Others suggest that real decline in child labor came with compulsory education laws. Again however, forged documents allowed families to circumvent that regulation as well. Basu also claims that prosperity increased and therefore parents no longer had to force their children into the workforce. If Baland, Robinson’s, Krueger, and Donohue’s assessment of education reform and the welfare system worked out as their equations predicted, the third theory seemed viable. Nardinelli claims that employers no longer wanted child laborers with the advent of new technology. Basu, referred to economist Carolyn M. Moehling and her question, “was [it] the legislation that caused the decline in child labor or was it the diminishing dependence of industry …show more content…
Economists presided over the issue of child labor in the decades of 1980-2010. Their writings on the subject have dominated the field in contemporary history. The social history of child laborers is far behind in contemporary literature. While there is a great deal on the subject in the dawn of the twentieth century, there is little recent work. S.J. Kleinberg, a professor of American studies and history, reinvigorated the field in the twenty-first century with her social science article, “Children’s and Mothers’ Wage Labor in Three Eastern U.S. Cities, 1880-1920” published in Social Science History in 2005. In her article, she focuses not just on the child as the laborer, but on the family as a whole. The article takes a social view of the issue. Kleinberg argues that as child labor decreased, more mothers had to enter the workforce to compensate. Kleinberg proves this by examining three cities, Fall River, Massachusetts, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Baltimore, Maryland, each had very different demographics and economies. Kleinberg states, “This article explores the variations in children’s and mothers’ labor in three very different settings: Pittsburgh, Fall River, and Baltimore between …show more content…
Children played a crucial role in the industrial revolution, but historians often overlook their sacrifice and importance to the history of the industrial revolution in the United States. In the academic world, it has been economists, not historians that have drawn more attention to the issue of child labor. Through their theories and equations, they have unraveled the mysterious life of child laborers during the industrial revolution and have hypothesized how things would have turned out had child labor reform been different. Their work keeps changing and evolving as they build off each other’s theories. They also tend to work in pairs when writing articles. Their works cover a broad scope of topics. They investigate the reasons parents sent their children to work, who opposed or promoted child labor laws, they determine the efficiency of child laborers, they investigate education regulations for child laborers, and they attempt to explain the sudden decline in child labor. Economists have differing theses on these topics and often refer to other economists in their work. Historians and economists have warned researchers of child labor that what the data reveals may not be accurate. Parents, children, and employers often lied to evade the laws and regulations surrounding child labor. They lied about ages, school attendance, and anything else that gained them
With the effect in mind, she continues with another example of state laws that are totally disagreeable towards the eyes of the members of NAWSA. Kelley concentrates on the state of New Jersey knowing that they have the worst child labor laws in the nation. She explains that New Jersey lawmakers repealed their previous child labor laws to allow children over the age of fourteen to work overnight. (Kelley 6) The author describes the law repealing as “pitiful” and “a privilege,” using a sarcastic tone. Without this, children would have been done at work at six o'clock every day, except Friday. Kelley adds a final problem with state’s child labor laws, this time impacting the northeast. She explained to her audience that the cause of Pennsylvania lawmakers changing their child labor laws was due to the effect a twelve hour work time had affected these children. (Kelley 7) The author uses an example to exemplify that the effect of the law changes affects thousands more than the girl mentioned in the paragraph. Finally, these law changes affect only the children themselves, without any violation of the Commonwealth.
Child labor has been an issue we Americans have tolerated with for an extended period of time; longer than we should have. At the time of Kelley presenting her speech, July 22 1905, she stated we had “two million children under the age of sixteen years” who were part of the working class. This statistic illustrates our dire need to decrease and stop the use of children as workers in dangerous places like factories. Kelley states these children are as young as “six and seven” to “sixteen;” which only helps emphasize her point that young children, our futures, do not need to be put in these situations. She helps proves this throughout ter speech by appealing to our emotional, and logical aspects and then also establishing and presenting her credibility.
The practice of Child Labor in America in the early 1900s had a devastating impact on generations of children. This mainly impacted children of poor and disadvantaged families; these families tended to suffer from generations of debt or were new immigrants to America. These children worked long hours which they did not get paid nearly enough for. They worked hard, dangerous jobs daily. In the 1900s, children chose to support their families in times of need rather than furthering their education, for which they did not get paid nearly enough. These jobs affected their health poorly and had a negative impact on their childhood and development. Children of poor families in cities suffered the most during the Industrial Revolution, because they had to work long hours, did hard jobs, and often sacrificed their health and education to support their struggling families.
In 1900, children as young as nine years old were once expected to work sixteen hours a day in harsh conditions. They were useful because of their small size and the owners being able to pay low wages. Child labor laws exist because brave men, women, and children fought for these rights. The conditions of the children’s working environment caused Lewis Hine and the newsies to act upon it.
