Evolution Of Spartan Strategy During The Peloponnesian War

The Peloponnesian War pitted the Athenians against the Spartans. The Peloponnesians’ were an alliance of city-states controlled by Sparta. These two powerful city-states became locked in a struggle for dominance of the eastern Mediterranean area. The roots of the conflict and in particular this expedition is highly complex. As Thucydides says in his history of the war, the underlying cause was Spartan fear of Athens' expansive power. But, the triggering event was Athens' aggressive behavior towards Corinth, an ally of Sparta.

In this research paper I am going to talk about how the Spartan Military influenced our society. You are sure to expect to learn about how it affected how we live on an everyday basis. Also, on how it affected the way the U.S military runs/works. Sparta's military has caused many influences on our modern-day society. This includes on how our military works and fights to how we live every day. In the next paragraph I am going to give a little back ground on how Sparta's military training went.

"Just before the Peloponnesian War began, Pericles of Athens and King Archidamus of Sparta provided net assessments of the comparative strengths and weaknesses of the two sides. Evaluate their projections."

The army was responsible for maintaining the reputation of Sparta, arguably the most important role it played. Knows as the best warriors of the Peloponnese the Spartans used their strong military tactics in order to conquer neighbouring lands in order to further expand Sparta and gain larger areas of fertile land. Sparta lead the untied Peloponnese army and was greatly feared throughout the Mediterranean due to their title as the greatest army throughout Greece. This title in itself made the thought and task of attacking or declaring war on the spartiates a feared happening, further defending them from attacks dismissed as useless and never carried out by neighbouring states. The army was the main defence of Sparta keeping the citizens safe and

The Greeks, Trojans, and Spartans armies were very strategic and resourceful. They used battle forms, The Gods, their religion, and outside the box thinking to overcome battles and win wars. Tactics were highly impressive in the “Bronze Age” and are shown through the very impressive wars they have won. The Greeks used many tactics that included some strategies that are still used in today's

In 431 B.C., even before the Peloponnesian War, Athens’ strength compared to other Greek polises was evident. Athens had islands, a powerful, a well-trained navy, and one, if not the best, general at the time: Pericles. Pericles says in his speech that, “war is inevitable,” but in fact the war was preventable (72). Even with all of the military strengths and assets that Athenians had afforded to them, they chose to be merciful to the Peloponnesians who were in no shape to go to war. They did not have the experience, money, manpower, or means to participate in a lengthy war and Pericles makes the citizens aware of this (70). Pericles is both modest and humble for choosing to point out these facts which in turn helps the Athenians see the potential

The Peloponnesian War began when Sparta declared war on Athens. Two of the greatest city-states in Greece were Sparta and Athens. “Provide security and protection for their city” was what the Spartans thought their military society. Sparta boys were trained to be disciplined and obedient soldiers. Most men in Athen became farmers or skilled craftsmen.Unlike Sparta, Athenian women had less rights than them. Athens had a powerful navy. Sparta had a strong army. Athens was a leader of a powerful alliance of Greek city-states after the Persian Wars. In 415 BC, both the navy and army of Athens were damaged badly when they were defeated on the island of

Current militaries have benefitted from the principles of ancient Greek and Roman warfare by studying the ancient battles, tactics, and use of supplies to develop effective military plans. Current militaries study and debate historical turning points of the ancient battles to understand how the leaders planned and executed battles. The empires’ growth was due in part to the might and successes of their military. The strength of their militaries came from many factors including their use of armor, weapons, and military tactics. The empires’ leaders used these three advantages to create the superior armies of their time.

Athenian initial strategy objective (end) was raid Peloponnesian coat and exhaustion Sparta. They were planning exercised military leverage navy to maintain empire protect own people behind walls, diplomacy was demand clients the support, maintain impair form new alliances (Macedonia), before war economic was monopole fleet and saved money in bank, increase taxation. The king of Athens Pericles knew that Sparta had superior land forces, even so, the city walls provided appropriate defense counter to attacking forces. He also stated that Athens had the strong navy in the region, attainment of resources might be obtained by maritime network, huge financial reserves, and a large and young populations. These resources were the means in the Athenian war, may have taken success of the strategic goals.

This book is a history of the time between the Peloponnesian War and the Battle of Second Mantineia. During this time period the Spartans had just finished defeating the Athenians in the Peloponnesian War and were now the central power in Greece. As the book continues on you are shown that the city-state of Thebes was rising to power and eventually overtaking Spartan as the main power of the time.

The Peloponnesian War was the turning point in Athenian hegemony in Ancient Greece. It was fought in 431 B.C. between the Delian League, led by Athens, and the Peloponnesian League led by Sparta. According to Thucydides, Athens’ imposing hegemonic status and its overwhelming quest for more power made the Peloponnesian War and Athens’s eventual fall from power inevitable. Despite the Athenians having a far more superior navy and being considerably wealthier, they were defeated and made subjects of Sparta. In this paper, I will discuss Thucydides’ and Socrates’ reasons for why

During The Peloponnesian War, Sparta was able to dominate Athens and win the war. At the war’s conclusion, Athens was left in complete chaos, and Sparta was also weakened. Athens was politically, economically, and militarily affected, while Sparta was only slightly affected politically and militarily. However, with Sparta’s ignorance towards foreign people, the results of the war were worse than the war itself.

The Greeks introduced a new way of fighting “ Phalanx” this was consistent of fighting in units, according to the human web this development was vital and particular to the Polis:” Phalanx fighting had the effect of checking individual rivalries by transferring heroic pursuit of fame and glory from individual warriors to the Polis as a whole.”(69) This allowed city-states such as Athens and Sparta to rise and become influential in Greek civilization. Not only did this assure security at the Polis, but it also allowed Greek culture to spread throughout the Mediterranean, resulting in the foundations of new City states. However some people might argue that this was ultimately the downfall of the Greek classic age, with no unity throughout Greece itself with the exception of the time during the Persian invasion in 480 B.C.E, this allowed other more powerful states such as Athens and Sparta to conquer surrounding city states, according to the book the human web these ideas were based upon the notion of justice:” This collided with deep-seated notions of justice, so empire building first by Athenians, then Spartans, led only to failure, as rival coalitions formed to defeat them.” (74) Showing the ultimate flaw of the Polis, and that ultimately Greece was made up from independent states, as

Sparta was, above all, a military state, and emphasis on military fitness began at birth, imprinted through society and the political system. The education of the Spartan male children prove that the military and war was constantly a huge part of Spartan society, and the laws and systems that Sparta was governed by, only enforced the militaristic attitude into the society of Sparta. That the Spartans needed to be ready for war is proved by the discord between the Spartiate and the helots, who outnumbered and under ranked the Spartans.

Written by the Greek historian Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War is one that tells the story of the war (431-404 BC) which divided the Greek world between Athens and its allies and Lacedaemon. The Melian Dialogue presents two sides and two perspectives that of the Melians neutrality and that of the Athenians’ might. By Thucydides juxtaposing the Athenian’s position to that of the Melians, there is a clear conclusion of which side actions are tactically and morally acceptable. One would argue that the Athenians are immoral for violently plundering the Melian territory because they had the power to do so. However, given the circumstance of trying to defend their empire due to the imbalance of forces, the Athenian actions are not