Essay on Evolution VS. Creationism

Since the Age of the Enlightenment, the institution of religion has had to contend with the opposition of science regarding the issues of the origins of the world and of the human species. Up until around the end of the 17th century, the church was the authority on how the world and everything in it had come to be. However, with the great intellectual revolution came thinkers such as Galileo, Copernicus, Bacon, Descartes, and many others who challenged the biblical assumptions with empirically deduced scientific theories. The Catholic Church had a nasty habit of persecuting such ideological dissent toward creationism, calling it heresy and thereby somewhat suppressing a complete upheaval of the Scriptures. For many centuries to come,

One of the most controversial topics in the world today is on the creation of earth. In one sense students are taught in school that the earth and man was created through evolution. While, on the other hand people that attend church are taught that God created the earth and all of the inhabitants that live on it. For centuries, scientists have sought scientific evidence that proves either the creationist or evolutionist approach to the creation of earth. For decades, scientists have sought scientific evidence to prove evolution is the cause for the creation of earth, more scientific evidence proves that God created earth. Biblical and scientific evidence not only proves that God created earth, but also refutes the argument that earth was created by evolution.

The foundation for the theory of evolution was laid by Charles Darwin (Rose, n.d.). He developed hypotheses about natural selection which helped scientists develop the theory. Evolution is a theory and not a hypothesis because evolution has been proven by vast amounts of scientific data, research, and testing. The definition of a hypothesis is an educated explanation that needs to be researched and tested but has not yet been proven (Earman, 1984). There has been no scientific evidence to disprove the theory of evolution.

The Evolution vs. Creationism controversy goes all the way back to the Publishing of Origin of Species in 1859 by Darwin laying the foundation for the evolution of life to be understood. Scientists are continuously finding more evidence to support Darwin’s conclusion; that organisms descended from a common ancestor modified by the mechanism of natural selection resulting in the evolution of species adapting to their environment. The following are the main geological topics concerning creationism: radiometric dating, transitional forms and the Cambrian explosion. Creationism is nothing more than a child’s fairytale that lacks any scientific proof.

Today many scientists would have people to believe that evolution is the only reasonable explanation of the universe. Scientists, like Stephen Hawking, claim that they have proved that evolution is the correct answer to the origins of life and the universe, yet evolution is still a theory. This problem occurs because evolution is not the only answer. In fact, the creation theory offers a more feasible answer to the origins of the universe than the evolution theory does. Creation has the backings of the Bible, an extraordinarily credible book; where evolution provides a theory with many holes in it.

Despite great efforts to convince the opposing side, a battle still brews amongst creationists and evolutionists over the beginning of life and the universe, but neither opinions’ palpability can be firmly upheld through scientific manners. Since science can only prove hypotheses that are testable and based on current observations, neither creation nor evolutionary concepts can be proven with irrefutable evidence. However, regardless of the inability to prove either concept, most public school systems promote evolution as a scientific fact. Many students who lack firm beliefs about the origin of life believe what they are taught without giving any personal thought to the matter. Instead of robotically absorbing biased information,

There always has been a controversy whether evolution really did happen or not. Many evolutionists, philosophers and biologists have presented sufficient evidence that evolution is true. Yet there is still debate about this contentious topic. With the facts and findings of fossil records of earlier species, ideas of initial theorists, and our own genetics and DNA, evolution can be hard to prove wrong. Evolution is not just a change over time, but that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor. This process is occurring in our lives right now.

Darwin’s theory of natural selection focused on organism’s traits that made them more adaptable to the environment in order to survive and reproduce more offspring’s. Darwin believed the better the organism adapt to their environment the higher the rate of them surviving for a long period of time. Inherited traits that affect the reproduction of an individuals and differentiates them is called natural selection (Eadie, 2015, 8/31/2015). Evolution has to do more with the genetic and it how it change from generations (Eadie, 2015, 8/31/2015). One relationship between natural selection and evolution is that they both evolve from individuals, Natural selection with individual’s reproduction variation and evolution with how they genetically change

To begin, let’s start off with the meaning of evolution. Evolution is a process where something changes into a different but better form. Evolution is made up of three different components, which are natural selection, macro-evolution, and micro-evolution. In this essay, we’re going to focus more on natural selection. Natural selection is the selection of an organism which is more often fit to its environment. For example, if you had black and white moths on a black tree trunk. Who would survive? The black moths because they are better fit for survival because they’re not easily seen. Now that we understand that, let’s talk about Darwin’s theory of Evolution by natural selection. In this theory he developed basically explained how organisms

Creationism is the theory that man, the earth, and the rest of the universe was originally created rather than randomly exploding from nothingness into chance existence. We reside on the surface of a small superbly crafted, autonomous self regulating space vehicle. Together with survival, conquest and death we bear witness to beauty, fragrances, love and music. Think about this. Mathematics, philosophy, springtime, depravity, farming, courtship, quasars, and iphones; all came from nothingness?, formed by chance......?

Since the Scopes Trials came to a close, the Supreme Court enforced the teaching no of evolution in all public schools across the US in 1987. The interesting part was that most people believe that the Supreme Court had banned the teachings of creationism, but the decision stated that creation is no more than how life began (“Teaching Creation,” 2010). The case that made the decision, Edwards vs. Aguillard, actually allow public schools to teach either creation or evolution, as long as the teacher does not mention God in the picture (“Teaching Creation,” 2010). Therefore, the teaching of creation is not illegal. Up to a certain point where God is mentioned. This fact can depict one’s belief in God and how humans came

Almost everyone wonders if the universe was created and how it was created. People also ask, “How did human originate?” This is an argument that has been fought for many years. Although there are several ideas, society mainly argues over two of them. The first idea is that man was created by God during his creation of the universe. This is the idea of creationism. It is supported by many religious people. Creationism is supported by religion. The second way that humans could have originated is through a process called evolution. Evolution is a theory proposed by scientists to explain the origin of all species. Because both explanations are theories, neither can be proven right or wrong. To make a decision on which theory is

Do you believe the entire universe was miraculously created from a giant spinning ball of dirt, or do you believe that a banana and a human are related? Creationism proves evolution wrong in many ways, such as the Big bang theory, how every living being has a common ancestor which is a single celled organism, and dating how old the rocks and fossils are. People often debate how the world was formed or created. Some people believe that the universe was miraculously created from a spinning ball of gas and dirt. Then one day it unexpectedly exploded, creating all the galaxies and living creatures over billions of years. This would be known as the Big Bang Theory. They believe this this as it matches up with their

Creation vs. Evolution There has always been a conflict between the religious world and the scientific world. Whether it be when science first challenged that the earth was not the center of the universe as dictated by the Church, or when it was discovered that the earth was round rather than flat. Both these "theories" today are widely accepted and the rest of society generally ridicules any persons that believe the earth is the center of the universe or that the world is flat. However, at the time of their discovery, there was massive outcry by the religious community, as they believed it contradicted the "facts" in the bible.

There is a blurry and indistinct line between giving the best possible scientific support for a theory in which one strongly believes that has only incomplete evidence, and writing a persuasive piece that will draw people to one side of an argument based on feelings as well as facts. Indeed, there may be no line at all, upon close inspection, but that would be an unpleasant thought to most scientists, who value their ability to write objective reports on subjects and end up with one best answer, because science possesses answers that are definitely and provably better than other answers.