Before the Progressive Era, many children drastically suffered. They worked long hours, in dangerous factories, for very low wages and missed out on important things, such as education. Child labor had been a long time problem and
Many of the families that had children working had not much choice in allowing their kids to do so. One person or even two people working wouldn’t have been enough to support a whole family. Most of the children employed during this time period were working to provide income to their families. “As soon as a little
By first showing that children, before the turn of the 19th century are “frail”, “lost”, and “horrif[ied]”, it shows one of the first ideas about the children. By not allowing the children to work, the author displays an ironic stance on how the children are unfulfilling in society, in reality he shows that children are simply just being children. However, once not having the opportunity to work, the author implies that children will not benefit from employment due to a lack of childhood. This is shown once, the author turns to the overly exuberant benefits of employment as “generous”, “steady”, “drastic”, an ideal situation for many working class families. This shows that many corporations/ factories using these appeals to draw the attention of the working children, thus limiting them from other important factors such as an education. However, the author transitions from implied connotative words with more notable hypothetical examples to dig deeper into the
Throughout the 1700’s and the early 1800’s child labor was a major issue in American society. Children have always worked for family businesses whether it was an agricultural farming situation or working out of a family business in some type of workplace. This was usually seen in families of middle or lower class because extra help was needed to support the family. Child labor dramatically changed when America went through the Industrial Revolution. When America’s industrial revolution came into play, it opened a new world to child labor. Children were now needed to work in factories, mills, and mines. These were not ordinary jobs for young children, these jobs required much time, effort, and hard work. “American
The problem is enormous, but the trend, fortunately, is heading in the right direction. The overall growth of an economy is by no means the only factor, nor for that matter the most important factor, in the mitigation of child labor.
In the past 30 years, one of the most dynamic social changes in the history of the United States has taken place in the area of employment, specifically of women with children. Although, to some degree there have always been employed mothers, today a greater proportion of mothers are employed than ever before. Statistics show that in 1976, 48% of the population of women categorized as “married women with children” were employed and it increased to 62% in 1986 just 10 years later. What are the causes for this and how does it affect the children?
Currently there are 168 million child laborers in the world. More than half of them, 85 million, employed at hazardous jobs, according to the International Labour Organization. In the article “In Praise of Cheap Labor Bad jobs at bad wages are better than no jobs at all”, Paul Krugman Professor of economics at MIT, explains that child labor cannot just be wiped away like so many other distasteful practices. That it takes a perfect storm of economic success and low child labor numbers for a full transition to labor laws that ban it. Employers will agree to follow the law; similar to what happened in the U.S. in the 1930’s when Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act. This Act established standards for the basic minimum wage and overtime pay. It restricts the hours that children under age 16 can work and forbids the employment of children under age 18 in certain jobs deemed too dangerous. Krugman believes that many developing countries are not at a point where they can support a full ban on child labor. He gives the example of countries like “Indonesia [who are,] still so poor that progress is measured in terms of how much the average person gets to eat” (Krugman 4). Professor of economics at Yale university, Christopher Udry, in his article “Child Labor” provides a definition of child labor as “ the sacrifice of the future welfare of the child in exchange for additional income” (243). The causes of Child labor are not as simple as cultural or economic reasons, and a
(Laslett, 1970) Coupled with these innovations was the new concept of applying scientific methodology to industrial processes. (Laslett, 1970) All of these changes, while beneficial to businesses, did little to improve the lot of the industrial laborer. (Laslett, 1970) One of the key complaints of an entirely unregulated labor force in the late 1800s was the extensive use and abuse of child labor. In 1870, nearly three quarters of a million children between the ages of ten and fifteen worked in hazardous aspects of manufacturing, agriculture and street trade. (Laslett, 1970) By 1880, that number was over one point one million, or one in every six children in that age group. (Laslett, 1970) By 1900, that number doubled. The conditions under which children worked were very dangerous. They worked the same shifts as adults (about 12 hours a day, six days a week), denying them the opportunity for school and play. (Laslett, 1970) The factories, mills, mines and other work venues in which they labored were unsafe and unregulated. Children were also often used in the most dangerous aspects of industrial work, such as clearing jammed machines or working in confined spaces too small for adults. (Laslett, 1970) In 1881, only seven states had any kind of regulation laws for child laborer. Desperate for money to survive, immigrants and working-class Americans forged
The issue of child labor has drawn significant attention since early 1990s as many labor union and special interest groups advocate banning import of goods produced by the child labor in developing countries and the international consensus in the form of Convention on the Right of the Child (CRC) which is widely ratified in 1989 by countries (Boyden, Ling and Myers, 1998). However, concern regarding child labor is not new and can be dated back to industrial revolution, especially late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, in England many parents were helpless but to send their children to work to cope the increasing poverty and inequality. (Horrell and Humphries, 1995; Edmonds, 2007). Nevertheless, before the industrial revolution and
Most, but not all, historians agree on the fact that parents sent their children to work out of necessity, not want. S.J Kleinberg, a social historian, Kaushik Basu, an economist, and Pham Hoang Van, also an economist, agree that parents had to have working children to survive and ward off destitution. Basu and Van state clearly in their 1998 article, “The Economics of Child Labor” that, “Parents were desperately unhappy about the situations their children were in but could do nothing about it. The social system allowed them no choice." Yet, Thomas Dublin presents a different view in his book, Women at Work: The Transformation of Work and Community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826-1860. He studied the young women working in the Lowell mills.
While we, as Americans, are currently living in the most advanced civilization up to this time, we tend to disregard problems of exploitation and injustice to nations of lesser caliber. Luckily, we don't have to worry about the exploitation of ourchildren in factories and sweet shops laboring over machines for countless hours. We, in the United States, would never tolerate such conditions. For us, child labor is a practice that climaxed and phased away during and then after the industrial revolution. In 1998 as we approach the new millenium, child labor cannot still bea reality, or can it? Unfortunately, the employment and exploitation of children inthe work force is still alive and thriving. While this