Examinig the Effect of Human Population Control Essay examples

In October 12, 1999, the world's population has reached to 6 billion people. about only 12 years later (October 31, 2011) the world has gone up to 7 billion. Many people on the planet are worried about the world population going too high. They fear that too many people would result in starvation and quick depletion of resources. Some people believe that we should have some type of law that would limit the number of children we can have in each family. Something similar has come true in China about 30 years ago. In September 25, 1980, China's One-Child Policy has been created. This policy keeps parents from having more than one baby with the exception of twins, triplets, quadruplets, and so on. Parents may also have

The idea of population control is one that ignites people to talk about and explore. Some countries have implemented population control for quite some time now. There are many attributes that go against the argument, but there are also some potential positives that could come from it. No matter what religion or background people come from, each person has their own view on if population control is right or wrong. Many people choose to see certain positives over the negatives while others look at things the other way around. One of biggest and controversial topics within population control is issues of the environment.

India’s statistics are similar. According to the BBC “In 1961, for every 1,000 boys under the age of seven, there were 976 girls. Today, the figure has dropped to a dismal 914 girls. Although the number of women overall is improving (due to factors such as life expectancy), India's ratio of young girls to boys is one of the worst in the world after China. Many factors come into play to explain this: infanticide, abuse and neglect of girl children. But campaigners say the decline is largely due to the increased availability of antenatal sex screening, and they talk of a genocide”.

Overpopulation is a relatively recent issue. The world’s population has grown exponentially over the past twenty to thirty years. For example, the country of Bangladesh, with a population density of 1,188 people per square kilometer, has a 1.2% annual growth rate. Comparing these numbers with the United

Thomas Malthus’ wrote ‘An Essay on the Principle of Population’ argued that the increasing rate of population growth is the impetus of many social and economic issues that affects our society. His belief was that population increases in geometrical scale whilst basic supply for humans increase in arithmetical scale, ‘I SAID THAT POPULATION, WHEN UNCHECKED, increased in a geometrical ratio, and subsistence for man in an arithmetical ratio.’ (Quoted from An Essay on the Principle of Population, Chapter 2, page 6) Malthus believed that overpopulation would lead to mass malnutrition, famine, disease and even war. He proposed two kinds of method that could keep the population in a sustainable level. First is preventative checks, which suggested using moral restrains such as the practice of abstinence and criminal punishments for those who had children that they could not support. The other method is positive checks. Positive checks are factors that could increase the death

The current world's population is approximately six billion people, and the amount of time that it takes for the population to increase by another billion is decreasing with each billion. It is estimated that they will be about eight billion people by the year 2020, and this is due to its continuation of growth” (Southwick 159). An understanding of the causes and what might possibly happen is the first step to dealing with the population crisis.

Overpopulation is a concern as technology improves the quality of life for human beings. We are not increasing population because of births but because people are now living longer. With twice as many people now on Earth, our resources are depleting twice as fast. British Economist, Thomas Malthus, wrote in his essay in 1798, that by not reducing human population, a human would surpass agricultural productivity. However, his predictions never came true as innovative technology preserved food from spoiling and birth rates began to drop. After two centuries since Malthus’s claim, economists believed that the early predictions of 12 million people by 2050, seemed far-fetched. No longer does society need to limit population but learn how to support the population it has. No one knows for sure what Earth’s carrying capacity is as it greatly depends on what humans are willing to sacrifice to survive. It is estimated that the capacity is over a million and under a trillion. Today’s standard of living for most individuals far exceeds that of individuals 50 years ago. Technology has advanced our expectations and increased our carbon foot print. The population is slowing down in developed areas but growing in undeveloped areas. These areas population is growing at an alarming rate and will be unable to support the growth rate. Investment in education, family planning services and the status of women’s rights play a crucial factor in a countries fertility rates.

The Earth is currently 4.54 billion years old, holding about 332,500,000 cubic miles of water, an estimate of 8.7 billion mammals, and close to 7 billion humans. The modern humans, evolved from archaic humans, have been roaming the Earth for about 17,000 years. Over the last fifty years, human population grew faster than it has ever before. In the 1960s, the world population was at about 3 billion people, increasing to an estimate of 6 billion people by 1999. The expected growth of world population from 6 billion people in 1999 is about 9 billion people by 2044, causing the world to become overpopulated. The word “population” causes many different reactions and thoughts. For example, it stimulates anger because of irresponsible procreation, insufficient funding for birth control methods, and religion for being against contraception and abortion. The reason that anger is one of the main reactions is that many are aware of how population growth can damage the Earth and affect the future. To reduce the population growth rates, there should be a worldwide, two-child policy for every couple during the process of establishing basic education because research has shown the positive effects of China’s one-child policy, how Earth’s resources are decreasing, and how overpopulation has negatively affected the environment.

