drummond’s actions, Inherit the Wind proves that a skeptical nature is far more valuable than mere

My first impression of this article was that McCaffrey was bias on teaching controversial topics, he states that, “There have been numerous court cases since then, and efforts to teach “both sides” of evolution in public schools have been promoted”. Throughout the

As for addressing fact versus theory, the two keywords in the titular treatise, he is slow to get to the point. Over the next paragraph he asserts creationists, as a sweeping generalization, have “presented not a single new fact,” and they have “…arguments that seemed kooky just a decade ago.” This, with the accusation that creationist’s true motivations are political, along with the improper comparison of “scientific creationism” to the Orwellian term “newspeak,” bears no relevance to the denotive differences between fact and theory in any context. Also, his attacking an opposing stance, and failing to point out any contradictions or fallacies therein, could be an indication that his own position lacks substance.

Everyone has their opinion and it depends on a person and what they choose to believe or accept. Per the research of Geologic Time (radiometric) the Earth is about 4.600 billions years old. The bible said it’s

The debate over the origins of the earth and of life has captivated and divided America since the late 19th Century. Evolutionists and creationists have battled in courtrooms , churches , academia , and public schools over the course of the 20th century and continue fighting, or attempting to make peace over, this culture war today. The debate has changed between the time of the Scopes Trial and the present in several important ways. First, creationists have developed many more diverse arguments, and employ not only biblical and moralistic arguments, but scientific evidence, logical arguments, and political rhetoric to counter evolutionary theory. Second,

The debate between creationists and evolutionists has been raging on for centuries. The clash between these opposing views was illustrated through the debate of Bill Nye and Ken Ham. Bill Nye being from the evolutionist side, and Ken Ham from the creationist. After the debate was over the winner I believe was quite evident, Bill Nye. I believe that Bill Nye won because his arguments were concrete, accurate and relatable. He argued over the age of the age of Earth , the validity of the story of "Noah's Ark", and the possibility that all animals were once herbivores.

It might be very distant, but in general, everything evolved from everything. Science has allowed us to draw these connections and discover how and why organisms evolved. In past years, mainly the fossil record and DNA testing has been the primary way of depicting these evolutionary traits, but I believe that we will become very advanced, whether that be technologically or scientifically, in our methods of depicting evolutionary amongst organisms. Maybe we then will be able to clearly observe the differences between Eurasian and North American mammoths, or be able to decipher if hybridization has occurred. Whatever it may be, our knowledge of the world around us continues to grow and expand each

As early as 1600AD scholars and scientists such as Isaac Newton believed that the words written in the Book of Genesis describing the creation of the Earth and mankind were in fact true. According to most biblical timelines the Earth and mankind were created around 6,000 years ago and it has only been within the past 300 years that scientists studying geological along with archaeological evidence that we now know how the Earth was created along with the evolution of humans. Today, a combination of several types of sciences tell us that over 4,000,000,000 years ago the Earth began to form and that the modern human didn't evolve until between 400,000 to 200,000 years ago.

Tyler, I found your post to be informative on what Bill Nye was asserting in these videos. I agree that Bill Nye does not give any real fact about evolution or creationism, and most viewers will not even notice it because Bill Nye the Science Guy said it. However while I agree with using the Bible to help the account of creationism is one of the best methods, to Nye it is not going to give him the poof he needs to believe. In my opinion, what is holding Nye back is his worldview. An individual’s worldview is what is going to determine whether or not they believe in creationism or evolution. Since creationism revolves around God, who created the world, which would mean that an individual would have to believe in God. However Nye is very vocal

In Creation Science is not Science, Michael Ruse argues that Creation science is not science and in Science at the Bar- Causes for Concern, Larry Laudan opposes this view by arguing that Creation Science is science, but that it is false. In this paper, I argue that Michael Ruse had the better argument and that Creation Science is not science. First, I explain Ruse’s argument for why creation science does not meet the criteria for science. Second, I consider and explain Larry Laudan’s opposing view that creation science is false science. I then argue why I believe Ruse has the better argument.