Exam 2 Finance 470
1. When is EAC analysis appropriate for comparing two or more projects? Why is this method used? Are there any implicit assumptions required by this method that you find troubling? Explain.
The EAC approach is appropriate when comparing mutually exclusive projects with different lives that will be replaced when they wear out. This type of analysis is necessary so that the projects have a common life span over which they can be compared; in effect, each project is assumed to exist over an infinite horizon of N-year repeating projects. Assuming that this type of analysis is valid implies that the project cash flows remain the same forever, thus ignoring the possible effects of, among other things: (1) inflation,
…show more content…
Using the present value of an annuity equation, we find: PV = C(PVIFA20%,10) $13,000,000,000 = C(PVIFA20%,10) C = $3,100,795,839
This is the total cash flow, so the number of planes that must be sold is the total cash flow divided by the cash flow per plane, or: Number of planes = $3,100,795,839 / $52,208,835 Number of planes = 59.39 or about 60 planes per year
5. Explain why a characteristic of an efficient market is that investments in that market have zero NPVs.
On average, the only return that is earned is the required return—investors buy assets with returns in excess of the required return (positive NPV), bidding up the price and thus causing the return to fall to the required return (zero NPV); investors sell assets with returns less than the required return (negative NPV), driving the price lower and thus causing the return to rise to the required return (zero NPV).
6. A stock has had returns of 3 percent, 38 percent, 21 percent, 15 percent, 29 percent, and 13 percent over the last six years. What are the arithmetic and geometric returns for the stock?
The arithmetic average return is the sum of the known returns divided by the number of returns, so: Arithmetic average return = (.03 + .38 + .21 – .15 + .29 – .13) / 6 Arithmetic average return = .1050 or 10.50%
Using the equation for the
15. Investment A has an expected return of $25 million and investment B has an expected return of $5 million. Market risk analysts believe the standard deviation of the return A is $10 million, and for B is $30 million (negative returns are possible here).
* By CAPM, we can get (8.3277%). We can calculate the each of different companies and get the average value. Or we can use CAPM once from average =0.8155. These two results are equivalent.
4. What additional information does Harris need to complete her analyses and compare the two projects? What specific questions should she ask each of the project sponsors?
Finally, in order to complete a more accurate comparison between the two projects, we utilized the EANPV as the deciding factor. Under current accepted financial practice, NPV is generally considered the most accurate method of predicting the performance of a potential project. The duration of the projects is different, one lasts four years and one lasts six years. To account for the variation in time frames for the projects and to further refine our selection we calculated the EANPV to compare performance on a yearly basis.
It is given that the competition increases by 2. Therefore, Average Rating decreases by 0.5798.
You recently purchased a stock that is expected to earn 12% in a booming economy, 8% in a normal economy and lose 5% in a recessionary economy. There is a 15% probability of a boom, a 75% chance of a normal economy, and a 10% chance of a recession. What is your expected rate of return on this stock?
In the mini-case, Mr. Breezeway indicated two kinds of percentage to determine the required return. One of them is the companies' return on book equity (% 15) and the other one is the investment return percentage in the rural supermarket industry (% 11) which shows that investors in rural supermarket chains, with risks similar to Prairie Home Stores, expected to earn about % 11 percent on average. Since the companies' rate of return determined by the rate of return offered by other equally risky stocks, then it should be % 11.
You can earn 5% per year compounded annually for the next 4 years, followed by 8% per year compounded quarterly for 5 years. What is the average annual compounded rate of return over the 9 year period?
b) In order to calculate the mean or average for the governors and CEO’s, I added together all the figures and divided that sum by 4 since there
When implementing project 1, you face technical and market risk. How would you assess the risks embedded in Project 1?
| a) Using the traditional method of assessing project performance, we would be able to see if we have been over or under budget and timelines, and we would only have this information once the project has been completed. However, with the traditional approach would not be able to effectively track project performance at a task level and at any given point in time. Due to this, decisions that may need to be taken during the project or identifying issues or project health during project execution is more difficult using traditional approaches than using the EVM process. b) The EVM process is based on tracking the schedule and cost performance at a task level on an on-going basis, that will help determine project task level and overall status with effective indicators that would help make project related decisions. In the EVM process, a baseline plan is made for project costs and timelines and then these are tracked against actual costs and work completion to find out the cost variances and schedule variances and cost and schedule indexes, that will help determine how the project is performing on these parameters. If the variances are in negative or if the indexes are less than 1, it means that the task or the project is behind on cost and schedule and
30) The introduction of a new product to the market using market-penetration pricing is most likely to be successful when _____________.
b. What would Mrs. Beach have to deposit if she were to use common stock and earned an average rate of return of 11%.
Complete problem 18 in Chapter 3 (shown below) and submit to the instructor. Show your work to find the annualized return for each of the listed share prices. Write a 100 word analysis of the process to calculate these annualized returns.
Dividends were assumed to grow at the geometric average of the last 6 years, 20.28%. P0 = D2 Dn Pn D1 + + ··· + + 1 2 n (1 + Ke ) (1 + Ke ) (1 + Ke ) (1 + Ke )n $1.58 $2.28 $87.31 $1.31 + + ··· + + = 1 2 4 (1 + 7.0%) (1 + 7.0%) (1 + 7.0%) (1 + 7.0%)4 = $72.53