From a great age, the political figures and thinkers have detained opinions, based on political, military, and socio-economic rewards, about population issues as the most desirable number of people or the need to excite or hold back population growth. In order to get a handle on population issues, put the facts of population together with the “whys” and “wherefores.” In other words, that need a demographic perspective - a way of relating basic information to theories about how the world operates demographically. A demographic perspective guide through the sometimes tangled relationship between population factors (such as: distribution, age structure and growth) and the rest of what is going on in the society. In order to develop

Two hundred years ago less than one billion humans roamed the earth. Today the current world population stands at 7.3 billion and is expected to reach 8.5 billion by 2030 (source UN) this is due to the decline in death rates and increase in birth rates. The population has seen fluctuations, and changes over the centuries with astonishing peaks during the 20th century. In order to understand these changes, we will need study the growth, the explosions and drops in the world’s population. In this unit, we will therefore be analysing the causes of population change as well as the potential consequences.

In the last decades, the mortality rate has reduced, and life expectancy has risen significantly due to the advance in the medical aspect. As a result, most countries of the world have experienced enormous changes in the people number. These changes have boomed considerably and have converted to overpopulation. Currently, the global population is 7 billion, and the increase rate is 1.3% annually that means by the end of the twenty-first century the population will reach twelve billion (Keenan, 2013). Therefore, there is a huge debate going on right now regarding overpopulation. For some people, explosion in population has no detrimental impacts in the future, and it will be bearable. In contrast, others believe rapid growing population can cause disaster; this concept is the most plausible. Accordingly, in this essay, the notion of being overpopulation as a catastrophe will be proved in terms of environmental and healthy questions, natural resources consumption and economic and social issues.

With rapid population growth and urbanization escalating, overcrowding has concerned many scientists, researchers, and the human populace as a whole. Overpopulation, the condition where an area holds more people than in which the area can properly function, is a serious issue which has many adverse effects on the well-being of a healthy human population. A growing seven billion people live on Earth and factors such as pollution, and human well being may all be affected by overpopulation, and continued growth in population will cause an even greater impact on society, individuals, and the environment. The effects of overpopulation is a multi-layered combination of different factors, all of them affecting each other in a variety of ways, yet they all work together to lead to the collapse of society. The continuation of these trends due to rising overpopulation will lead to the ultimate collapse of society attributed to the degradation of social structure, environmental structure, and human behavioral alterations and the culmination of the resulting effects. Continued population growth needs to be ended in the near future as it will affect every human being on the surface of the planet to a massive scale that can not be reversed.

Naturally, as our population grows in size our growth rate increases exponentially. As a result, we face the issue of overpopulation, one of the many dangerous trends discussed in Anthony Barnosky and Elizabeth Hadly’s Tipping Point for Planet Earth. Currently, if we do not make any changes, it is expected that we will reach a population size over twenty-seven billion people by the year 2100. Along with this massive increase in population size, we will also face a rise in food and water shortages, an increase in population density, and an overall loss of quality of life. In order to prevent these potential effects, Barnosky and Hadly suggested three possible solutions to combating overpopulation—a global catastrophe, a one-child policy, or an increase in education, job, and contraception availability among girls. Any one of these solutions will potentially help us prevent overpopulation; however, exactly which solution it ends up being all depends on our preparation and the actions we take now.

Population and what is the problem with population? More people, people versus resources perspective. Social perspective versus social relations. We, as human beings are living at the best time. We may be living in a strange, most difficult moment with all the wars happening around. At first stage, we started with war and Dark Ages and plagues and taboos, but then, recent centuries have increased the population number in the 150 years.

With a current population of 1.252 billion people, it’s easy to tell why India started implementing family planning practices. Overpopulation was starting to affect India when they gained independence from England (Rubenstein, 2014). The Planning Commission was set up in 1950 to address all needs of the country and to decide the best way to use resources. The decline in death rate and growth of birth rate left the country no choice but to find a way to slow down the growth. This led to another branch of the Planning Commission being created in 1952 with the implementation of the National Family Planning Program in order to aide the country from such “societal ills as hunger, poverty, and national economic distress,” which were all believed